T. Jehi, W. Beeson, Gina Segovia-Siapco, Brenda Koranda, Hildemar Dos Santos
{"title":"健康教育干预增加纤维摄入量:一项随机临床试验","authors":"T. Jehi, W. Beeson, Gina Segovia-Siapco, Brenda Koranda, Hildemar Dos Santos","doi":"10.23953/cloud.ijanhs.438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intake level of fiber, a nutrient with a vast number of health benefits, falls behind the recommendations nationwide. The impact of nutrition education on improving daily intake has thus been investigated and shown to be effective in enhancing the intake of specific fiber-rich foods. Not much has been done to probe the effect of education on enhancing fiber intake with emphasis on all sources of dietary fiber. Thus, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine if a multi-component intervention—the Full Plate Diet— that places emphasis on fiberrich foods, impacts the dietary fiber intake to a level that exceeds the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine. Thirty-five subjects (7 males and 28 females) were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=20), which received the nutrition/health education or to the control group (n=15) which did not receive the education. A collective analysis of the two groups’ dietary intake was divided into three time points; April, May, and June. The recalled intake of dietary fiber and food groups considered to be rich sources of dietary fiber as well as macronutrients were averaged for each of these time points for each treatment group. For the purpose of comparing changes in intake of dietary fiber across the 3 time points and between the intervention and control groups, a linear mixed-model was used. The delta changes between the various time points were computed by subtracting the final time point minus the initial time point. Results showed that fiber intake increased significantly by 9.3 grams from the first time-point (April) to the second time-point (May) (95% CI 2.2, 16.4). The intake of legumes significantly improved by 0.36 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.7) and by 0.65 (95% CI: 0.3, 1.0) servings in the intervention group between baseline and the second and third-time (June) points, respectively, but did not change in the control group. Short-term education with emphasis on fiber intake from various food sources could improve the daily fiber intake. Longer follow-up investigations should also be conducted to assess whether or not health education could significantly improve the level of fiber on a longterm basis.","PeriodicalId":128972,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Nutritional and Health Science","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Health Education Intervention to Increase Fiber Intake: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"T. Jehi, W. Beeson, Gina Segovia-Siapco, Brenda Koranda, Hildemar Dos Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.23953/cloud.ijanhs.438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The intake level of fiber, a nutrient with a vast number of health benefits, falls behind the recommendations nationwide. The impact of nutrition education on improving daily intake has thus been investigated and shown to be effective in enhancing the intake of specific fiber-rich foods. Not much has been done to probe the effect of education on enhancing fiber intake with emphasis on all sources of dietary fiber. Thus, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine if a multi-component intervention—the Full Plate Diet— that places emphasis on fiberrich foods, impacts the dietary fiber intake to a level that exceeds the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine. Thirty-five subjects (7 males and 28 females) were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=20), which received the nutrition/health education or to the control group (n=15) which did not receive the education. A collective analysis of the two groups’ dietary intake was divided into three time points; April, May, and June. The recalled intake of dietary fiber and food groups considered to be rich sources of dietary fiber as well as macronutrients were averaged for each of these time points for each treatment group. For the purpose of comparing changes in intake of dietary fiber across the 3 time points and between the intervention and control groups, a linear mixed-model was used. The delta changes between the various time points were computed by subtracting the final time point minus the initial time point. Results showed that fiber intake increased significantly by 9.3 grams from the first time-point (April) to the second time-point (May) (95% CI 2.2, 16.4). The intake of legumes significantly improved by 0.36 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.7) and by 0.65 (95% CI: 0.3, 1.0) servings in the intervention group between baseline and the second and third-time (June) points, respectively, but did not change in the control group. Short-term education with emphasis on fiber intake from various food sources could improve the daily fiber intake. Longer follow-up investigations should also be conducted to assess whether or not health education could significantly improve the level of fiber on a longterm basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced Nutritional and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced Nutritional and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23953/cloud.ijanhs.438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Nutritional and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23953/cloud.ijanhs.438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
纤维是一种对健康有益的营养物质,其摄入量低于全国范围内的建议水平。因此,对营养教育对改善每日摄入量的影响进行了调查,并显示其对提高特定富含纤维食物的摄入量是有效的。在强调膳食纤维的所有来源的情况下,教育对提高纤维摄入量的影响还没有多少研究。因此,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以确定多组分干预-全餐盘饮食-强调富含纤维的食物,是否会影响膳食纤维摄入量超过医学研究所的推荐水平。35名受试者(7名男性,28名女性)被随机分配到接受营养/健康教育的干预组(n=20)和未接受营养/健康教育的对照组(n=15)。对两组的饮食摄入量进行集体分析,分为三个时间点;四月、五月和六月。在每个治疗组的每个时间点上,对膳食纤维和富含膳食纤维的食物组以及宏量营养素的召回摄入量进行平均。为了比较三个时间点以及干预组和对照组之间膳食纤维摄入量的变化,采用了线性混合模型。通过减去最终时间点减去初始时间点来计算各个时间点之间的增量变化。结果显示,从第一个时间点(4月)到第二个时间点(5月),纤维摄入量显著增加了9.3克(95% CI 2.2, 16.4)。在基线和第二次和第三次(6月)点之间,干预组的豆类摄入量分别显著提高了0.36份(95% CI: 0.01, 0.7)和0.65份(95% CI: 0.3, 1.0),但对照组没有变化。强调从各种食物来源摄取纤维的短期教育可以提高每日纤维摄入量。还应进行更长时间的随访调查,以评估健康教育是否能在长期基础上显著提高纤维水平。
A Health Education Intervention to Increase Fiber Intake: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The intake level of fiber, a nutrient with a vast number of health benefits, falls behind the recommendations nationwide. The impact of nutrition education on improving daily intake has thus been investigated and shown to be effective in enhancing the intake of specific fiber-rich foods. Not much has been done to probe the effect of education on enhancing fiber intake with emphasis on all sources of dietary fiber. Thus, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine if a multi-component intervention—the Full Plate Diet— that places emphasis on fiberrich foods, impacts the dietary fiber intake to a level that exceeds the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine. Thirty-five subjects (7 males and 28 females) were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=20), which received the nutrition/health education or to the control group (n=15) which did not receive the education. A collective analysis of the two groups’ dietary intake was divided into three time points; April, May, and June. The recalled intake of dietary fiber and food groups considered to be rich sources of dietary fiber as well as macronutrients were averaged for each of these time points for each treatment group. For the purpose of comparing changes in intake of dietary fiber across the 3 time points and between the intervention and control groups, a linear mixed-model was used. The delta changes between the various time points were computed by subtracting the final time point minus the initial time point. Results showed that fiber intake increased significantly by 9.3 grams from the first time-point (April) to the second time-point (May) (95% CI 2.2, 16.4). The intake of legumes significantly improved by 0.36 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.7) and by 0.65 (95% CI: 0.3, 1.0) servings in the intervention group between baseline and the second and third-time (June) points, respectively, but did not change in the control group. Short-term education with emphasis on fiber intake from various food sources could improve the daily fiber intake. Longer follow-up investigations should also be conducted to assess whether or not health education could significantly improve the level of fiber on a longterm basis.