鲁莽

M. Sawyer
{"title":"鲁莽","authors":"M. Sawyer","doi":"10.4324/9780429270086-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will initially define mens rea recklessness, using leading case judgments to distinguish objective and subjective recklessness within English criminal law. This will be followed by a concise explanation of the reasons used to judge those cases, concluding with discussion and consideration of the choice made by the House of Lords to reject the Caldwell meaning in lieu of the one adopted in RvG . 1 2","PeriodicalId":132093,"journal":{"name":"Unorthodox Strategies for the Everyday Warrior","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recklessness\",\"authors\":\"M. Sawyer\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429270086-46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article will initially define mens rea recklessness, using leading case judgments to distinguish objective and subjective recklessness within English criminal law. This will be followed by a concise explanation of the reasons used to judge those cases, concluding with discussion and consideration of the choice made by the House of Lords to reject the Caldwell meaning in lieu of the one adopted in RvG . 1 2\",\"PeriodicalId\":132093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unorthodox Strategies for the Everyday Warrior\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unorthodox Strategies for the Everyday Warrior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429270086-46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unorthodox Strategies for the Everyday Warrior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429270086-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将初步界定实质鲁莽行为,并运用主导判例区分英国刑法中的客观鲁莽行为和主观鲁莽行为。随后将简要解释用于判断这些案件的原因,最后讨论和考虑上议院拒绝考德威尔含义而不是RvG采用的含义的选择。1 2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recklessness
This article will initially define mens rea recklessness, using leading case judgments to distinguish objective and subjective recklessness within English criminal law. This will be followed by a concise explanation of the reasons used to judge those cases, concluding with discussion and consideration of the choice made by the House of Lords to reject the Caldwell meaning in lieu of the one adopted in RvG . 1 2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信