利用贝叶斯相关反馈(BRF)模型提高分类精度

Fatihah Mohd, M. Jalil, N. M. Mohamad Noor, Z. Bakar
{"title":"利用贝叶斯相关反馈(BRF)模型提高分类精度","authors":"Fatihah Mohd, M. Jalil, N. M. Mohamad Noor, Z. Bakar","doi":"10.1109/INFRKM.2018.8464783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the components of a decision support system (DSS) are discussed. One of the main components is the inference engine (IE). In order to improve the IE in supporting the system's output, Bayesian Relevance Feedback (BRF) model is proposed. This BRF model as suggested has the potential to generate the most relevant target or classes (stage) based on relevance feedback knowledge. Subsequently, eight classifiers: Bayesian Model (BM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Meta MultiClass Classifier (MCC), Rule OneR (OneR), Random Tree (RT), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Naive Bayes (NB), and SMO-Poly Kernel (E-1.O) (SVM) are used in order to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed model. The empirical comparison shows that the BRF significantly improved the accuracy of the entire classification algorithm used for the oral cancer data set with a mean accuracy of 95.83%. It is also noted that the proposed model, BRF contributes to solving the posterior probabilities that do not exist (probability with zero values) in order to improve the decision-making in the oral cancer diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":196731,"journal":{"name":"2018 Fourth International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management (CAMP)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Accuracy in Classification Using the Bayesian Relevance Feedback (BRF) Model\",\"authors\":\"Fatihah Mohd, M. Jalil, N. M. Mohamad Noor, Z. Bakar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFRKM.2018.8464783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the components of a decision support system (DSS) are discussed. One of the main components is the inference engine (IE). In order to improve the IE in supporting the system's output, Bayesian Relevance Feedback (BRF) model is proposed. This BRF model as suggested has the potential to generate the most relevant target or classes (stage) based on relevance feedback knowledge. Subsequently, eight classifiers: Bayesian Model (BM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Meta MultiClass Classifier (MCC), Rule OneR (OneR), Random Tree (RT), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Naive Bayes (NB), and SMO-Poly Kernel (E-1.O) (SVM) are used in order to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed model. The empirical comparison shows that the BRF significantly improved the accuracy of the entire classification algorithm used for the oral cancer data set with a mean accuracy of 95.83%. It is also noted that the proposed model, BRF contributes to solving the posterior probabilities that do not exist (probability with zero values) in order to improve the decision-making in the oral cancer diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Fourth International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management (CAMP)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Fourth International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management (CAMP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRKM.2018.8464783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Fourth International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management (CAMP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRKM.2018.8464783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究讨论决策支持系统(DSS)的组成。其中一个主要组件是推理引擎(IE)。为了提高IE对系统输出的支持,提出了贝叶斯相关反馈(BRF)模型。这个BRF模型有可能根据相关反馈知识生成最相关的目标或类(阶段)。随后,使用贝叶斯模型(BM), k近邻(KNN),元多类分类器(MCC),规则OneR (OneR),随机树(RT),多层感知器(MLP),朴素贝叶斯(NB)和smo -聚核(SVM) 8个分类器来评估所提出模型的效率。实证比较表明,BRF显著提高了整个口腔癌数据集分类算法的准确率,平均准确率为95.83%。本文还指出,所提出的BRF模型有助于解决不存在的后验概率(零值概率),从而提高口腔癌诊断的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Accuracy in Classification Using the Bayesian Relevance Feedback (BRF) Model
In this study, the components of a decision support system (DSS) are discussed. One of the main components is the inference engine (IE). In order to improve the IE in supporting the system's output, Bayesian Relevance Feedback (BRF) model is proposed. This BRF model as suggested has the potential to generate the most relevant target or classes (stage) based on relevance feedback knowledge. Subsequently, eight classifiers: Bayesian Model (BM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Meta MultiClass Classifier (MCC), Rule OneR (OneR), Random Tree (RT), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Naive Bayes (NB), and SMO-Poly Kernel (E-1.O) (SVM) are used in order to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed model. The empirical comparison shows that the BRF significantly improved the accuracy of the entire classification algorithm used for the oral cancer data set with a mean accuracy of 95.83%. It is also noted that the proposed model, BRF contributes to solving the posterior probabilities that do not exist (probability with zero values) in order to improve the decision-making in the oral cancer diagnosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信