Saki Sawayama, Ryusuke Murakami, Y. Taga, Y. Kawaguchi, A. Yanai, H. Nonogaki
{"title":"引入机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术的围手术期效果","authors":"Saki Sawayama, Ryusuke Murakami, Y. Taga, Y. Kawaguchi, A. Yanai, H. Nonogaki","doi":"10.5180/JSGOE.36.2_106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Perioperative outcomes in the first year of introducing robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) using the daVinci Xi surgical system were evaluated based on comparisons with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH) for simple hysterectomies performed during the same period. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving comparisons between 38 cases of RAH from June 2019 to April 2020 and 28 cases of CLH from August 2018 to April 2020. All cases involved simple hysterectomies performed by 4 doctors (1 endoscopic technique-certified medical doctor and 3 doctors with less than 10 years of experience). Results: The characteristics of patients who underwent RAH and CLH were as follows, respectively: age, 47 vs 49 years (mean, p=0.62); body mass index, 23.4vs 22.9 kg/m (mean, p=0.57); uterine weight, 152 and 175 g (median, p=0.39); manipulator use, 28 (73%) and 21 (75%) cases (frequency, p=0.90); and 0/4 cases with endometriotic adhesions with Douglas fossa closure, 0 and 4 cases (frequency, p=0.028). The total operation time (from skin incision to skin closure) was significantly shorter in RAH cases (mean difference, 29 minutes; p=0.048) than in CLH cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss and perioperative complications. Conclusion: We safely introduced RAH by selecting appropriate cases in advance. In the future, it is necessary to study robot-assisted surgery so that it can be safely introduced in patients with large uterine weights and endometriotic","PeriodicalId":325241,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative outcomes of the introduction of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy\",\"authors\":\"Saki Sawayama, Ryusuke Murakami, Y. Taga, Y. Kawaguchi, A. Yanai, H. Nonogaki\",\"doi\":\"10.5180/JSGOE.36.2_106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Perioperative outcomes in the first year of introducing robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) using the daVinci Xi surgical system were evaluated based on comparisons with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH) for simple hysterectomies performed during the same period. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving comparisons between 38 cases of RAH from June 2019 to April 2020 and 28 cases of CLH from August 2018 to April 2020. All cases involved simple hysterectomies performed by 4 doctors (1 endoscopic technique-certified medical doctor and 3 doctors with less than 10 years of experience). Results: The characteristics of patients who underwent RAH and CLH were as follows, respectively: age, 47 vs 49 years (mean, p=0.62); body mass index, 23.4vs 22.9 kg/m (mean, p=0.57); uterine weight, 152 and 175 g (median, p=0.39); manipulator use, 28 (73%) and 21 (75%) cases (frequency, p=0.90); and 0/4 cases with endometriotic adhesions with Douglas fossa closure, 0 and 4 cases (frequency, p=0.028). The total operation time (from skin incision to skin closure) was significantly shorter in RAH cases (mean difference, 29 minutes; p=0.048) than in CLH cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss and perioperative complications. Conclusion: We safely introduced RAH by selecting appropriate cases in advance. In the future, it is necessary to study robot-assisted surgery so that it can be safely introduced in patients with large uterine weights and endometriotic\",\"PeriodicalId\":325241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5180/JSGOE.36.2_106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5180/JSGOE.36.2_106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:通过与同期行单纯子宫切除术的传统腹腔镜子宫切除术(CLH)进行比较,评估采用达芬奇手术系统的机器人辅助子宫切除术(RAH)第一年的围手术期疗效。方法:回顾性分析2019年6月至2020年4月38例RAH和2018年8月至2020年4月28例CLH。所有病例均由4名医生(1名内窥镜技术认证的医生和3名经验不足10年的医生)实施简单子宫切除术。结果:RAH和CLH患者的特征分别为:年龄47 vs 49岁(平均p=0.62);体重指数23.4vs 22.9 kg/m(平均,p=0.57);子宫重量,152和175 g(中位数,p=0.39);使用机械手28例(73%)、21例(75%)(频率,p=0.90);伴有道格拉斯窝闭合的子宫内膜异位症粘连0/4例,0/4例(频率,p=0.028)。RAH病例的总手术时间(从皮肤切开到皮肤闭合)显著缩短(平均差29分钟;p=0.048)。两组在出血量和围手术期并发症方面无显著差异。结论:通过提前选择合适的病例,可以安全地引入RAH。未来,有必要研究机器人辅助手术,以便将其安全地引入子宫重量大和子宫内膜异位症患者
Perioperative outcomes of the introduction of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy
Objective: Perioperative outcomes in the first year of introducing robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) using the daVinci Xi surgical system were evaluated based on comparisons with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH) for simple hysterectomies performed during the same period. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving comparisons between 38 cases of RAH from June 2019 to April 2020 and 28 cases of CLH from August 2018 to April 2020. All cases involved simple hysterectomies performed by 4 doctors (1 endoscopic technique-certified medical doctor and 3 doctors with less than 10 years of experience). Results: The characteristics of patients who underwent RAH and CLH were as follows, respectively: age, 47 vs 49 years (mean, p=0.62); body mass index, 23.4vs 22.9 kg/m (mean, p=0.57); uterine weight, 152 and 175 g (median, p=0.39); manipulator use, 28 (73%) and 21 (75%) cases (frequency, p=0.90); and 0/4 cases with endometriotic adhesions with Douglas fossa closure, 0 and 4 cases (frequency, p=0.028). The total operation time (from skin incision to skin closure) was significantly shorter in RAH cases (mean difference, 29 minutes; p=0.048) than in CLH cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss and perioperative complications. Conclusion: We safely introduced RAH by selecting appropriate cases in advance. In the future, it is necessary to study robot-assisted surgery so that it can be safely introduced in patients with large uterine weights and endometriotic