对micah berdichevsky的《扫罗和保罗》的一些评论

D. Langton
{"title":"对micah berdichevsky的《扫罗和保罗》的一些评论","authors":"D. Langton","doi":"10.31826/mjj-2010-050104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Micah Berdichevsky (1865–1921), a giant of Hebrew literature, never completed his book-length study of the apostle , his literary executors ensured that Saul and Paul was published in 1971. Like the better known study by Joseph Klausner, Paul (1939), Berdichevsky’s work was a Zionist perspective on the founder of Gentile Christianity, written in Hebrew. Central to Saul and Paul is a mysterious document that Berdichevsky believed to be an ancient Jewish account of the conversion and missionary success of Paul, namely, the tale of the pagan priest, Abba Gulish. He went on to argue that Saul and Paul had been two different individuals, the one Jewish, the other pagan, and that Christian tradition had amalgamated them. Attributing historicity to a Hebrew legend rather than a Greek Christian one, Berdichevsky argued that Paulinism of Christianity in the Jewish Paul’s adoption of non-Jewish, Hellenistic ideas, Berdichevsky went one step further and denied Paul even a Jewish birth. In addition to a comparison of Klausner and Berdichevsky’s views of Paul, this short article includes the Hebrew text and translation of the story of","PeriodicalId":305040,"journal":{"name":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOME COMMENTS ON MICAH BERDICHEVSKY’S SAUL AND PAUL\",\"authors\":\"D. Langton\",\"doi\":\"10.31826/mjj-2010-050104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although Micah Berdichevsky (1865–1921), a giant of Hebrew literature, never completed his book-length study of the apostle , his literary executors ensured that Saul and Paul was published in 1971. Like the better known study by Joseph Klausner, Paul (1939), Berdichevsky’s work was a Zionist perspective on the founder of Gentile Christianity, written in Hebrew. Central to Saul and Paul is a mysterious document that Berdichevsky believed to be an ancient Jewish account of the conversion and missionary success of Paul, namely, the tale of the pagan priest, Abba Gulish. He went on to argue that Saul and Paul had been two different individuals, the one Jewish, the other pagan, and that Christian tradition had amalgamated them. Attributing historicity to a Hebrew legend rather than a Greek Christian one, Berdichevsky argued that Paulinism of Christianity in the Jewish Paul’s adoption of non-Jewish, Hellenistic ideas, Berdichevsky went one step further and denied Paul even a Jewish birth. In addition to a comparison of Klausner and Berdichevsky’s views of Paul, this short article includes the Hebrew text and translation of the story of\",\"PeriodicalId\":305040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2010-050104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2010-050104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管希伯来文学巨擘Micah Berdichevsky(1865-1921)从未完成对这位使徒的整本书的研究,但他的文学遗嘱执行人确保了《扫罗与保罗》在1971年出版。与约瑟夫·克劳斯纳(Joseph Klausner, Paul, 1939)更为人所知的研究一样,伯迪切夫斯基的作品是以希伯来语写成的,从犹太复国主义者的角度来看待外邦基督教的创始人。扫罗和保罗的核心是一份神秘的文件,伯季切夫斯基认为这是古代犹太人对保罗皈依和传教成功的描述,也就是异教徒牧师阿巴·古利什的故事。他接着说,扫罗和保罗是两个不同的个体,一个是犹太人,另一个是异教徒,基督教传统将他们融合在一起。伯季切夫斯基把历史归因于一个希伯来传说,而不是一个希腊基督教传说,他认为基督教的保罗主义是犹太人的保罗接受了非犹太人的希腊化思想,伯季切夫斯基更进一步,甚至否认保罗出生在犹太人。除了比较克劳斯纳和别尔季切夫斯基对保罗的看法外,这篇短文还包括希伯来文文本和保罗故事的翻译
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SOME COMMENTS ON MICAH BERDICHEVSKY’S SAUL AND PAUL
Although Micah Berdichevsky (1865–1921), a giant of Hebrew literature, never completed his book-length study of the apostle , his literary executors ensured that Saul and Paul was published in 1971. Like the better known study by Joseph Klausner, Paul (1939), Berdichevsky’s work was a Zionist perspective on the founder of Gentile Christianity, written in Hebrew. Central to Saul and Paul is a mysterious document that Berdichevsky believed to be an ancient Jewish account of the conversion and missionary success of Paul, namely, the tale of the pagan priest, Abba Gulish. He went on to argue that Saul and Paul had been two different individuals, the one Jewish, the other pagan, and that Christian tradition had amalgamated them. Attributing historicity to a Hebrew legend rather than a Greek Christian one, Berdichevsky argued that Paulinism of Christianity in the Jewish Paul’s adoption of non-Jewish, Hellenistic ideas, Berdichevsky went one step further and denied Paul even a Jewish birth. In addition to a comparison of Klausner and Berdichevsky’s views of Paul, this short article includes the Hebrew text and translation of the story of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信