公共权力机构过失责任问题

D. Fairgrieve, Dan Squires QC
{"title":"公共权力机构过失责任问题","authors":"D. Fairgrieve, Dan Squires QC","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199692552.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a number of reasons the courts have exhibited some wariness about imposing liability on public authorities. They are concerned that the threat of negligence liability might hamper the authority in its attempt to discharge its public duties, or that the limited resources of a public authority should not be spent compensating those whom the authority failed to protect from harm. There is also a concern that decisions about the allocation of public resources should be made not by the courts at all but by the authorities themselves, which are generally answerable to political processes. It is apparent that such consideration does not arise in relation to negligence claims brought against private parties, and this book attempts to examine the principles the courts have formulated to determine how defendants’ liabilities are affected by the fact that they were discharging public obligations at the time of their alleged negligence.","PeriodicalId":147937,"journal":{"name":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem of Public Authority Negligence Liability\",\"authors\":\"D. Fairgrieve, Dan Squires QC\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780199692552.003.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For a number of reasons the courts have exhibited some wariness about imposing liability on public authorities. They are concerned that the threat of negligence liability might hamper the authority in its attempt to discharge its public duties, or that the limited resources of a public authority should not be spent compensating those whom the authority failed to protect from harm. There is also a concern that decisions about the allocation of public resources should be made not by the courts at all but by the authorities themselves, which are generally answerable to political processes. It is apparent that such consideration does not arise in relation to negligence claims brought against private parties, and this book attempts to examine the principles the courts have formulated to determine how defendants’ liabilities are affected by the fact that they were discharging public obligations at the time of their alleged negligence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199692552.003.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199692552.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于一些原因,法院对将责任强加给公共当局表现出一些谨慎。他们关切的是,过失责任的威胁可能妨碍当局履行其公共职责的努力,或者不应将公共当局有限的资源用于赔偿当局未能保护的人免受伤害。还有一种关切是,有关公共资源分配的决定根本不应由法院作出,而应由当局本身作出,而当局一般要对政治进程负责。很明显,这种考虑不会出现在针对私人当事人的过失索赔中,本书试图研究法院制定的原则,以确定被告在其被指控的过失时正在履行公共义务这一事实如何影响被告的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Problem of Public Authority Negligence Liability
For a number of reasons the courts have exhibited some wariness about imposing liability on public authorities. They are concerned that the threat of negligence liability might hamper the authority in its attempt to discharge its public duties, or that the limited resources of a public authority should not be spent compensating those whom the authority failed to protect from harm. There is also a concern that decisions about the allocation of public resources should be made not by the courts at all but by the authorities themselves, which are generally answerable to political processes. It is apparent that such consideration does not arise in relation to negligence claims brought against private parties, and this book attempts to examine the principles the courts have formulated to determine how defendants’ liabilities are affected by the fact that they were discharging public obligations at the time of their alleged negligence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信