{"title":"非结构化网格物理在高级体系结构上的性能评估","authors":"C. Ferenbaugh","doi":"10.1109/CLUSTER.2015.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unstructured mesh physics codes tend to exhibit different performance characteristics than other types of codes such as structured mesh or particle codes, due to their heavy use of indirection arrays and their irregular memory access patterns. For this reason unstructured mesh mini-apps are needed, alongside other types of mini-apps, to evaluate new architectures and hardware features. This paper uses one such mini-app, PENNANT, to investigate performance trends on architectures such as the Intel Xeon Phi, IBM BlueGene/Q, and NVIDIA K40 GPU. We present basic results comparing the performance of these platforms to each other and to traditional multicore CPUs. We also study the usefulness for unstructured codes of various hardware features such as hardware threading, advanced vector instructions, and fast atomic operations.","PeriodicalId":187042,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Unstructured Mesh Physics on Advanced Architectures\",\"authors\":\"C. Ferenbaugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLUSTER.2015.126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unstructured mesh physics codes tend to exhibit different performance characteristics than other types of codes such as structured mesh or particle codes, due to their heavy use of indirection arrays and their irregular memory access patterns. For this reason unstructured mesh mini-apps are needed, alongside other types of mini-apps, to evaluate new architectures and hardware features. This paper uses one such mini-app, PENNANT, to investigate performance trends on architectures such as the Intel Xeon Phi, IBM BlueGene/Q, and NVIDIA K40 GPU. We present basic results comparing the performance of these platforms to each other and to traditional multicore CPUs. We also study the usefulness for unstructured codes of various hardware features such as hardware threading, advanced vector instructions, and fast atomic operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTER.2015.126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTER.2015.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非结构化网格物理代码往往表现出不同于其他类型的代码(如结构化网格或粒子代码)的性能特征,因为它们大量使用间接数组和不规则的内存访问模式。出于这个原因,非结构化网格迷你应用程序需要与其他类型的迷你应用程序一起评估新的架构和硬件功能。本文使用一个这样的小应用程序PENNANT来调查架构上的性能趋势,如Intel Xeon Phi, IBM BlueGene/Q和NVIDIA K40 GPU。我们将这些平台的性能与传统的多核cpu进行了比较。我们还研究了各种硬件特性(如硬件线程、高级矢量指令和快速原子操作)对非结构化代码的有用性。
Performance Evaluation of Unstructured Mesh Physics on Advanced Architectures
Unstructured mesh physics codes tend to exhibit different performance characteristics than other types of codes such as structured mesh or particle codes, due to their heavy use of indirection arrays and their irregular memory access patterns. For this reason unstructured mesh mini-apps are needed, alongside other types of mini-apps, to evaluate new architectures and hardware features. This paper uses one such mini-app, PENNANT, to investigate performance trends on architectures such as the Intel Xeon Phi, IBM BlueGene/Q, and NVIDIA K40 GPU. We present basic results comparing the performance of these platforms to each other and to traditional multicore CPUs. We also study the usefulness for unstructured codes of various hardware features such as hardware threading, advanced vector instructions, and fast atomic operations.