[主眼和副眼在漏斗蜘蛛迷路Agelena迷路定向中的作用]。

Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie Pub Date : 1975-09-01
K Dornfeldt
{"title":"[主眼和副眼在漏斗蜘蛛迷路Agelena迷路定向中的作用]。","authors":"K Dornfeldt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The photomenotactic orientation of funnel spiders (Agelena labyrinthica [Cl.]) returning to their retreat was studied by measuring the direction of their course on the horizontal webs. 1. If a lamp was shifted 90 degrees just before the spider caught its prey the mean return course deviated less than 90 degrees from the direction of the retreat. This deviation was not only a function of the azimuth of the light and of the amount it had been moved, but also varied with the course taken when approaching the prey, the duration of the interval without light stimulation while the lamps were changed, the light stimulation experienced while at the retreat, the extent to which vision was experimentally reduced, and the light intensity. 2. Elimination of the principal or of the accessory eyes had little or no significant effect on the photomenotactic orientation. Spiders able to use only the median eye or one principal eye could no longer use the lamp to orient by. 3. Animals with full vision showed an increased (decreased) deviation from the direction of the retreat if the light intensity was abruptly increased (decreased), as did animals without principal eyes or without accessory eyes. The mean return directions were, however, not dependent upon light intensity changes before reaching the prey or after an interruption of web contact. The threshold for photomenotactic orientation using the accessory eyes is 0.366-10(-4) sb; the corresponding value for the principal eyes is 100 times larger. 4. If the lamp was not visible on the outward run the spiders were unable to perform correct return runs by light orientation without optical information from previous runs. If they could see a lamp while at the retreat their return course was shifted in the direction away from the light. Animals without principal eyes did not show this effect. 5. Spiders that had not performed an outward run did not keep to a straight course. Animals with full vision spontaneously showed negative phototactic orientation, those without principal eyes were usually positively phototactic. 6. Animals, whose web contact had been interrupted or animals without principal eyes showed a similar deviation from the correct return direction as did unmanipulated animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":76861,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie","volume":"38 2","pages":"113-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Role of the principal and accessory eyes in the photomenotactic orientation of the funnel spider Agelena labyrinthica (CL.)].\",\"authors\":\"K Dornfeldt\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The photomenotactic orientation of funnel spiders (Agelena labyrinthica [Cl.]) returning to their retreat was studied by measuring the direction of their course on the horizontal webs. 1. If a lamp was shifted 90 degrees just before the spider caught its prey the mean return course deviated less than 90 degrees from the direction of the retreat. This deviation was not only a function of the azimuth of the light and of the amount it had been moved, but also varied with the course taken when approaching the prey, the duration of the interval without light stimulation while the lamps were changed, the light stimulation experienced while at the retreat, the extent to which vision was experimentally reduced, and the light intensity. 2. Elimination of the principal or of the accessory eyes had little or no significant effect on the photomenotactic orientation. Spiders able to use only the median eye or one principal eye could no longer use the lamp to orient by. 3. Animals with full vision showed an increased (decreased) deviation from the direction of the retreat if the light intensity was abruptly increased (decreased), as did animals without principal eyes or without accessory eyes. The mean return directions were, however, not dependent upon light intensity changes before reaching the prey or after an interruption of web contact. The threshold for photomenotactic orientation using the accessory eyes is 0.366-10(-4) sb; the corresponding value for the principal eyes is 100 times larger. 4. If the lamp was not visible on the outward run the spiders were unable to perform correct return runs by light orientation without optical information from previous runs. If they could see a lamp while at the retreat their return course was shifted in the direction away from the light. Animals without principal eyes did not show this effect. 5. Spiders that had not performed an outward run did not keep to a straight course. Animals with full vision spontaneously showed negative phototactic orientation, those without principal eyes were usually positively phototactic. 6. Animals, whose web contact had been interrupted or animals without principal eyes showed a similar deviation from the correct return direction as did unmanipulated animals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"113-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过测量漏斗蛛(Agelena迷路蛛[Cl.])在水平蛛网上的行进方向,研究了漏斗蛛(Agelena迷路蛛)返回巢穴的光致定向。1. 如果一盏灯在蜘蛛捕捉猎物之前移动了90度,那么返回的平均路线与撤退的方向偏离不到90度。这种偏差不仅与光的方位和移动的量有关,而且还与接近猎物时的路线、更换灯时没有光刺激的间隔时间、撤退时所经历的光刺激、实验中视力下降的程度和光强有关。2. 消除主眼或副眼对光电定向的影响很小或没有显著影响。只能使用中间眼或一只主眼的蜘蛛不能再使用灯来定位。3.如果光强突然增加(减少),具有完全视力的动物与没有主眼或副眼的动物一样,偏离撤退方向的情况会增加(减少)。然而,在到达猎物之前或蛛网接触中断后,平均返回方向不依赖于光强的变化。辅助眼的光电定向阈值为0.366-10(-4)sb;主眼的对应值是主眼的100倍。4. 如果在向外跑的时候看不到灯,蜘蛛就不能在没有之前跑的光学信息的情况下根据光的方向进行正确的返回跑。如果他们在撤退时能看到一盏灯,他们返回的路线就会转向远离灯光的方向。没有主眼的动物则没有这种效果。5. 没有向外跑的蜘蛛不能保持直线运动。具有完全视觉的动物自发表现为负向趋光性取向,而没有主眼的动物通常表现为正向趋光性取向。6. 网络接触被中断的动物或没有主眼的动物与未被操纵的动物一样,对正确的返回方向表现出类似的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Role of the principal and accessory eyes in the photomenotactic orientation of the funnel spider Agelena labyrinthica (CL.)].

The photomenotactic orientation of funnel spiders (Agelena labyrinthica [Cl.]) returning to their retreat was studied by measuring the direction of their course on the horizontal webs. 1. If a lamp was shifted 90 degrees just before the spider caught its prey the mean return course deviated less than 90 degrees from the direction of the retreat. This deviation was not only a function of the azimuth of the light and of the amount it had been moved, but also varied with the course taken when approaching the prey, the duration of the interval without light stimulation while the lamps were changed, the light stimulation experienced while at the retreat, the extent to which vision was experimentally reduced, and the light intensity. 2. Elimination of the principal or of the accessory eyes had little or no significant effect on the photomenotactic orientation. Spiders able to use only the median eye or one principal eye could no longer use the lamp to orient by. 3. Animals with full vision showed an increased (decreased) deviation from the direction of the retreat if the light intensity was abruptly increased (decreased), as did animals without principal eyes or without accessory eyes. The mean return directions were, however, not dependent upon light intensity changes before reaching the prey or after an interruption of web contact. The threshold for photomenotactic orientation using the accessory eyes is 0.366-10(-4) sb; the corresponding value for the principal eyes is 100 times larger. 4. If the lamp was not visible on the outward run the spiders were unable to perform correct return runs by light orientation without optical information from previous runs. If they could see a lamp while at the retreat their return course was shifted in the direction away from the light. Animals without principal eyes did not show this effect. 5. Spiders that had not performed an outward run did not keep to a straight course. Animals with full vision spontaneously showed negative phototactic orientation, those without principal eyes were usually positively phototactic. 6. Animals, whose web contact had been interrupted or animals without principal eyes showed a similar deviation from the correct return direction as did unmanipulated animals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信