衡量加拿大卫生部门的成果:从医疗保健中获得更好的价值

J. Veillard, I. Dhalla, Omid Fekri, N. Klazinga
{"title":"衡量加拿大卫生部门的成果:从医疗保健中获得更好的价值","authors":"J. Veillard, I. Dhalla, Omid Fekri, N. Klazinga","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2689797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While Canada has a well-established tradition of transparency and accountability for health-system performance comparisons, few measures of outcomes are reported. In this Commentary, we examine what outcomes measurement is; the state of outcomes measurement in Canada; and offer recommendations so that the generation of better information on health system outcomes can help achieve greater value in the health sector. Outcome measures help to better understand how effectively the health system achieves its goals, support better decision-making by relating investment decisions to outcomes, and better match the delivery of health and social services to the evolving needs of populations and patients. From a research perspective, outcome measures help better understand how policy interventions and healthcare services can contribute to achieving targeted outcomes and their role in the broader social determinants of health. And from a democratic perspective, publicizing outcome measures can empower patients, families and communities to engage in the policy debate about which outcomes matter most and at what cost – and in the ways healthcare should be delivered. Among our key recommendations: • The federal and provincial governments should complement current data with outcome measures of relevance to patients, clinicians, system managers and policy practitioners. In particular, patient-reported outcome measures and patient reported experience measures should augment datasets currently available in panCanadian clinical registries. • Organizations with a mandate to report publicly on health-system performance, such as the Canadian Institute for Health information and provincial health quality councils, should collect outcomes data and report publicly on outcomes, filling current gaps in outcomes measurement and public reporting. The ultimate yardstick of success, however, will not be the quantity and accuracy of Canadian healthcare outcomes data, but rather how this information is put to use by clinicians, system managers and policymakers to advance health system goals. Better measurement can only take us so far. More critical is how the data will be aggregated, analyzed, risk-adjusted and, most importantly, how public policy and other interventions will incent professionals to improve outcomes and patients to demand better outcomes and value from the healthcare sector.","PeriodicalId":353219,"journal":{"name":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Outcomes in the Canadian Health Sector: Driving Better Value from Healthcare\",\"authors\":\"J. Veillard, I. Dhalla, Omid Fekri, N. Klazinga\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2689797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While Canada has a well-established tradition of transparency and accountability for health-system performance comparisons, few measures of outcomes are reported. In this Commentary, we examine what outcomes measurement is; the state of outcomes measurement in Canada; and offer recommendations so that the generation of better information on health system outcomes can help achieve greater value in the health sector. Outcome measures help to better understand how effectively the health system achieves its goals, support better decision-making by relating investment decisions to outcomes, and better match the delivery of health and social services to the evolving needs of populations and patients. From a research perspective, outcome measures help better understand how policy interventions and healthcare services can contribute to achieving targeted outcomes and their role in the broader social determinants of health. And from a democratic perspective, publicizing outcome measures can empower patients, families and communities to engage in the policy debate about which outcomes matter most and at what cost – and in the ways healthcare should be delivered. Among our key recommendations: • The federal and provincial governments should complement current data with outcome measures of relevance to patients, clinicians, system managers and policy practitioners. In particular, patient-reported outcome measures and patient reported experience measures should augment datasets currently available in panCanadian clinical registries. • Organizations with a mandate to report publicly on health-system performance, such as the Canadian Institute for Health information and provincial health quality councils, should collect outcomes data and report publicly on outcomes, filling current gaps in outcomes measurement and public reporting. The ultimate yardstick of success, however, will not be the quantity and accuracy of Canadian healthcare outcomes data, but rather how this information is put to use by clinicians, system managers and policymakers to advance health system goals. Better measurement can only take us so far. More critical is how the data will be aggregated, analyzed, risk-adjusted and, most importantly, how public policy and other interventions will incent professionals to improve outcomes and patients to demand better outcomes and value from the healthcare sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":353219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2689797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2689797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

虽然加拿大在卫生系统绩效比较方面具有透明度和问责制的良好传统,但报告的结果衡量指标很少。在这篇评论中,我们研究了什么是结果测量;加拿大成果衡量的现状;并提出建议,以便产生关于卫生系统成果的更好信息,从而有助于在卫生部门实现更大的价值。结果衡量有助于更好地了解卫生系统如何有效地实现其目标,通过将投资决策与结果联系起来支持更好的决策,并更好地使卫生和社会服务的提供与人群和患者不断变化的需求相匹配。从研究的角度来看,结果衡量有助于更好地了解政策干预和保健服务如何有助于实现目标结果及其在更广泛的健康社会决定因素中的作用。从民主的角度来看,公布结果措施可以让患者、家庭和社区参与到政策辩论中来,讨论哪些结果最重要,代价是什么——以及应该以何种方式提供医疗服务。在我们的主要建议中:•联邦和省政府应该用与患者、临床医生、系统管理人员和政策实践者相关的结果测量来补充当前的数据。特别是,患者报告的结果测量和患者报告的经验测量应该增加目前在全加拿大临床登记处可用的数据集。•授权公开报告卫生系统绩效的组织,如加拿大卫生信息研究所和省卫生质量委员会,应收集结果数据并公开报告结果,填补目前在结果测量和公开报告方面的空白。然而,衡量成功的最终标准不是加拿大医疗结果数据的数量和准确性,而是临床医生、系统管理人员和政策制定者如何利用这些信息来推进卫生系统目标。更好的测量只能带我们到此为止。更关键的是如何汇总、分析和调整数据,最重要的是,公共政策和其他干预措施将如何激励专业人员改善结果,以及患者如何要求医疗保健部门提供更好的结果和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Outcomes in the Canadian Health Sector: Driving Better Value from Healthcare
While Canada has a well-established tradition of transparency and accountability for health-system performance comparisons, few measures of outcomes are reported. In this Commentary, we examine what outcomes measurement is; the state of outcomes measurement in Canada; and offer recommendations so that the generation of better information on health system outcomes can help achieve greater value in the health sector. Outcome measures help to better understand how effectively the health system achieves its goals, support better decision-making by relating investment decisions to outcomes, and better match the delivery of health and social services to the evolving needs of populations and patients. From a research perspective, outcome measures help better understand how policy interventions and healthcare services can contribute to achieving targeted outcomes and their role in the broader social determinants of health. And from a democratic perspective, publicizing outcome measures can empower patients, families and communities to engage in the policy debate about which outcomes matter most and at what cost – and in the ways healthcare should be delivered. Among our key recommendations: • The federal and provincial governments should complement current data with outcome measures of relevance to patients, clinicians, system managers and policy practitioners. In particular, patient-reported outcome measures and patient reported experience measures should augment datasets currently available in panCanadian clinical registries. • Organizations with a mandate to report publicly on health-system performance, such as the Canadian Institute for Health information and provincial health quality councils, should collect outcomes data and report publicly on outcomes, filling current gaps in outcomes measurement and public reporting. The ultimate yardstick of success, however, will not be the quantity and accuracy of Canadian healthcare outcomes data, but rather how this information is put to use by clinicians, system managers and policymakers to advance health system goals. Better measurement can only take us so far. More critical is how the data will be aggregated, analyzed, risk-adjusted and, most importantly, how public policy and other interventions will incent professionals to improve outcomes and patients to demand better outcomes and value from the healthcare sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信