迷失在翻译中:传染性安全证明的故障分析

Alberto Battistello, Christophe Giraud
{"title":"迷失在翻译中:传染性安全证明的故障分析","authors":"Alberto Battistello, Christophe Giraud","doi":"10.1109/FDTC.2015.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At FDTC 2014, two new infective countermeasures were suggested to efficiently protect the CRT-RSA against FA. The security of these countermeasures has been translated from the security of their detective counterparts, the latter being proved secure thanks to a formal analysis tool. In this article, we reveal a flaw in the proof of security of the translation. Furthermore, we exhibit several attacks on both infective countermeasures with respect to the very same fault model originally considered. We thus prove that such a methodology does not provide secure results and must not be used to design effective countermeasures.","PeriodicalId":444709,"journal":{"name":"2015 Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lost in Translation: Fault Analysis of Infective Security Proofs\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Battistello, Christophe Giraud\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FDTC.2015.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At FDTC 2014, two new infective countermeasures were suggested to efficiently protect the CRT-RSA against FA. The security of these countermeasures has been translated from the security of their detective counterparts, the latter being proved secure thanks to a formal analysis tool. In this article, we reveal a flaw in the proof of security of the translation. Furthermore, we exhibit several attacks on both infective countermeasures with respect to the very same fault model originally considered. We thus prove that such a methodology does not provide secure results and must not be used to design effective countermeasures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)\",\"volume\":\"280 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FDTC.2015.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FDTC.2015.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在FDTC 2014上,提出了两种新的感染对策来有效地保护CRT-RSA免受FA的侵害。这些对策的安全性是从它们的侦探对应物的安全性翻译过来的,后者由于正式分析工具而被证明是安全的。在本文中,我们揭示了翻译安全性证明中的一个缺陷。此外,我们展示了针对最初考虑的相同故障模型的两种感染对策的几种攻击。因此,我们证明这种方法不能提供安全的结果,不能用于设计有效的对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lost in Translation: Fault Analysis of Infective Security Proofs
At FDTC 2014, two new infective countermeasures were suggested to efficiently protect the CRT-RSA against FA. The security of these countermeasures has been translated from the security of their detective counterparts, the latter being proved secure thanks to a formal analysis tool. In this article, we reveal a flaw in the proof of security of the translation. Furthermore, we exhibit several attacks on both infective countermeasures with respect to the very same fault model originally considered. We thus prove that such a methodology does not provide secure results and must not be used to design effective countermeasures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信