再现失败或如何在阴影中生存(寻找黑格尔“逻辑科学”的关键-关键2)

A. Sukhno, V. Gulin
{"title":"再现失败或如何在阴影中生存(寻找黑格尔“逻辑科学”的关键-关键2)","authors":"A. Sukhno, V. Gulin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, causes of the complexity of Hegel's philosophical language is being investigated. The authors of the article come to the conclusion that they are not as much individually psychological, as objective, and are associated with the knowledge structure per se, which is obtained in the framework of various scientific disciplines. This knowledge altogether forms a “circle”, and therefore it is not possible to discover its fundamental basis from which knowledge should be derived. This imposes a number of significant restrictions on the operations that can be performed with the concepts of logic. These operations make full use of other research programs, precisely because they avoid the global challenge given by Hegel. Consequently, the ambitiousness of the task, the high stakes associated with it, accompanying its implementation, doom Hegel to use such a philosophical language, which is considered to be “extremely difficult”, “rigid”, “entangled”.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representation failure\\nor How to survive in the realm of shadows\\n(quest for the keys to Hegel’s “Science of Logic” — key No. 2)\",\"authors\":\"A. Sukhno, V. Gulin\",\"doi\":\"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, causes of the complexity of Hegel's philosophical language is being investigated. The authors of the article come to the conclusion that they are not as much individually psychological, as objective, and are associated with the knowledge structure per se, which is obtained in the framework of various scientific disciplines. This knowledge altogether forms a “circle”, and therefore it is not possible to discover its fundamental basis from which knowledge should be derived. This imposes a number of significant restrictions on the operations that can be performed with the concepts of logic. These operations make full use of other research programs, precisely because they avoid the global challenge given by Hegel. Consequently, the ambitiousness of the task, the high stakes associated with it, accompanying its implementation, doom Hegel to use such a philosophical language, which is considered to be “extremely difficult”, “rigid”, “entangled”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox. Philosophical journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox. Philosophical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox. Philosophical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了黑格尔哲学语言复杂性的原因。这篇文章的作者得出的结论是,它们不是个体心理的,而是客观的,并且与知识结构本身有关,而知识结构是在各种科学学科的框架中获得的。这些知识形成了一个“圆圈”,因此不可能发现知识的基本基础。这对可以使用逻辑概念执行的操作施加了许多重要的限制。这些操作充分利用了其他研究项目,正是因为它们避免了黑格尔提出的全球性挑战。因此,这项任务的雄心壮志,与之相关的高风险,伴随着它的实施,注定了黑格尔使用这样一种哲学语言,这被认为是“极其困难的”,“僵化的”,“纠缠的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representation failure or How to survive in the realm of shadows (quest for the keys to Hegel’s “Science of Logic” — key No. 2)
In this paper, causes of the complexity of Hegel's philosophical language is being investigated. The authors of the article come to the conclusion that they are not as much individually psychological, as objective, and are associated with the knowledge structure per se, which is obtained in the framework of various scientific disciplines. This knowledge altogether forms a “circle”, and therefore it is not possible to discover its fundamental basis from which knowledge should be derived. This imposes a number of significant restrictions on the operations that can be performed with the concepts of logic. These operations make full use of other research programs, precisely because they avoid the global challenge given by Hegel. Consequently, the ambitiousness of the task, the high stakes associated with it, accompanying its implementation, doom Hegel to use such a philosophical language, which is considered to be “extremely difficult”, “rigid”, “entangled”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信