基于应答的口语对话系统自信注释

A. Gruenstein
{"title":"基于应答的口语对话系统自信注释","authors":"A. Gruenstein","doi":"10.3115/1622064.1622067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spoken and multimodal dialogue systems typically make use of confidence scores to choose among (or reject) a speech recognizer's N-best hypotheses for a particular utterance. We argue that it is beneficial to instead choose among a list of candidate system responses. We propose a novel method in which a confidence score for each response is derived from a classifier trained on acoustic and lexical features emitted by the recognizer, as well as features culled from the generation of the candidate response itself. Our response-based method yields statistically significant improvements in F-measure over a baseline in which hypotheses are chosen based on recognition confidence scores only.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response-Based Confidence Annotation for Spoken Dialogue Systems\",\"authors\":\"A. Gruenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/1622064.1622067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spoken and multimodal dialogue systems typically make use of confidence scores to choose among (or reject) a speech recognizer's N-best hypotheses for a particular utterance. We argue that it is beneficial to instead choose among a list of candidate system responses. We propose a novel method in which a confidence score for each response is derived from a classifier trained on acoustic and lexical features emitted by the recognizer, as well as features culled from the generation of the candidate response itself. Our response-based method yields statistically significant improvements in F-measure over a baseline in which hypotheses are chosen based on recognition confidence scores only.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/1622064.1622067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1622064.1622067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

口语和多模态对话系统通常使用置信度分数来选择(或拒绝)语音识别器对特定话语的n个最佳假设。我们认为在候选系统响应列表中进行选择是有益的。我们提出了一种新的方法,其中每个响应的置信度评分来自一个分类器,该分类器训练了由识别器发出的声学和词汇特征,以及从候选响应本身的生成中剔除的特征。我们基于响应的方法在F-measure中产生了统计上显著的改进,而在F-measure中,假设仅基于识别置信度得分来选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response-Based Confidence Annotation for Spoken Dialogue Systems
Spoken and multimodal dialogue systems typically make use of confidence scores to choose among (or reject) a speech recognizer's N-best hypotheses for a particular utterance. We argue that it is beneficial to instead choose among a list of candidate system responses. We propose a novel method in which a confidence score for each response is derived from a classifier trained on acoustic and lexical features emitted by the recognizer, as well as features culled from the generation of the candidate response itself. Our response-based method yields statistically significant improvements in F-measure over a baseline in which hypotheses are chosen based on recognition confidence scores only.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信