全球协作学习环境中任务内聚性的预测方法

Alberto Castro-Hernández, K. Swigger, Mirna Patricia Ponce Flores, David Terán Villanueva
{"title":"全球协作学习环境中任务内聚性的预测方法","authors":"Alberto Castro-Hernández, K. Swigger, Mirna Patricia Ponce Flores, David Terán Villanueva","doi":"10.1109/ICGSEW.2016.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a study that compared a number of interaction-based measures and their ability to predict cohesion within global software development projects. Messages were collected from three software development projects that involved students from two different countries. The similarities and quantities of such interactions were then analyzed and compared. Results from this analysis show a statistically significant correlation of linguistic characteristics (LSM) and Information Exchange Similarity with Task cohesion, when controlled by culture. In addition, the study found that quantity-based metrics had higher correlations with students' perceptions of their group's cohesiveness than similarity-based measures. More specifically, a word-based measure called Information Exchange Rate had a significant relationship to cohesion. Group rate measures were also tested, but only low significant correlations were found. These results suggest that measures based on quantity of interactions tend to be better predictors of cohesion within distributed learning teams.","PeriodicalId":207379,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshops (ICGSEW)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measures for Predicting Task Cohesion in a Global Collaborative Learning Environment\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Castro-Hernández, K. Swigger, Mirna Patricia Ponce Flores, David Terán Villanueva\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICGSEW.2016.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes a study that compared a number of interaction-based measures and their ability to predict cohesion within global software development projects. Messages were collected from three software development projects that involved students from two different countries. The similarities and quantities of such interactions were then analyzed and compared. Results from this analysis show a statistically significant correlation of linguistic characteristics (LSM) and Information Exchange Similarity with Task cohesion, when controlled by culture. In addition, the study found that quantity-based metrics had higher correlations with students' perceptions of their group's cohesiveness than similarity-based measures. More specifically, a word-based measure called Information Exchange Rate had a significant relationship to cohesion. Group rate measures were also tested, but only low significant correlations were found. These results suggest that measures based on quantity of interactions tend to be better predictors of cohesion within distributed learning teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshops (ICGSEW)\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshops (ICGSEW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSEW.2016.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Workshops (ICGSEW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSEW.2016.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文描述了一项研究,该研究比较了许多基于交互的度量和它们在全球软件开发项目中预测内聚性的能力。信息收集自三个软件开发项目,涉及来自两个不同国家的学生。然后分析和比较这些相互作用的相似性和数量。分析结果表明,在受文化控制的情况下,语言特征和信息交换相似度与任务衔接具有显著的统计学相关性。此外,研究发现,与基于相似性的衡量标准相比,基于数量的衡量标准与学生对团队凝聚力的看法有更高的相关性。更具体地说,一种叫做信息交换率的基于单词的测量方法与衔接有着重要的关系。小组比率测量也进行了测试,但只发现低显著相关性。这些结果表明,基于交互数量的度量倾向于更好地预测分布式学习团队中的凝聚力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measures for Predicting Task Cohesion in a Global Collaborative Learning Environment
This paper describes a study that compared a number of interaction-based measures and their ability to predict cohesion within global software development projects. Messages were collected from three software development projects that involved students from two different countries. The similarities and quantities of such interactions were then analyzed and compared. Results from this analysis show a statistically significant correlation of linguistic characteristics (LSM) and Information Exchange Similarity with Task cohesion, when controlled by culture. In addition, the study found that quantity-based metrics had higher correlations with students' perceptions of their group's cohesiveness than similarity-based measures. More specifically, a word-based measure called Information Exchange Rate had a significant relationship to cohesion. Group rate measures were also tested, but only low significant correlations were found. These results suggest that measures based on quantity of interactions tend to be better predictors of cohesion within distributed learning teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信