{"title":"包容与共识","authors":"D. Horowitz","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1s5nzk6.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main theme of this chapter is the tension between an inclusive body embracing a variety of groups, preferences, and interests, on one side, and the need for consensus, on the other. The chapter explores methods of harmonizing both objectives through several institutional approaches. In doing this, it examines critically the meaning of “sufficient consensus” as implemented in the Northern Ireland and South African processes. It also considers the utility of adopting a minimalist constitution if consensus proves to be elusive, and it examines the serious consequences of failures of inclusion and failures of consensus.","PeriodicalId":207254,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Processes and Democratic Commitment","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusion and Consensus\",\"authors\":\"D. Horowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1s5nzk6.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main theme of this chapter is the tension between an inclusive body embracing a variety of groups, preferences, and interests, on one side, and the need for consensus, on the other. The chapter explores methods of harmonizing both objectives through several institutional approaches. In doing this, it examines critically the meaning of “sufficient consensus” as implemented in the Northern Ireland and South African processes. It also considers the utility of adopting a minimalist constitution if consensus proves to be elusive, and it examines the serious consequences of failures of inclusion and failures of consensus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutional Processes and Democratic Commitment\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutional Processes and Democratic Commitment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1s5nzk6.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Processes and Democratic Commitment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1s5nzk6.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The main theme of this chapter is the tension between an inclusive body embracing a variety of groups, preferences, and interests, on one side, and the need for consensus, on the other. The chapter explores methods of harmonizing both objectives through several institutional approaches. In doing this, it examines critically the meaning of “sufficient consensus” as implemented in the Northern Ireland and South African processes. It also considers the utility of adopting a minimalist constitution if consensus proves to be elusive, and it examines the serious consequences of failures of inclusion and failures of consensus.