早期开颅夹持减压术与线圈栓塞后开颅减压术手术效果的比较研究

Jessie Choi, I. Park
{"title":"早期开颅夹持减压术与线圈栓塞后开颅减压术手术效果的比较研究","authors":"Jessie Choi, I. Park","doi":"10.51638/jksgn.2021.00129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is caused by rupture of an intracranial aneurysm and has high morbidity and mortality. Cases of poor grade aSAH have even higher morbidity and mortality [1–3]. Poor grade aSAH refers to modified Fisher grade 3 or higher and Hunt and Hess (H-H) grade 4 or higher aSAH. In Objective: Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has high morbidity and mortality, even when emergency treatment such as decompressive craniectomy (DC), coil embolization, or clipping is performed. The best treatment for acute aSAH, especially in poor-grade aSAH patients, has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment methods in these patients in order to suggest the best treatment method. Methods: We compared 130 patients with poor-grade aSAH who underwent DC with clipping or coiling (clipping, 102 patients; coiling, 28 patients). We compared functional outcome, mortality, and the time interval between admission and DC surgery between the clipping and coiling groups. Results: There was a significant difference in functional outcomes (modified Rankin score [mRS]) between the clipping and coiling groups. The mean mRS at discharge in the clipping and coil groups was 4.824 and 5.214, respectively (P=0.049). The time interval until DC surgery was also significantly different (161 and 481 minutes in the clipping and coiling groups, respectively; P=0.003). No significant difference was found in mortality between the 2 groups (P=0.301). Conclusion: DC might be helpful for severe brain edema and intracranial pressure control. This procedure was more effective when performed with clipping than with coil embolization. DC with clipping showed better functional outcomes, lower mortality, and more favorable outcomes than DC with coil embolization. This demonstrates that aggressive surgical treatment can be helpful for poorgrade aSAH patients.","PeriodicalId":161607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of surgical outcomes between early decompressive craniectomy with clipping and coil embolization followed by decompressive craniectomy\",\"authors\":\"Jessie Choi, I. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.51638/jksgn.2021.00129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is caused by rupture of an intracranial aneurysm and has high morbidity and mortality. Cases of poor grade aSAH have even higher morbidity and mortality [1–3]. Poor grade aSAH refers to modified Fisher grade 3 or higher and Hunt and Hess (H-H) grade 4 or higher aSAH. In Objective: Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has high morbidity and mortality, even when emergency treatment such as decompressive craniectomy (DC), coil embolization, or clipping is performed. The best treatment for acute aSAH, especially in poor-grade aSAH patients, has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment methods in these patients in order to suggest the best treatment method. Methods: We compared 130 patients with poor-grade aSAH who underwent DC with clipping or coiling (clipping, 102 patients; coiling, 28 patients). We compared functional outcome, mortality, and the time interval between admission and DC surgery between the clipping and coiling groups. Results: There was a significant difference in functional outcomes (modified Rankin score [mRS]) between the clipping and coiling groups. The mean mRS at discharge in the clipping and coil groups was 4.824 and 5.214, respectively (P=0.049). The time interval until DC surgery was also significantly different (161 and 481 minutes in the clipping and coiling groups, respectively; P=0.003). No significant difference was found in mortality between the 2 groups (P=0.301). Conclusion: DC might be helpful for severe brain edema and intracranial pressure control. This procedure was more effective when performed with clipping than with coil embolization. DC with clipping showed better functional outcomes, lower mortality, and more favorable outcomes than DC with coil embolization. This demonstrates that aggressive surgical treatment can be helpful for poorgrade aSAH patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51638/jksgn.2021.00129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51638/jksgn.2021.00129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)是由颅内动脉瘤破裂引起的,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。低度aSAH的发病率和死亡率更高[1-3]。低分级aSAH是指Fisher 3级及以上和Hunt and Hess (H-H) 4级及以上的aSAH。目的:低级别动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)具有很高的发病率和死亡率,即使在进行减压颅骨切除术(DC)、螺旋栓塞或夹闭等紧急治疗时也是如此。急性aSAH的最佳治疗方法,特别是对低度aSAH患者,尚未确定。本研究的目的是评价这些患者的治疗方法,以提出最佳的治疗方法。方法:我们比较了130例接受DC并夹持或卷取的低度aSAH患者(夹持,102例;盘绕,28例)。我们比较了夹持组和盘绕组的功能结局、死亡率和入院至DC手术的时间间隔。结果:夹持组和卷取组在功能预后(改良Rankin评分[mRS])方面存在显著差异。夹片组和线圈组放电时平均mRS分别为4.824和5.214 (P=0.049)。到DC手术的时间间隔也有显著差异(夹持组和盘绕组分别为161分钟和481分钟;P = 0.003)。两组患者死亡率差异无统计学意义(P=0.301)。结论:DC对重度脑水肿及颅内压控制有一定的治疗作用。与线圈栓塞相比,夹钳栓塞更有效。与线圈栓塞的DC相比,夹持DC表现出更好的功能预后、更低的死亡率和更有利的结果。这表明积极的手术治疗对不良aSAH患者有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of surgical outcomes between early decompressive craniectomy with clipping and coil embolization followed by decompressive craniectomy
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is caused by rupture of an intracranial aneurysm and has high morbidity and mortality. Cases of poor grade aSAH have even higher morbidity and mortality [1–3]. Poor grade aSAH refers to modified Fisher grade 3 or higher and Hunt and Hess (H-H) grade 4 or higher aSAH. In Objective: Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has high morbidity and mortality, even when emergency treatment such as decompressive craniectomy (DC), coil embolization, or clipping is performed. The best treatment for acute aSAH, especially in poor-grade aSAH patients, has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment methods in these patients in order to suggest the best treatment method. Methods: We compared 130 patients with poor-grade aSAH who underwent DC with clipping or coiling (clipping, 102 patients; coiling, 28 patients). We compared functional outcome, mortality, and the time interval between admission and DC surgery between the clipping and coiling groups. Results: There was a significant difference in functional outcomes (modified Rankin score [mRS]) between the clipping and coiling groups. The mean mRS at discharge in the clipping and coil groups was 4.824 and 5.214, respectively (P=0.049). The time interval until DC surgery was also significantly different (161 and 481 minutes in the clipping and coiling groups, respectively; P=0.003). No significant difference was found in mortality between the 2 groups (P=0.301). Conclusion: DC might be helpful for severe brain edema and intracranial pressure control. This procedure was more effective when performed with clipping than with coil embolization. DC with clipping showed better functional outcomes, lower mortality, and more favorable outcomes than DC with coil embolization. This demonstrates that aggressive surgical treatment can be helpful for poorgrade aSAH patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信