理智与疯狂

J. Parrington
{"title":"理智与疯狂","authors":"J. Parrington","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198801634.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explains that the central difficulty in diagnosing and treating mental disorders is reaching a level of agreement about their underlying basis. In this respect, proponents of the view that mental disorders are primarily biological in origin were particularly excited by the Human Genome Project, as they believed this would make it possible to truly get a grip on the nature of such conditions. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have now been used to study a range of mental disorders. However, GWAS findings have been contradictory and confusing and this chapter looks at the reasons why, and at a number of possible biological causes of schizophrenia. The chapter then considers a very different way of explaining schizophrenia, one based on the idea that it is not genetics but the social environment that determines whether an individual succumbs to this disorder. A version of this hypothesis sees schizophrenia as primarily the result of defective family relations, and the disorder as a consequence of those distorted relations, but also as a response to wider pressures in society. One psychotherapy approach claimed to have a very good level of success in the treatment of schizophrenia is called 'Open Dialogue.","PeriodicalId":307422,"journal":{"name":"Mind Shift","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sanity and Madness\",\"authors\":\"J. Parrington\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198801634.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explains that the central difficulty in diagnosing and treating mental disorders is reaching a level of agreement about their underlying basis. In this respect, proponents of the view that mental disorders are primarily biological in origin were particularly excited by the Human Genome Project, as they believed this would make it possible to truly get a grip on the nature of such conditions. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have now been used to study a range of mental disorders. However, GWAS findings have been contradictory and confusing and this chapter looks at the reasons why, and at a number of possible biological causes of schizophrenia. The chapter then considers a very different way of explaining schizophrenia, one based on the idea that it is not genetics but the social environment that determines whether an individual succumbs to this disorder. A version of this hypothesis sees schizophrenia as primarily the result of defective family relations, and the disorder as a consequence of those distorted relations, but also as a response to wider pressures in society. One psychotherapy approach claimed to have a very good level of success in the treatment of schizophrenia is called 'Open Dialogue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mind Shift\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mind Shift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198801634.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind Shift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198801634.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章解释了诊断和治疗精神障碍的主要困难是对其潜在基础达成一致。在这方面,精神障碍主要是生物学起源的观点的支持者对人类基因组计划特别兴奋,因为他们相信这将有可能真正掌握这些疾病的本质。全基因组关联研究(GWAS)现在已被用于研究一系列精神障碍。然而,GWAS的发现一直是矛盾和令人困惑的,本章着眼于精神分裂症的原因,以及一些可能的生物学原因。然后,本章考虑了一种非常不同的解释精神分裂症的方式,这种方式基于这样一种观点,即决定一个人是否会患上这种疾病的不是基因,而是社会环境。这种假设的一个版本认为精神分裂症主要是家庭关系缺陷的结果,而这种疾病是这些扭曲的关系的结果,但也是对社会更广泛压力的反应。一种心理治疗方法被称为“开放对话”,据称在治疗精神分裂症方面取得了非常好的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sanity and Madness
This chapter explains that the central difficulty in diagnosing and treating mental disorders is reaching a level of agreement about their underlying basis. In this respect, proponents of the view that mental disorders are primarily biological in origin were particularly excited by the Human Genome Project, as they believed this would make it possible to truly get a grip on the nature of such conditions. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have now been used to study a range of mental disorders. However, GWAS findings have been contradictory and confusing and this chapter looks at the reasons why, and at a number of possible biological causes of schizophrenia. The chapter then considers a very different way of explaining schizophrenia, one based on the idea that it is not genetics but the social environment that determines whether an individual succumbs to this disorder. A version of this hypothesis sees schizophrenia as primarily the result of defective family relations, and the disorder as a consequence of those distorted relations, but also as a response to wider pressures in society. One psychotherapy approach claimed to have a very good level of success in the treatment of schizophrenia is called 'Open Dialogue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书