需求工程中一致性、演进和基本原理管理的正式基础

A. Ghose
{"title":"需求工程中一致性、演进和基本原理管理的正式基础","authors":"A. Ghose","doi":"10.1109/TAI.1999.809769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a formal framework that addresses the twin problems of inconsistencies in requirements specifications and requirements evolution. It presents techniques (building on results from the areas of default reasoning and belief revision) for identifying maximal consistent subsets of a specification rendered inconsistent by a change step, with provision for retaining requirements that would be otherwise discarded, in anticipation of their future reuse. The paper identifies the need for consistent application of requirements rationale and provides support for this in the framework. While the problem of requirements evolution is intractable in the general case, tractable special cases exist within the framework. The paper also provides pointers to designing tools based on this framework.","PeriodicalId":194023,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A formal basis for consistency, evolution and rationale management in requirements engineering\",\"authors\":\"A. Ghose\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAI.1999.809769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a formal framework that addresses the twin problems of inconsistencies in requirements specifications and requirements evolution. It presents techniques (building on results from the areas of default reasoning and belief revision) for identifying maximal consistent subsets of a specification rendered inconsistent by a change step, with provision for retaining requirements that would be otherwise discarded, in anticipation of their future reuse. The paper identifies the need for consistent application of requirements rationale and provides support for this in the framework. While the problem of requirements evolution is intractable in the general case, tractable special cases exist within the framework. The paper also provides pointers to designing tools based on this framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1999.809769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1999.809769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本文提出了一个正式的框架,它解决了需求规范和需求演进中的不一致性这两个问题。它展示了一些技术(建立在默认推理和信念修正领域的结果基础上),用于识别由变更步骤呈现的不一致的规范的最大一致子集,并提供保留需求的准备,否则将被丢弃,以预期它们将来的重用。本文确定了对需求基本原理的一致应用的需要,并在框架中为此提供了支持。虽然需求演变的问题在一般情况下是难以处理的,但是在框架中存在可处理的特殊情况。本文还提供了基于该框架的工具设计指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A formal basis for consistency, evolution and rationale management in requirements engineering
This paper presents a formal framework that addresses the twin problems of inconsistencies in requirements specifications and requirements evolution. It presents techniques (building on results from the areas of default reasoning and belief revision) for identifying maximal consistent subsets of a specification rendered inconsistent by a change step, with provision for retaining requirements that would be otherwise discarded, in anticipation of their future reuse. The paper identifies the need for consistent application of requirements rationale and provides support for this in the framework. While the problem of requirements evolution is intractable in the general case, tractable special cases exist within the framework. The paper also provides pointers to designing tools based on this framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信