发展和维持与可持续性相关的学术规划:新兴实践的观察

Haris Alibašić, William R. Crawley
{"title":"发展和维持与可持续性相关的学术规划:新兴实践的观察","authors":"Haris Alibašić, William R. Crawley","doi":"10.17062/CJIL.V4I1.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview and summary of selected sustainability-related academic programs and certificates delivered by universities and colleges located in the same geographic area (Grand Rapids, Michigan, U.S.).   Holistic and practical dimensions of creating and sustaining educational programs are evaluated, and emerging outcomes from universities with a history of prosperous sustainability studies programs are provided as models of applicability.  The possible effects of the level of formalizing sustainability in higher education and different aspects of academic-level sustainability programming at universities and colleges in a single geographic region were studied in a comparative perspective.  The study focused on the role of internal and external leadership, political and appointed officials, networking factors of various stakeholders, demand for sustainability in education, and the resources commitment in staffing.  We evaluated each element in the context of sustainability in education and longevity and self-support.  These findings and the concept of successfully developing and sustaining sustainability‑related academic programs in Grand Rapids (MI) are examined within a broad and holistic context encompassing educational, programmatic, socioeconomic, organizational, and leadership dimensions.  While further research is warranted, predictably, all elements performed well and added value to the conceptual framework of developing and sustaining sustainability-related academic programming with potential lessons applicable to the programmatic approaches to education domestically and abroad.","PeriodicalId":261828,"journal":{"name":"Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and Sustaining Sustainability-Related Academic Programming: Observations of Emerging Practices\",\"authors\":\"Haris Alibašić, William R. Crawley\",\"doi\":\"10.17062/CJIL.V4I1.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview and summary of selected sustainability-related academic programs and certificates delivered by universities and colleges located in the same geographic area (Grand Rapids, Michigan, U.S.).   Holistic and practical dimensions of creating and sustaining educational programs are evaluated, and emerging outcomes from universities with a history of prosperous sustainability studies programs are provided as models of applicability.  The possible effects of the level of formalizing sustainability in higher education and different aspects of academic-level sustainability programming at universities and colleges in a single geographic region were studied in a comparative perspective.  The study focused on the role of internal and external leadership, political and appointed officials, networking factors of various stakeholders, demand for sustainability in education, and the resources commitment in staffing.  We evaluated each element in the context of sustainability in education and longevity and self-support.  These findings and the concept of successfully developing and sustaining sustainability‑related academic programs in Grand Rapids (MI) are examined within a broad and holistic context encompassing educational, programmatic, socioeconomic, organizational, and leadership dimensions.  While further research is warranted, predictably, all elements performed well and added value to the conceptual framework of developing and sustaining sustainability-related academic programming with potential lessons applicable to the programmatic approaches to education domestically and abroad.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17062/CJIL.V4I1.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17062/CJIL.V4I1.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文的目的是对位于同一地理区域(美国密歇根州大急流城)的大学和学院所提供的与可持续发展相关的学术课程和证书进行概述和总结。评估了创建和维持教育项目的整体和实践维度,并提供了具有繁荣可持续发展研究项目历史的大学的新兴成果作为适用性模型。从比较的角度研究了高等教育中可持续性正式化水平的可能影响以及单一地理区域内大学和学院学术水平可持续性规划的不同方面。这项研究的重点是内部和外部领导的作用、政治和任命的官员、各种利益攸关者的网络因素、教育的可持续性需求和工作人员的资源承诺。我们在教育、寿命和自我支持的可持续性背景下评估了每个元素。这些发现以及在大急流城(MI)成功开发和维持可持续发展相关学术课程的概念在广泛而全面的背景下进行了检查,包括教育,计划,社会经济,组织和领导方面。虽然需要进一步的研究,但可以预见的是,所有因素都表现良好,并为制定和维持与可持续性有关的学术方案的概念框架增加了价值,其中可能有适用于国内外教育方案方法的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing and Sustaining Sustainability-Related Academic Programming: Observations of Emerging Practices
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview and summary of selected sustainability-related academic programs and certificates delivered by universities and colleges located in the same geographic area (Grand Rapids, Michigan, U.S.).   Holistic and practical dimensions of creating and sustaining educational programs are evaluated, and emerging outcomes from universities with a history of prosperous sustainability studies programs are provided as models of applicability.  The possible effects of the level of formalizing sustainability in higher education and different aspects of academic-level sustainability programming at universities and colleges in a single geographic region were studied in a comparative perspective.  The study focused on the role of internal and external leadership, political and appointed officials, networking factors of various stakeholders, demand for sustainability in education, and the resources commitment in staffing.  We evaluated each element in the context of sustainability in education and longevity and self-support.  These findings and the concept of successfully developing and sustaining sustainability‑related academic programs in Grand Rapids (MI) are examined within a broad and holistic context encompassing educational, programmatic, socioeconomic, organizational, and leadership dimensions.  While further research is warranted, predictably, all elements performed well and added value to the conceptual framework of developing and sustaining sustainability-related academic programming with potential lessons applicable to the programmatic approaches to education domestically and abroad.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信