{"title":"求解可满足性问题的两种进化方法的实证比较","authors":"Jin-Kao Hao, R. Dorne","doi":"10.1109/ICEC.1994.349908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper compares two evolutionary methods for model finding in the satisfiability problem (SAT): genetic algorithms (GAs) and the mask method (MASK). The main characteristics of these two methods are that both of them are population-based, and use binary representation. Great care is taken to make sure that the same SAT instances and the same criteria are used in the comparison. Results indicate that MASK greatly outperforms GAs in the sense that MASK manages to deal with harder SAT instances at a lower cost.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":393865,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence","volume":"178 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical comparison of two evolutionary methods for satisfiability problems\",\"authors\":\"Jin-Kao Hao, R. Dorne\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEC.1994.349908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper compares two evolutionary methods for model finding in the satisfiability problem (SAT): genetic algorithms (GAs) and the mask method (MASK). The main characteristics of these two methods are that both of them are population-based, and use binary representation. Great care is taken to make sure that the same SAT instances and the same criteria are used in the comparison. Results indicate that MASK greatly outperforms GAs in the sense that MASK manages to deal with harder SAT instances at a lower cost.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":393865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"178 9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEC.1994.349908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEC.1994.349908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An empirical comparison of two evolutionary methods for satisfiability problems
The paper compares two evolutionary methods for model finding in the satisfiability problem (SAT): genetic algorithms (GAs) and the mask method (MASK). The main characteristics of these two methods are that both of them are population-based, and use binary representation. Great care is taken to make sure that the same SAT instances and the same criteria are used in the comparison. Results indicate that MASK greatly outperforms GAs in the sense that MASK manages to deal with harder SAT instances at a lower cost.<>