{"title":"中卫:跑短流快,安全","authors":"Qingxi Li, M. Dong, Brighten Godfrey","doi":"10.1145/2716281.2836107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interactive applications like web browsing are sensitive to latency. Unfortunately, TCP consumes significant time in its start-up phase and loss recovery. Existing sender-side optimizations use more aggressive start-up strategies to reduce latency, but at the same time they harm safety in the sense that they can damage co-existing flows' performance and potentially the network's overall ability to deliver data. In this paper, we experimentally compare existing solutions' latency performance and more importantly, the trade-off between latency and safety at both the flow level and the application level. We argue that existing solutions are still operating away from the sweet spot on this trade-off plane. Based on the diagnosis of existing solutions, we introduce Halfback, a new short-flow transmission mechanism that operates on a better latency-safety trade-off point: Halfback achieves lower latency than the lowest latency previous solution and at the same time significantly better safety. As Halfback is TCP-friendly and requires only sender-side changes, it is feasible to deploy.","PeriodicalId":169539,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies","volume":"226 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Halfback: running short flows quickly and safely\",\"authors\":\"Qingxi Li, M. Dong, Brighten Godfrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2716281.2836107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interactive applications like web browsing are sensitive to latency. Unfortunately, TCP consumes significant time in its start-up phase and loss recovery. Existing sender-side optimizations use more aggressive start-up strategies to reduce latency, but at the same time they harm safety in the sense that they can damage co-existing flows' performance and potentially the network's overall ability to deliver data. In this paper, we experimentally compare existing solutions' latency performance and more importantly, the trade-off between latency and safety at both the flow level and the application level. We argue that existing solutions are still operating away from the sweet spot on this trade-off plane. Based on the diagnosis of existing solutions, we introduce Halfback, a new short-flow transmission mechanism that operates on a better latency-safety trade-off point: Halfback achieves lower latency than the lowest latency previous solution and at the same time significantly better safety. As Halfback is TCP-friendly and requires only sender-side changes, it is feasible to deploy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies\",\"volume\":\"226 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2716281.2836107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2716281.2836107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interactive applications like web browsing are sensitive to latency. Unfortunately, TCP consumes significant time in its start-up phase and loss recovery. Existing sender-side optimizations use more aggressive start-up strategies to reduce latency, but at the same time they harm safety in the sense that they can damage co-existing flows' performance and potentially the network's overall ability to deliver data. In this paper, we experimentally compare existing solutions' latency performance and more importantly, the trade-off between latency and safety at both the flow level and the application level. We argue that existing solutions are still operating away from the sweet spot on this trade-off plane. Based on the diagnosis of existing solutions, we introduce Halfback, a new short-flow transmission mechanism that operates on a better latency-safety trade-off point: Halfback achieves lower latency than the lowest latency previous solution and at the same time significantly better safety. As Halfback is TCP-friendly and requires only sender-side changes, it is feasible to deploy.