不同阻力运动和闭塞压力对运动后代谢应激和合成代谢激素反应的影响

C. Chou
{"title":"不同阻力运动和闭塞压力对运动后代谢应激和合成代谢激素反应的影响","authors":"C. Chou","doi":"10.5297/ser.1604.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different resistance loads (70% and 40% 1 RM [repetition maximum]) combined with different occlusion pressures (130% and 70% SBP [systolic blood pressure]) on metabolic stress and anabolic hormonal response after exercise. Fifteen healthy males voluntarily participated in this study. A counter-balance order experimental design was used in this investigation. On the experiment day, each subject performed a single bout of bilateral leg extension (5 sets, 12 repetitions with 1 min rest for each set) under the following five experimental conditions: (1) high intensity resistance exercise (HR, 70% 1 RM), (2) low intensity resistance exercise (LR, 40% 1 RM), (3) HR with low occlusion pressure (HRLO, 70% 1 RM + 70% SBP), (4) LR with high occlusion pressure (LRHO, 40% 1 RM+130% SBP), and (5) LR with low occlusion pressure (LRLO, 40% 1 RM+70% SBP). Blood biomarkers (i.e. hormones and lactate) were measured at prior to exercise (pre), and 0, 15, 30, 60 min after (post) exercise. The maximal isometric strength and electromyography of vastus lateralis were compared at pre and post-60. Results indicated that the GH of HRLO was higher at post-0, post-15 and post-30 than that at pre-exercise. The testosterone of HRLO was higher at post compared to LRHO, LRLO and LR. Furthermore, HRLO induced greater metabolic and physiological stress responses (LA and RPE) and a greater decline of muscular strength with more muscle fiber recruitment. We concluded that high intensity resistance exercise combined with low occlusion pressure would elevate metabolic stress and reduce maximal strength performance, thereby stimulating higher GH and testosterone responses. Our results thus suggest that this exercise model would have the positive benefits on muscle anabolic effect.","PeriodicalId":338279,"journal":{"name":"Sports & Exercise Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Different Resistance Exercise and Occlusion Pressures on Metabolic Stress and Anabolic Hormonal Responses after Exercise\",\"authors\":\"C. Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.5297/ser.1604.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different resistance loads (70% and 40% 1 RM [repetition maximum]) combined with different occlusion pressures (130% and 70% SBP [systolic blood pressure]) on metabolic stress and anabolic hormonal response after exercise. Fifteen healthy males voluntarily participated in this study. A counter-balance order experimental design was used in this investigation. On the experiment day, each subject performed a single bout of bilateral leg extension (5 sets, 12 repetitions with 1 min rest for each set) under the following five experimental conditions: (1) high intensity resistance exercise (HR, 70% 1 RM), (2) low intensity resistance exercise (LR, 40% 1 RM), (3) HR with low occlusion pressure (HRLO, 70% 1 RM + 70% SBP), (4) LR with high occlusion pressure (LRHO, 40% 1 RM+130% SBP), and (5) LR with low occlusion pressure (LRLO, 40% 1 RM+70% SBP). Blood biomarkers (i.e. hormones and lactate) were measured at prior to exercise (pre), and 0, 15, 30, 60 min after (post) exercise. The maximal isometric strength and electromyography of vastus lateralis were compared at pre and post-60. Results indicated that the GH of HRLO was higher at post-0, post-15 and post-30 than that at pre-exercise. The testosterone of HRLO was higher at post compared to LRHO, LRLO and LR. Furthermore, HRLO induced greater metabolic and physiological stress responses (LA and RPE) and a greater decline of muscular strength with more muscle fiber recruitment. We concluded that high intensity resistance exercise combined with low occlusion pressure would elevate metabolic stress and reduce maximal strength performance, thereby stimulating higher GH and testosterone responses. Our results thus suggest that this exercise model would have the positive benefits on muscle anabolic effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports & Exercise Research\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports & Exercise Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1604.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports & Exercise Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1604.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨不同阻力负荷(70%和40% 1 RM[重复最大值])结合不同闭塞压(130%和70%收缩压[收缩压])对运动后代谢应激和合成代谢激素反应的影响。15名健康男性自愿参加了这项研究。本研究采用平衡序实验设计。在实验一天,每个主题进行了单轮双边腿扩展(5集,12对每组重复剩下1分钟)在下列五个实验条件:(1)高强度抗阻训练(人力资源,70% 1 RM),(2)低强度抵抗运动(LR, 40% 1 RM),(3)人力资源与低阻塞压力(SBP HRLO, 70% 1 RM + 70%), (4) LR阻塞压力高(SBP LRHO, 40% 1 RM + 130%),和(5)较低的LR阻塞压力(SBP LRLO, 40% 1 RM + 70%)。在运动前(前)和运动后0、15、30、60分钟(后)测量血液生物标志物(即激素和乳酸)。比较60岁前后的股外侧肌最大等长肌力和肌电图。结果表明,HRLO的GH在0后、15后和30后均高于运动前。HRLO组的睾酮水平高于LRHO、LRLO和LR组。此外,HRLO诱导了更大的代谢和生理应激反应(LA和RPE),肌肉力量下降更大,肌肉纤维增加更多。我们得出结论,高强度阻力运动结合低闭塞压会提高代谢应激,降低最大力量表现,从而刺激更高的生长激素和睾酮反应。因此,我们的结果表明,这种运动模式将对肌肉合成代谢产生积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Different Resistance Exercise and Occlusion Pressures on Metabolic Stress and Anabolic Hormonal Responses after Exercise
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different resistance loads (70% and 40% 1 RM [repetition maximum]) combined with different occlusion pressures (130% and 70% SBP [systolic blood pressure]) on metabolic stress and anabolic hormonal response after exercise. Fifteen healthy males voluntarily participated in this study. A counter-balance order experimental design was used in this investigation. On the experiment day, each subject performed a single bout of bilateral leg extension (5 sets, 12 repetitions with 1 min rest for each set) under the following five experimental conditions: (1) high intensity resistance exercise (HR, 70% 1 RM), (2) low intensity resistance exercise (LR, 40% 1 RM), (3) HR with low occlusion pressure (HRLO, 70% 1 RM + 70% SBP), (4) LR with high occlusion pressure (LRHO, 40% 1 RM+130% SBP), and (5) LR with low occlusion pressure (LRLO, 40% 1 RM+70% SBP). Blood biomarkers (i.e. hormones and lactate) were measured at prior to exercise (pre), and 0, 15, 30, 60 min after (post) exercise. The maximal isometric strength and electromyography of vastus lateralis were compared at pre and post-60. Results indicated that the GH of HRLO was higher at post-0, post-15 and post-30 than that at pre-exercise. The testosterone of HRLO was higher at post compared to LRHO, LRLO and LR. Furthermore, HRLO induced greater metabolic and physiological stress responses (LA and RPE) and a greater decline of muscular strength with more muscle fiber recruitment. We concluded that high intensity resistance exercise combined with low occlusion pressure would elevate metabolic stress and reduce maximal strength performance, thereby stimulating higher GH and testosterone responses. Our results thus suggest that this exercise model would have the positive benefits on muscle anabolic effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信