罗尔斯与宗教:在合理宗教制度的体面与正义之间

H. Haidar
{"title":"罗尔斯与宗教:在合理宗教制度的体面与正义之间","authors":"H. Haidar","doi":"10.1177/1743453X0600200105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examines Rawls's view on the dencency of some religious regimes, and argues that his methodology requires his approval of the justice of some religious regimes, rather than merely their decency.","PeriodicalId":381236,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Ethics Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rawls and Religion: Between the Decency and Justice of Reasonable Religious Regimes\",\"authors\":\"H. Haidar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1743453X0600200105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Examines Rawls's view on the dencency of some religious regimes, and argues that his methodology requires his approval of the justice of some religious regimes, rather than merely their decency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0600200105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Ethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0600200105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

考察罗尔斯对某些宗教政体的倾斜性的看法,并论证他的方法论要求他认可某些宗教政体的正义性,而不仅仅是它们的体面性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rawls and Religion: Between the Decency and Justice of Reasonable Religious Regimes
Examines Rawls's view on the dencency of some religious regimes, and argues that his methodology requires his approval of the justice of some religious regimes, rather than merely their decency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信