NIST基于角色的访问控制模型:走向统一标准

R. Sandhu, David F. Ferraiolo, R. Kuhn
{"title":"NIST基于角色的访问控制模型:走向统一标准","authors":"R. Sandhu, David F. Ferraiolo, R. Kuhn","doi":"10.1145/344287.344301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a unified model for role-based access control (RBAC). RBAC is a proven technology for large-scale authorization. However, lack of a standard model results in uncertainty and confusion about its utility and meaning. The NIST model seeks to resolve this situation by unifying ideas from prior RBAC models, commercial products and research prototypes. It is intended to serve as a foundation for developing future standards. RBAC is a rich and open-ended technology which is evolving as users, researchers and vendors gain experience with it. The NIST model focuses on those aspects of RBAC for which consensus is available. It is organized into four levels of increasing functional capabilities called flat RBAC, hierarchical RBAC, constrained RBAC and symmetric RBAC. These levels are cumulative and each adds exactly one new requirement. An alternate approach comprising flat and hierarchical RBAC in an ordered sequence and two unordered features—constraints and symmetry—is also presented. The paper furthermore identifies important attributes of RBAC not included in the NIST model. Some are not suitable for inclusion in a consensus document. Others require further work and agreement before standardization is feasible.","PeriodicalId":355233,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1033","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The NIST model for role-based access control: towards a unified standard\",\"authors\":\"R. Sandhu, David F. Ferraiolo, R. Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/344287.344301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes a unified model for role-based access control (RBAC). RBAC is a proven technology for large-scale authorization. However, lack of a standard model results in uncertainty and confusion about its utility and meaning. The NIST model seeks to resolve this situation by unifying ideas from prior RBAC models, commercial products and research prototypes. It is intended to serve as a foundation for developing future standards. RBAC is a rich and open-ended technology which is evolving as users, researchers and vendors gain experience with it. The NIST model focuses on those aspects of RBAC for which consensus is available. It is organized into four levels of increasing functional capabilities called flat RBAC, hierarchical RBAC, constrained RBAC and symmetric RBAC. These levels are cumulative and each adds exactly one new requirement. An alternate approach comprising flat and hierarchical RBAC in an ordered sequence and two unordered features—constraints and symmetry—is also presented. The paper furthermore identifies important attributes of RBAC not included in the NIST model. Some are not suitable for inclusion in a consensus document. Others require further work and agreement before standardization is feasible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1033\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/344287.344301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/344287.344301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1033

摘要

本文提出了基于角色的访问控制(RBAC)的统一模型。RBAC是一种经过验证的大规模授权技术。然而,缺乏标准模型会导致其效用和意义的不确定性和混乱。NIST的模型试图通过统一先前RBAC模型、商业产品和研究原型的想法来解决这一问题。它的目的是作为开发未来标准的基础。RBAC是一种丰富而开放的技术,随着用户、研究人员和供应商对它的经验积累,它正在不断发展。NIST模型关注的是RBAC中可以达成共识的那些方面。它被组织成四个级别的功能增强功能,称为扁平RBAC、分层RBAC、约束RBAC和对称RBAC。这些级别是累积的,每个级别都添加了一个新要求。本文还提出了一种由有序序列中的平面和分层RBAC和两个无序特征(约束和对称性)组成的替代方法。本文进一步确定了NIST模型中未包含的RBAC的重要属性。有些不适合列入协商一致文件。另一些则需要进一步的工作和协议才能实现标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The NIST model for role-based access control: towards a unified standard
This paper describes a unified model for role-based access control (RBAC). RBAC is a proven technology for large-scale authorization. However, lack of a standard model results in uncertainty and confusion about its utility and meaning. The NIST model seeks to resolve this situation by unifying ideas from prior RBAC models, commercial products and research prototypes. It is intended to serve as a foundation for developing future standards. RBAC is a rich and open-ended technology which is evolving as users, researchers and vendors gain experience with it. The NIST model focuses on those aspects of RBAC for which consensus is available. It is organized into four levels of increasing functional capabilities called flat RBAC, hierarchical RBAC, constrained RBAC and symmetric RBAC. These levels are cumulative and each adds exactly one new requirement. An alternate approach comprising flat and hierarchical RBAC in an ordered sequence and two unordered features—constraints and symmetry—is also presented. The paper furthermore identifies important attributes of RBAC not included in the NIST model. Some are not suitable for inclusion in a consensus document. Others require further work and agreement before standardization is feasible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信