官僚主义，私人监狱和刑罚改革的未来

Buffalo Criminal Law Review Pub Date : 2003-04-01 DOI:10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.275

Sarah Armstrong

{"title":"官僚主义，私人监狱和刑罚改革的未来","authors":"Sarah Armstrong","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses the private prisons debate to explore the legitimacy and accountability of prison generally. Attempts to determine the superiority (or inferiority) of private prisons cannot be resovled because of the normative and operational ambiguity of prison as a form of punishment. Instead this debate obscures the spread of a particular bureaucratic rationality in contemporary punishment that facilitates the expansion of prisons.","PeriodicalId":344882,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bureaucracy, Private Prisons and the Future of Penal Reform\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses the private prisons debate to explore the legitimacy and accountability of prison generally. Attempts to determine the superiority (or inferiority) of private prisons cannot be resovled because of the normative and operational ambiguity of prison as a form of punishment. Instead this debate obscures the spread of a particular bureaucratic rationality in contemporary punishment that facilitates the expansion of prisons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buffalo Criminal Law Review\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buffalo Criminal Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2003.7.1.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

摘要

本文以私人监狱之争为例，从总体上探讨监狱的合法性和问责性。由于监狱作为一种惩罚形式在规范和操作上的模糊性，确定私立监狱优劣的尝试无法得到解决。相反，这场辩论掩盖了一种特殊的官僚理性在当代惩罚中的传播，这种理性促进了监狱的扩张。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Bureaucracy, Private Prisons and the Future of Penal Reform

This paper uses the private prisons debate to explore the legitimacy and accountability of prison generally. Attempts to determine the superiority (or inferiority) of private prisons cannot be resovled because of the normative and operational ambiguity of prison as a form of punishment. Instead this debate obscures the spread of a particular bureaucratic rationality in contemporary punishment that facilitates the expansion of prisons.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Buffalo Criminal Law Review

自引率

0.00%

发文量