激光雷达室内定位技术研究

Pengrui Gao, Jijiang Xu, Ruijun Jing, Zhiguo Zhao, Wenhao Zhang, Feifei Zhang
{"title":"激光雷达室内定位技术研究","authors":"Pengrui Gao, Jijiang Xu, Ruijun Jing, Zhiguo Zhao, Wenhao Zhang, Feifei Zhang","doi":"10.1109/icccs55155.2022.9846358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single-line laser radar has been widely used in indoor positioning. The existing SLAM is restricted by algorithm complexity, scene and other factors. In view of this, this paper studies the comparative study of hardware and power consumption of the four existing SLAM algorithms, namely, Gmapping, Hector, Karto and Cartographer. A smart car based on Cortex-A53 raspberry board is built to realize the composition and positioning function of SLAM algorithm. Using Gmapping, Hector, Karto, Cartographer four algorithms for indoor environment lobby, corridor, classroom, laboratory monocular radar SLAM scanning mapping, monitoring its voltage, current changes, composition speed three parameters. The results show that in the case of corridor, Gmapping algorithm is the optimal choice; in the case of hall composition, Gmapping algorithm is the optimal choice; in the case of classroom composition, Cartographer algorithm is the best choice; in conventional laboratory conditions, Gmapping algorithm is the best choice.","PeriodicalId":121713,"journal":{"name":"2022 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on Laser Radar Indoor Positioning\",\"authors\":\"Pengrui Gao, Jijiang Xu, Ruijun Jing, Zhiguo Zhao, Wenhao Zhang, Feifei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/icccs55155.2022.9846358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Single-line laser radar has been widely used in indoor positioning. The existing SLAM is restricted by algorithm complexity, scene and other factors. In view of this, this paper studies the comparative study of hardware and power consumption of the four existing SLAM algorithms, namely, Gmapping, Hector, Karto and Cartographer. A smart car based on Cortex-A53 raspberry board is built to realize the composition and positioning function of SLAM algorithm. Using Gmapping, Hector, Karto, Cartographer four algorithms for indoor environment lobby, corridor, classroom, laboratory monocular radar SLAM scanning mapping, monitoring its voltage, current changes, composition speed three parameters. The results show that in the case of corridor, Gmapping algorithm is the optimal choice; in the case of hall composition, Gmapping algorithm is the optimal choice; in the case of classroom composition, Cartographer algorithm is the best choice; in conventional laboratory conditions, Gmapping algorithm is the best choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/icccs55155.2022.9846358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icccs55155.2022.9846358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单线激光雷达已广泛应用于室内定位。现有的SLAM算法受到算法复杂度、场景等因素的限制。鉴于此,本文对现有的四种SLAM算法gapping、Hector、Karto和Cartographer的硬件和功耗进行了比较研究。构建了一种基于Cortex-A53树莓板的智能小车,实现了SLAM算法的构图和定位功能。利用gapping、Hector、Karto、Cartographer四种算法对室内环境进行大厅、走廊、教室、实验室的单目雷达SLAM扫描测绘,监测其电压、电流变化、构图速度三个参数。结果表明:在走廊情况下,gmap算法是最优选择;在大厅构成的情况下,gapping算法是最优选择;在课堂作文的情况下,Cartographer算法是最佳选择;在常规实验室条件下,gapping算法是最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on Laser Radar Indoor Positioning
Single-line laser radar has been widely used in indoor positioning. The existing SLAM is restricted by algorithm complexity, scene and other factors. In view of this, this paper studies the comparative study of hardware and power consumption of the four existing SLAM algorithms, namely, Gmapping, Hector, Karto and Cartographer. A smart car based on Cortex-A53 raspberry board is built to realize the composition and positioning function of SLAM algorithm. Using Gmapping, Hector, Karto, Cartographer four algorithms for indoor environment lobby, corridor, classroom, laboratory monocular radar SLAM scanning mapping, monitoring its voltage, current changes, composition speed three parameters. The results show that in the case of corridor, Gmapping algorithm is the optimal choice; in the case of hall composition, Gmapping algorithm is the optimal choice; in the case of classroom composition, Cartographer algorithm is the best choice; in conventional laboratory conditions, Gmapping algorithm is the best choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信