美国的决策辅助:患者反应

R. Wexler, Bethany S. Gerstein, Charles D Brackett, L. Fagnan, Kathleen M. Fairfield, D. Frosch, Carmen L. Lewis, L. Morrissey, Leigh H. Simmons, David Swieskowski, Yuchiao Chang, F. J. Fowler, M. Barry
{"title":"美国的决策辅助:患者反应","authors":"R. Wexler, Bethany S. Gerstein, Charles D Brackett, L. Fagnan, Kathleen M. Fairfield, D. Frosch, Carmen L. Lewis, L. Morrissey, Leigh H. Simmons, David Swieskowski, Yuchiao Chang, F. J. Fowler, M. Barry","doi":"10.5750/IJPCM.V5I3.517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  In the United States and elsewhere, a growing chorus of voices is calling for the routine use of patient decision aids (DAs) and shared decision making (SDM) in day-to-day care.  A frequently cited barrier to this approach is the belief that many patients will not be able to understand key clinical information and/or prefer to delegate decision making to providers.  These beliefs, often held by providers, are thought to be particularly applicable to elderly and less educated patients. Objectives: To test the perception that older and less educated patients will not value or benefit from DAs. Research design: Self-administered questionnaires completed by patients after viewing DAs. Subjects: 3001 patients in six primary care practice sites facing one of sixteen common medical decisions. Measures: Amount of DA viewed, knowledge about medical tests or treatments, DA rating, and importance of receiving DAs from providers. Results: Across age and education level, higher self-reported exposure to the DAs was associated with higher knowledge scores. Those over 65 and those who had not attended college had knowledge gains at least has high as those in other groups. There were no statistically significant differences by age or education in patient assessment of the importance of using DAs. Conclusions: Patients in primary care settings in the U.S. learn from DAs, rate them highly, and believe that providers should make them available in ways that are mainly independent of patient age or formal education.","PeriodicalId":402902,"journal":{"name":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Aids in the United States: the Patient Response\",\"authors\":\"R. Wexler, Bethany S. Gerstein, Charles D Brackett, L. Fagnan, Kathleen M. Fairfield, D. Frosch, Carmen L. Lewis, L. Morrissey, Leigh H. Simmons, David Swieskowski, Yuchiao Chang, F. J. Fowler, M. Barry\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/IJPCM.V5I3.517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:  In the United States and elsewhere, a growing chorus of voices is calling for the routine use of patient decision aids (DAs) and shared decision making (SDM) in day-to-day care.  A frequently cited barrier to this approach is the belief that many patients will not be able to understand key clinical information and/or prefer to delegate decision making to providers.  These beliefs, often held by providers, are thought to be particularly applicable to elderly and less educated patients. Objectives: To test the perception that older and less educated patients will not value or benefit from DAs. Research design: Self-administered questionnaires completed by patients after viewing DAs. Subjects: 3001 patients in six primary care practice sites facing one of sixteen common medical decisions. Measures: Amount of DA viewed, knowledge about medical tests or treatments, DA rating, and importance of receiving DAs from providers. Results: Across age and education level, higher self-reported exposure to the DAs was associated with higher knowledge scores. Those over 65 and those who had not attended college had knowledge gains at least has high as those in other groups. There were no statistically significant differences by age or education in patient assessment of the importance of using DAs. Conclusions: Patients in primary care settings in the U.S. learn from DAs, rate them highly, and believe that providers should make them available in ways that are mainly independent of patient age or formal education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V5I3.517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V5I3.517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:在美国和其他地方,越来越多的人呼吁在日常护理中常规使用患者决策辅助(DAs)和共同决策(SDM)。这种方法的一个经常被提到的障碍是,许多患者认为他们无法理解关键的临床信息和/或倾向于将决策权委托给医生。这些观念通常由提供者持有,被认为特别适用于老年和受教育程度较低的患者。目的:验证老年人和受教育程度较低的患者不会重视或受益于DAs的看法。研究设计:患者在看完DAs后自行填写问卷。受试者:3001名患者在6个初级保健诊所面临16个常见的医疗决定之一。衡量标准:看过的DA的数量,关于医学测试或治疗的知识,DA评级,以及从供应商那里接受DA的重要性。结果:在不同的年龄和教育水平上,越高的自我报告的DAs暴露与越高的知识得分相关。65岁以上和没有上过大学的人的知识增益至少比其他群体高。在患者评估使用DAs的重要性方面,年龄或教育程度没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:美国初级保健机构的患者从DAs中学习,高度评价他们,并认为提供者应该以主要独立于患者年龄或正规教育的方式提供它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision Aids in the United States: the Patient Response
Background:  In the United States and elsewhere, a growing chorus of voices is calling for the routine use of patient decision aids (DAs) and shared decision making (SDM) in day-to-day care.  A frequently cited barrier to this approach is the belief that many patients will not be able to understand key clinical information and/or prefer to delegate decision making to providers.  These beliefs, often held by providers, are thought to be particularly applicable to elderly and less educated patients. Objectives: To test the perception that older and less educated patients will not value or benefit from DAs. Research design: Self-administered questionnaires completed by patients after viewing DAs. Subjects: 3001 patients in six primary care practice sites facing one of sixteen common medical decisions. Measures: Amount of DA viewed, knowledge about medical tests or treatments, DA rating, and importance of receiving DAs from providers. Results: Across age and education level, higher self-reported exposure to the DAs was associated with higher knowledge scores. Those over 65 and those who had not attended college had knowledge gains at least has high as those in other groups. There were no statistically significant differences by age or education in patient assessment of the importance of using DAs. Conclusions: Patients in primary care settings in the U.S. learn from DAs, rate them highly, and believe that providers should make them available in ways that are mainly independent of patient age or formal education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信