{"title":"学术讲坛自由中公证契约的保密性","authors":"Reni Margiyanti, T. Negara, R. I. R. Sjafi’i","doi":"10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many academic community members abuse the academic pulpit's freedom for inappropriate purposes. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the conflict or conflict of norms in the Article related to the obligation of a Notary to keep everything regarding the Deed he made and the explanation of the Article associated with the freedom of the academic pulpit (Article 8 Paragraph (1), Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 the Year 2012), in the Republic of Indonesia. On the one hand, a notary must keep everything about the deed he made secret; on the other hand, a notary who is a teaching staff or lecturer must carry out his duties as an academic civitas. This writing uses a normative juridical method with a statute and conceptual approach. The results obtained are that the position of a notary is higher than the position of a notary as a lecturer; therefore, the notary's limitations regarding the academic pulpit are to the position of a notary as a public official, whereas a public official a notary is obliged to keep everything related to the deed he made, which means that he has been ordered to a notary. Not to give, show or notify the act’s contents except those with a direct interest. Therefore, regulators should study further if there is a conflict of norms in the Articles related to the Notary's obligation to keep everything confidential regarding the Deed he made.How to cite item: Margiyanti, R., Negara, T, A, S.,. Sjafi’i, R, I, R., (2022), Confidentiality of the notary deed in the freedom of the academic pulpit. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2). 184-193. doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5735.","PeriodicalId":207438,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confidentiality of the notary deed in the freedom of the academic pulpit\",\"authors\":\"Reni Margiyanti, T. Negara, R. I. R. Sjafi’i\",\"doi\":\"10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many academic community members abuse the academic pulpit's freedom for inappropriate purposes. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the conflict or conflict of norms in the Article related to the obligation of a Notary to keep everything regarding the Deed he made and the explanation of the Article associated with the freedom of the academic pulpit (Article 8 Paragraph (1), Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 the Year 2012), in the Republic of Indonesia. On the one hand, a notary must keep everything about the deed he made secret; on the other hand, a notary who is a teaching staff or lecturer must carry out his duties as an academic civitas. This writing uses a normative juridical method with a statute and conceptual approach. The results obtained are that the position of a notary is higher than the position of a notary as a lecturer; therefore, the notary's limitations regarding the academic pulpit are to the position of a notary as a public official, whereas a public official a notary is obliged to keep everything related to the deed he made, which means that he has been ordered to a notary. Not to give, show or notify the act’s contents except those with a direct interest. Therefore, regulators should study further if there is a conflict of norms in the Articles related to the Notary's obligation to keep everything confidential regarding the Deed he made.How to cite item: Margiyanti, R., Negara, T, A, S.,. Sjafi’i, R, I, R., (2022), Confidentiality of the notary deed in the freedom of the academic pulpit. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2). 184-193. doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5735.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
许多学术团体成员滥用学术讲坛的自由以达到不正当的目的。本文的目的是分析与印度尼西亚共和国公证人保留其所做契约的一切义务相关的条款中规范的冲突或冲突,以及与学术讲坛自由相关的条款的解释(印度尼西亚共和国2012年第12号法律第8条第1款)。一方面,公证人必须对他所做的一切保密;另一方面,作为教员或者讲师的公证员必须履行学术公民的职责。这篇文章使用了规范性的法律方法和法规和概念方法。所得结果为:公证员的地位高于讲师的地位;因此,公证员对学术讲坛的限制是公证员作为公职人员的地位,而公职人员作为公证员有义务保留与他所做的行为有关的一切,这意味着他已经被命令为公证员。除直接利害关系外,不给予、展示、通知行为内容。因此,监管机构应进一步研究章程中有关公证人对其所作契约的一切保密义务的规范是否存在冲突。如何引用条目:Margiyanti, R., Negara, T ., A ., S.,Sjafi 'i, R, I, R.,(2022),学术讲坛自由中公证契约的保密性。中华医学杂志,13(2)。184 - 193。doi: 10.26905 / idjch.v13i2.5735。
Confidentiality of the notary deed in the freedom of the academic pulpit
Many academic community members abuse the academic pulpit's freedom for inappropriate purposes. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the conflict or conflict of norms in the Article related to the obligation of a Notary to keep everything regarding the Deed he made and the explanation of the Article associated with the freedom of the academic pulpit (Article 8 Paragraph (1), Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 the Year 2012), in the Republic of Indonesia. On the one hand, a notary must keep everything about the deed he made secret; on the other hand, a notary who is a teaching staff or lecturer must carry out his duties as an academic civitas. This writing uses a normative juridical method with a statute and conceptual approach. The results obtained are that the position of a notary is higher than the position of a notary as a lecturer; therefore, the notary's limitations regarding the academic pulpit are to the position of a notary as a public official, whereas a public official a notary is obliged to keep everything related to the deed he made, which means that he has been ordered to a notary. Not to give, show or notify the act’s contents except those with a direct interest. Therefore, regulators should study further if there is a conflict of norms in the Articles related to the Notary's obligation to keep everything confidential regarding the Deed he made.How to cite item: Margiyanti, R., Negara, T, A, S.,. Sjafi’i, R, I, R., (2022), Confidentiality of the notary deed in the freedom of the academic pulpit. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2). 184-193. doi:10.26905/idjch.v13i2.5735.