Udo Reinhold Jeck
{"title":"„Virtus cerebri – organum animae“","authors":"Udo Reinhold Jeck","doi":"10.1075/bpjam.00072.jec","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The first part of this essay analyses the beginning of the philosophy of the brain in early Greece by looking at\n the Pythagorean theories of the brain. The knowledge of this innovative achievement of the Pythagorean school was never completely\n lost; it also got through to the Middle Ages.\n The second part focuses on the effect of Pythagorean thinking on Albert the Great. Albert systematically studied\n all available sources on Pythagoreanism and in doing so acquired extensive knowledge of this philosophical movement. In the\n process, he also thought through the psychology of the Pythagoreans and came across their brain theory, which he carefully\n analysed, commented on, and criticised.\n Albert interpreted the brain-theoretical theses of the Pythagoreans that came to his knowledge from the viewpoint\n of a speculative construct of Pythagorean psychology, but in essence his accounts, as the third part of this article proves, match\n the historically secured facts from ancient sources: Albert knew that the Pythagoreans had not only thought out the relationship\n between mind and brain, but had also considered the question, which is so intensely debated today, whether animals think.\n The fourth and final part concludes the investigation by reconstructing the basic lines of Albert’s own brain\n theory: Albert developed a philosophy of the mind which, although allowing a mediated relationship of the intellect with the\n brain, rather emphasised the separation of the mind from the somatic sphere. From his point of view, the brain has no decisive\n function in the thought process. Because the Pythagoreans had thought differently, Albert only took critical note of their\n views.","PeriodicalId":165187,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"328 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00072.jec","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的第一部分通过考察毕达哥拉斯的大脑理论来分析早期希腊大脑哲学的起源。毕达哥拉斯学派这一创新成就的知识从未完全消失;它也一直延续到中世纪。第二部分主要论述毕达哥拉斯思想对阿尔伯特大帝的影响。阿尔伯特系统地研究了有关毕达哥拉斯主义的所有可用资料,并由此获得了有关这一哲学运动的广泛知识。在这个过程中,他还深入思考了毕达哥拉斯学派的心理学,并发现了他们的大脑理论,他仔细地分析、评论和批评了这些理论。阿尔伯特从毕达哥拉斯心理学的思辨建构的观点出发,解释了毕达哥拉斯的脑理论,但从本质上讲,正如本文第三部分所证明的那样,他的叙述与古代资料中有历史依据的事实相吻合:阿尔伯特知道毕达哥拉斯学派不仅思考了精神和大脑之间的关系,而且还考虑了今天激烈争论的问题,即动物是否会思考。第四部分也是最后一部分通过重建阿尔伯特自己的大脑理论的基本路线来总结调查:阿尔伯特发展了一种思想哲学,尽管它允许智力与大脑之间的中介关系,但更强调精神与身体领域的分离。从他的观点来看,大脑在思维过程中没有决定性的作用。因为毕达哥拉斯学派的思想不同,阿尔伯特只对他们的观点作了批判的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
„Virtus cerebri – organum animae“
The first part of this essay analyses the beginning of the philosophy of the brain in early Greece by looking at the Pythagorean theories of the brain. The knowledge of this innovative achievement of the Pythagorean school was never completely lost; it also got through to the Middle Ages. The second part focuses on the effect of Pythagorean thinking on Albert the Great. Albert systematically studied all available sources on Pythagoreanism and in doing so acquired extensive knowledge of this philosophical movement. In the process, he also thought through the psychology of the Pythagoreans and came across their brain theory, which he carefully analysed, commented on, and criticised. Albert interpreted the brain-theoretical theses of the Pythagoreans that came to his knowledge from the viewpoint of a speculative construct of Pythagorean psychology, but in essence his accounts, as the third part of this article proves, match the historically secured facts from ancient sources: Albert knew that the Pythagoreans had not only thought out the relationship between mind and brain, but had also considered the question, which is so intensely debated today, whether animals think. The fourth and final part concludes the investigation by reconstructing the basic lines of Albert’s own brain theory: Albert developed a philosophy of the mind which, although allowing a mediated relationship of the intellect with the brain, rather emphasised the separation of the mind from the somatic sphere. From his point of view, the brain has no decisive function in the thought process. Because the Pythagoreans had thought differently, Albert only took critical note of their views.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信