小额信贷对“贫困”客户可持续性的影响:概念回顾

Jeremiah Machingambi
{"title":"小额信贷对“贫困”客户可持续性的影响:概念回顾","authors":"Jeremiah Machingambi","doi":"10.14426/jei.v1i1.575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"paper proposes a conceptual framework based on development finance theory, for assessing the impact of microfinance on the sustainability of poor clients. The conceptual framework has been undertaken for a study on the impact of sustainable lending approaches on smallholder farming sustainability in rural Zimbabwe. Abstract: Debates on the impact of microfinance on alleviation of poverty have revolved around two contrasting approaches that advocate sustainable lending and subsidised lending, respectively. This conceptual paper presents literature reviews on sustainable lending and the subsidised lending approaches, and their impact on the sustainability of ‘poor’ clients. Literature reviews highlighted that the sustainable lending paradigm mainly focuses on serving the ‘active poor’ clients, whilst the subsidised lending approach focuses on serving ‘extremely poor’ clients, respectively. ‘Active poor’ clients are regarded as those who have marketable skills and/or control over earning assets and are considered creditworthy borrowers. In contrast, ‘extremely poor’ clients have neither marketable skills nor earning assets. Smallholder farmers were used as a proxy for extremely poor clients conceptualising the notion of sustainability. A conceptual framework was developed to identify the nature of the relationship amongst constructs, informing the relationship between microfinance and poor clients (smallholder farmers). The conceptual framework has been undertaken for a study on the impact of sustainable lending approaches on smallholder farming sustainability in rural Zimbabwe.","PeriodicalId":106682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entrepreneurial Innovations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE IMPACT OF MICROFINANCE ON THE SUSTAINABILITY OF ‘POOR’ CLIENTS: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Jeremiah Machingambi\",\"doi\":\"10.14426/jei.v1i1.575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"paper proposes a conceptual framework based on development finance theory, for assessing the impact of microfinance on the sustainability of poor clients. The conceptual framework has been undertaken for a study on the impact of sustainable lending approaches on smallholder farming sustainability in rural Zimbabwe. Abstract: Debates on the impact of microfinance on alleviation of poverty have revolved around two contrasting approaches that advocate sustainable lending and subsidised lending, respectively. This conceptual paper presents literature reviews on sustainable lending and the subsidised lending approaches, and their impact on the sustainability of ‘poor’ clients. Literature reviews highlighted that the sustainable lending paradigm mainly focuses on serving the ‘active poor’ clients, whilst the subsidised lending approach focuses on serving ‘extremely poor’ clients, respectively. ‘Active poor’ clients are regarded as those who have marketable skills and/or control over earning assets and are considered creditworthy borrowers. In contrast, ‘extremely poor’ clients have neither marketable skills nor earning assets. Smallholder farmers were used as a proxy for extremely poor clients conceptualising the notion of sustainability. A conceptual framework was developed to identify the nature of the relationship amongst constructs, informing the relationship between microfinance and poor clients (smallholder farmers). The conceptual framework has been undertaken for a study on the impact of sustainable lending approaches on smallholder farming sustainability in rural Zimbabwe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Entrepreneurial Innovations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Entrepreneurial Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14426/jei.v1i1.575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entrepreneurial Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14426/jei.v1i1.575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个基于发展金融理论的概念框架,用于评估小额信贷对贫困客户可持续性的影响。为研究可持续贷款办法对津巴布韦农村小农农业可持续性的影响,已经制定了概念框架。摘要:关于小额信贷对减贫影响的争论围绕着两种截然不同的方法展开,分别是倡导可持续贷款和补贴贷款。这篇概念性论文介绍了关于可持续贷款和补贴贷款方法的文献综述,以及它们对“贫困”客户的可持续性的影响。文献综述强调,可持续贷款模式主要侧重于服务“活跃贫困”客户,而补贴贷款方法分别侧重于服务“极端贫困”客户。“活跃贫困”客户被认为是那些拥有适销对路的技能和/或能控制盈利资产的人,他们被认为是信誉良好的借款人。相比之下,“极度贫困”的客户既没有适销对路的技能,也没有赚钱的资产。小农被用作极端贫困客户概念化可持续性概念的代理。开发了一个概念性框架,以确定结构之间关系的性质,为小额信贷与贫困客户(小农)之间的关系提供信息。为研究可持续贷款办法对津巴布韦农村小农农业可持续性的影响,已经制定了概念框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE IMPACT OF MICROFINANCE ON THE SUSTAINABILITY OF ‘POOR’ CLIENTS: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
paper proposes a conceptual framework based on development finance theory, for assessing the impact of microfinance on the sustainability of poor clients. The conceptual framework has been undertaken for a study on the impact of sustainable lending approaches on smallholder farming sustainability in rural Zimbabwe. Abstract: Debates on the impact of microfinance on alleviation of poverty have revolved around two contrasting approaches that advocate sustainable lending and subsidised lending, respectively. This conceptual paper presents literature reviews on sustainable lending and the subsidised lending approaches, and their impact on the sustainability of ‘poor’ clients. Literature reviews highlighted that the sustainable lending paradigm mainly focuses on serving the ‘active poor’ clients, whilst the subsidised lending approach focuses on serving ‘extremely poor’ clients, respectively. ‘Active poor’ clients are regarded as those who have marketable skills and/or control over earning assets and are considered creditworthy borrowers. In contrast, ‘extremely poor’ clients have neither marketable skills nor earning assets. Smallholder farmers were used as a proxy for extremely poor clients conceptualising the notion of sustainability. A conceptual framework was developed to identify the nature of the relationship amongst constructs, informing the relationship between microfinance and poor clients (smallholder farmers). The conceptual framework has been undertaken for a study on the impact of sustainable lending approaches on smallholder farming sustainability in rural Zimbabwe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信