互联网设备为何易受攻击?系统管理员调查

T. Bondar, Hala Assal, A. Abdou
{"title":"互联网设备为何易受攻击?系统管理员调查","authors":"T. Bondar, Hala Assal, A. Abdou","doi":"10.14722/madweb.2023.23043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—In efforts to understand the reasons behind Internet-connected devices remaining vulnerable for a long time, previous literature analyzed the effectiveness of large-scale vul- nerability notifications on remediation rates. Herein we focus on the perspective of system administrators. Through an online sur- vey study with 89 system administrators worldwide, we investigate factors affecting their decisions to remediate or ignore a security vulnerability. We use Censys to find servers with vulnerable public-facing services, extract the abuse contact information from WHOIS, and email an invitation to fill out the survey. We found no evidence that awareness of the existence of a vulnerability affects remediation plans, which explains the consistently small remediation rates following notification campaigns conducted in previous research. More interestingly, participants did not agree on a specific factor as the primary cause for lack of remediation. Many factors appeared roughly equally important, including backwards compatibility, technical knowledge, available resources, and motive to remediate.","PeriodicalId":205270,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2023 Workshop on Measurements, Attacks, and Defenses for the Web","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do Internet Devices Remain Vulnerable? A Survey with System Administrators\",\"authors\":\"T. Bondar, Hala Assal, A. Abdou\",\"doi\":\"10.14722/madweb.2023.23043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"—In efforts to understand the reasons behind Internet-connected devices remaining vulnerable for a long time, previous literature analyzed the effectiveness of large-scale vul- nerability notifications on remediation rates. Herein we focus on the perspective of system administrators. Through an online sur- vey study with 89 system administrators worldwide, we investigate factors affecting their decisions to remediate or ignore a security vulnerability. We use Censys to find servers with vulnerable public-facing services, extract the abuse contact information from WHOIS, and email an invitation to fill out the survey. We found no evidence that awareness of the existence of a vulnerability affects remediation plans, which explains the consistently small remediation rates following notification campaigns conducted in previous research. More interestingly, participants did not agree on a specific factor as the primary cause for lack of remediation. Many factors appeared roughly equally important, including backwards compatibility, technical knowledge, available resources, and motive to remediate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2023 Workshop on Measurements, Attacks, and Defenses for the Web\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2023 Workshop on Measurements, Attacks, and Defenses for the Web\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14722/madweb.2023.23043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2023 Workshop on Measurements, Attacks, and Defenses for the Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14722/madweb.2023.23043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了理解互联网连接设备长期存在漏洞背后的原因,之前的文献分析了大规模漏洞通知对修复率的有效性。在这里,我们关注系统管理员的视角。通过对全球89位系统管理员的在线调查研究,我们调查了影响他们决定修复或忽略安全漏洞的因素。我们使用Censys查找具有易受攻击的面向公众服务的服务器,从WHOIS中提取滥用联系信息,并通过电子邮件邀请填写调查。我们没有发现任何证据表明意识到漏洞的存在会影响补救计划,这就解释了在之前的研究中,在通知活动之后,补救率一直很低。更有趣的是,参与者没有同意一个具体的因素是缺乏补救的主要原因。许多因素似乎同样重要,包括向后兼容性、技术知识、可用资源和修复的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why do Internet Devices Remain Vulnerable? A Survey with System Administrators
—In efforts to understand the reasons behind Internet-connected devices remaining vulnerable for a long time, previous literature analyzed the effectiveness of large-scale vul- nerability notifications on remediation rates. Herein we focus on the perspective of system administrators. Through an online sur- vey study with 89 system administrators worldwide, we investigate factors affecting their decisions to remediate or ignore a security vulnerability. We use Censys to find servers with vulnerable public-facing services, extract the abuse contact information from WHOIS, and email an invitation to fill out the survey. We found no evidence that awareness of the existence of a vulnerability affects remediation plans, which explains the consistently small remediation rates following notification campaigns conducted in previous research. More interestingly, participants did not agree on a specific factor as the primary cause for lack of remediation. Many factors appeared roughly equally important, including backwards compatibility, technical knowledge, available resources, and motive to remediate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信