净现值法与内部收益率法在公司投资决策中的应用与比较

Jinqiao Huang, Jianwen Tong, Peini Wang, Xilin Zheng
{"title":"净现值法与内部收益率法在公司投资决策中的应用与比较","authors":"Jinqiao Huang, Jianwen Tong, Peini Wang, Xilin Zheng","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to find out the application conditions of Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) in practice, based on previous studies, the paper summarized the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods and explores the specific application conditions in corporate finance. The results showed that the NPV method can reflect the liquidity and overall profitability of investment, provide clear expectations, and be more comprehensive in risk measurement. However, the NPV method could not avoid the problem of cash flow uncertainty. Moreover, the opportunity cost is limited by the project and corporate transparency. It was also found that the IRR method can easily calculate the rate of return on investment and compare it with the industry benchmark return on investment, which has been widely used by practitioners. However, the IRR method may produce multiple values when the cash flow is not a fixed annuity, and the IRR is a ratio that cannot reflect the actual profit. Therefore, several modified NPV and IRR methods were introduced and discussed with their application conditions. In practice, to be noted, there may be inconsistencies between NPV and IRR for investment evaluation. Although both NPV and IRR are effective methods for company investment decisions, it is suggested that, the investment situations should firstly be analyzed before making decision of which methods to be chosen.","PeriodicalId":333050,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022)","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application and Comparison of NPV and IRR Methods in the Company Investment Decision\",\"authors\":\"Jinqiao Huang, Jianwen Tong, Peini Wang, Xilin Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to find out the application conditions of Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) in practice, based on previous studies, the paper summarized the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods and explores the specific application conditions in corporate finance. The results showed that the NPV method can reflect the liquidity and overall profitability of investment, provide clear expectations, and be more comprehensive in risk measurement. However, the NPV method could not avoid the problem of cash flow uncertainty. Moreover, the opportunity cost is limited by the project and corporate transparency. It was also found that the IRR method can easily calculate the rate of return on investment and compare it with the industry benchmark return on investment, which has been widely used by practitioners. However, the IRR method may produce multiple values when the cash flow is not a fixed annuity, and the IRR is a ratio that cannot reflect the actual profit. Therefore, several modified NPV and IRR methods were introduced and discussed with their application conditions. In practice, to be noted, there may be inconsistencies between NPV and IRR for investment evaluation. Although both NPV and IRR are effective methods for company investment decisions, it is suggested that, the investment situations should firstly be analyzed before making decision of which methods to be chosen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022)\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了找出净现值(NPV)和内部收益率(IRR)在实践中的应用条件,本文在前人研究的基础上,总结了两种方法的优缺点,并探讨了两种方法在企业财务中的具体应用条件。结果表明,NPV法可以反映投资的流动性和整体盈利能力,提供明确的预期,在风险度量方面更加全面。然而,净现值法无法避免现金流量的不确定性问题。此外,机会成本受到项目和公司透明度的限制。研究还发现,IRR方法可以方便地计算投资回报率,并与行业基准投资回报率进行比较,已被从业者广泛使用。但是,当现金流不是固定年金时,IRR法可能产生多个值,IRR是一个不能反映实际利润的比率。因此,介绍了几种改进的NPV和IRR方法,并讨论了它们的应用条件。在实践中,需要注意的是,投资评价的NPV和IRR之间可能存在不一致的情况。虽然NPV和IRR都是公司投资决策的有效方法,但建议先对投资情况进行分析,再决定采用哪种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application and Comparison of NPV and IRR Methods in the Company Investment Decision
In order to find out the application conditions of Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) in practice, based on previous studies, the paper summarized the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods and explores the specific application conditions in corporate finance. The results showed that the NPV method can reflect the liquidity and overall profitability of investment, provide clear expectations, and be more comprehensive in risk measurement. However, the NPV method could not avoid the problem of cash flow uncertainty. Moreover, the opportunity cost is limited by the project and corporate transparency. It was also found that the IRR method can easily calculate the rate of return on investment and compare it with the industry benchmark return on investment, which has been widely used by practitioners. However, the IRR method may produce multiple values when the cash flow is not a fixed annuity, and the IRR is a ratio that cannot reflect the actual profit. Therefore, several modified NPV and IRR methods were introduced and discussed with their application conditions. In practice, to be noted, there may be inconsistencies between NPV and IRR for investment evaluation. Although both NPV and IRR are effective methods for company investment decisions, it is suggested that, the investment situations should firstly be analyzed before making decision of which methods to be chosen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信