通过小蜂窝数据卸载提高容量:LTE飞蜂窝和Wi-Fi的性能比较研究

Andra M. Voicu, L. Simić, M. Petrova
{"title":"通过小蜂窝数据卸载提高容量:LTE飞蜂窝和Wi-Fi的性能比较研究","authors":"Andra M. Voicu, L. Simić, M. Petrova","doi":"10.1109/GLOCOMW.2014.7063603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the significant increase in mobile data traffic volume during the last few years, offloading techniques have been considered for alleviating the traffic load from cellular networks. Two principal small cell offloading solutions are LTE femtocells and Wi-Fi. Femtocells are low power user-deployed LTE base stations that overlay the macro-cellular network and share its licensed spectrum, whereas Wi-Fi devices operate in unlicensed bands using the distributed CSMA/CA MAC protocol to coordinate neighbouring transmissions. Given the fundamentally different spectrum use regulations, MAC, and PHY layer capabilities of these two technologies, the resulting interference environments of the respective small cell networks are significantly different. It is thus not trivially obvious which offloading solution realistically provides a better and future-proof capacity extension for service providers. In this paper we present a thorough system-level comparative study of IEEE 802.1 In Wi-Fi against LTE femtocell performance for a range of representative network densities and deployment scenarios, considering realistic propagation effects, multiple interference sources, and several resource allocation schemes. Our results show that in low density suburban and rural scenarios the high spectral efficiency of LTE femtocells yields a higher throughput than Wi-Fi, but that the CSMA/CA MAC protocol enables Wi-Fi to outperform LTE femtocells in dense urban scenarios, where the need for extra capacity is most urgent. We show that future high density heterogeneous networks may be best served by a new hybrid small cell offloading solution, combining the superior PHY of LTE and the distributed co-tier interference coordination afforded by the MAC of Wi-Fi.","PeriodicalId":354340,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosting capacity through small cell data offloading: A comparative performance study of LTE femtocells and Wi-Fi\",\"authors\":\"Andra M. Voicu, L. Simić, M. Petrova\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GLOCOMW.2014.7063603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the significant increase in mobile data traffic volume during the last few years, offloading techniques have been considered for alleviating the traffic load from cellular networks. Two principal small cell offloading solutions are LTE femtocells and Wi-Fi. Femtocells are low power user-deployed LTE base stations that overlay the macro-cellular network and share its licensed spectrum, whereas Wi-Fi devices operate in unlicensed bands using the distributed CSMA/CA MAC protocol to coordinate neighbouring transmissions. Given the fundamentally different spectrum use regulations, MAC, and PHY layer capabilities of these two technologies, the resulting interference environments of the respective small cell networks are significantly different. It is thus not trivially obvious which offloading solution realistically provides a better and future-proof capacity extension for service providers. In this paper we present a thorough system-level comparative study of IEEE 802.1 In Wi-Fi against LTE femtocell performance for a range of representative network densities and deployment scenarios, considering realistic propagation effects, multiple interference sources, and several resource allocation schemes. Our results show that in low density suburban and rural scenarios the high spectral efficiency of LTE femtocells yields a higher throughput than Wi-Fi, but that the CSMA/CA MAC protocol enables Wi-Fi to outperform LTE femtocells in dense urban scenarios, where the need for extra capacity is most urgent. We show that future high density heterogeneous networks may be best served by a new hybrid small cell offloading solution, combining the superior PHY of LTE and the distributed co-tier interference coordination afforded by the MAC of Wi-Fi.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2014.7063603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2014.7063603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

由于移动数据流量在过去几年中显著增加,卸载技术已被考虑用于减轻来自蜂窝网络的流量负载。两个主要的小型基站卸载解决方案是LTE飞蜂窝和Wi-Fi。Femtocells是低功耗用户部署的LTE基站,覆盖宏蜂窝网络并共享其许可频谱,而Wi-Fi设备使用分布式CSMA/CA MAC协议在未经许可的频段上运行,以协调相邻的传输。考虑到这两种技术的频谱使用规则、MAC和物理层功能的根本不同,由此产生的各自小蜂窝网络的干扰环境也有很大不同。因此,卸载解决方案实际上为服务提供商提供了更好的、面向未来的容量扩展,这一点并不明显。在本文中,我们对IEEE 802.1 In Wi-Fi和LTE femtocell性能在一系列代表性网络密度和部署场景下进行了全面的系统级比较研究,考虑了现实的传播效应、多个干扰源和几种资源分配方案。我们的研究结果表明,在低密度的郊区和农村场景中,LTE飞蜂窝的高频谱效率产生比Wi-Fi更高的吞吐量,但CSMA/CA MAC协议使Wi-Fi在对额外容量需求最为迫切的密集城市场景中优于LTE飞蜂窝。我们表明,结合LTE的优越PHY和Wi-Fi的MAC提供的分布式协层干扰协调,一种新的混合小蜂窝卸载解决方案可以最好地服务于未来的高密度异构网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Boosting capacity through small cell data offloading: A comparative performance study of LTE femtocells and Wi-Fi
Due to the significant increase in mobile data traffic volume during the last few years, offloading techniques have been considered for alleviating the traffic load from cellular networks. Two principal small cell offloading solutions are LTE femtocells and Wi-Fi. Femtocells are low power user-deployed LTE base stations that overlay the macro-cellular network and share its licensed spectrum, whereas Wi-Fi devices operate in unlicensed bands using the distributed CSMA/CA MAC protocol to coordinate neighbouring transmissions. Given the fundamentally different spectrum use regulations, MAC, and PHY layer capabilities of these two technologies, the resulting interference environments of the respective small cell networks are significantly different. It is thus not trivially obvious which offloading solution realistically provides a better and future-proof capacity extension for service providers. In this paper we present a thorough system-level comparative study of IEEE 802.1 In Wi-Fi against LTE femtocell performance for a range of representative network densities and deployment scenarios, considering realistic propagation effects, multiple interference sources, and several resource allocation schemes. Our results show that in low density suburban and rural scenarios the high spectral efficiency of LTE femtocells yields a higher throughput than Wi-Fi, but that the CSMA/CA MAC protocol enables Wi-Fi to outperform LTE femtocells in dense urban scenarios, where the need for extra capacity is most urgent. We show that future high density heterogeneous networks may be best served by a new hybrid small cell offloading solution, combining the superior PHY of LTE and the distributed co-tier interference coordination afforded by the MAC of Wi-Fi.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信