{"title":"迷失在翻译中:传染性安全证明的故障分析","authors":"Alberto Battistello, Christophe Giraud","doi":"10.1109/FDTC.2015.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At FDTC 2014, two new infective countermeasures were suggested to efficiently protect the CRT-RSA against FA. The security of these countermeasures has been translated from the security of their detective counterparts, the latter being proved secure thanks to a formal analysis tool. In this article, we reveal a flaw in the proof of security of the translation. Furthermore, we exhibit several attacks on both infective countermeasures with respect to the very same fault model originally considered. We thus prove that such a methodology does not provide secure results and must not be used to design effective countermeasures.","PeriodicalId":444709,"journal":{"name":"2015 Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lost in Translation: Fault Analysis of Infective Security Proofs\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Battistello, Christophe Giraud\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FDTC.2015.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At FDTC 2014, two new infective countermeasures were suggested to efficiently protect the CRT-RSA against FA. The security of these countermeasures has been translated from the security of their detective counterparts, the latter being proved secure thanks to a formal analysis tool. In this article, we reveal a flaw in the proof of security of the translation. Furthermore, we exhibit several attacks on both infective countermeasures with respect to the very same fault model originally considered. We thus prove that such a methodology does not provide secure results and must not be used to design effective countermeasures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)\",\"volume\":\"280 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FDTC.2015.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Workshop on Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FDTC.2015.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lost in Translation: Fault Analysis of Infective Security Proofs
At FDTC 2014, two new infective countermeasures were suggested to efficiently protect the CRT-RSA against FA. The security of these countermeasures has been translated from the security of their detective counterparts, the latter being proved secure thanks to a formal analysis tool. In this article, we reveal a flaw in the proof of security of the translation. Furthermore, we exhibit several attacks on both infective countermeasures with respect to the very same fault model originally considered. We thus prove that such a methodology does not provide secure results and must not be used to design effective countermeasures.