{"title":"黑羊:马伦齐奥第七本书中的弗里吉亚模式和错位的牧歌(1595)","authors":"Seth J. Coluzzi","doi":"10.1525/JM.2013.30.2.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modal theory has been fraught with shortcomings and inconsistencies from the Renaissance to the present, but the Phrygian mode has proven especially problematic, earning a reputation as the unruly black sheep of the modal family. Much of the difficulty stems from the inadequacy of the clausula in mi to serve as an effective terminal cadence, the threat of mi contra fa between scale degrees 5 and 2 (B and F), and the tendency of Phrygian works to prefer the fourth and sixth degrees (A and C) as cadential goals. Although recent studies have attempted to provide nonmodal explanations for the melodic and cadential peculiarities of the Phrygian mode, these efforts have for the most part fallen short of serving as effective, normative theories, leaving instead a gap between music, mode, and model. The present study examines how the Phrygian mode functions both on the musical surface and on the larger scale in music of the late sixteenth century, showing how a new form of terminal cadence came into widespread practice after 1550 that proved utterly devoid of theoretical grounding. This overview leads to the exposition of a structural model for the Phrygian mode that is both normative within this repertory and accountable to contemporary modal theory. Although analyses of works by Rore, Palestrina, and Wert are used in support of this theoretical model, the main analytical focus is devoted to the madrigals “Tirsi morir volea” (1580) and “Cruda Amarilli, che col nome ancora” (1595) of Luca Marenzio. Based on these examples of Marenzio’s handling of the Phrygian mode, I question the modal designation of one work from Marenzio’s Seventh Book (1595), offering a new explanation for the book’s enigmatic departure from an ordering based on its principal textual source, Guarini’s Il pastor fido .","PeriodicalId":413730,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Musicology","volume":"55 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black Sheep: The Phrygian Mode and a Misplaced Madrigal in Marenzio’s Seventh Book (1595)\",\"authors\":\"Seth J. Coluzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/JM.2013.30.2.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modal theory has been fraught with shortcomings and inconsistencies from the Renaissance to the present, but the Phrygian mode has proven especially problematic, earning a reputation as the unruly black sheep of the modal family. Much of the difficulty stems from the inadequacy of the clausula in mi to serve as an effective terminal cadence, the threat of mi contra fa between scale degrees 5 and 2 (B and F), and the tendency of Phrygian works to prefer the fourth and sixth degrees (A and C) as cadential goals. Although recent studies have attempted to provide nonmodal explanations for the melodic and cadential peculiarities of the Phrygian mode, these efforts have for the most part fallen short of serving as effective, normative theories, leaving instead a gap between music, mode, and model. The present study examines how the Phrygian mode functions both on the musical surface and on the larger scale in music of the late sixteenth century, showing how a new form of terminal cadence came into widespread practice after 1550 that proved utterly devoid of theoretical grounding. This overview leads to the exposition of a structural model for the Phrygian mode that is both normative within this repertory and accountable to contemporary modal theory. Although analyses of works by Rore, Palestrina, and Wert are used in support of this theoretical model, the main analytical focus is devoted to the madrigals “Tirsi morir volea” (1580) and “Cruda Amarilli, che col nome ancora” (1595) of Luca Marenzio. Based on these examples of Marenzio’s handling of the Phrygian mode, I question the modal designation of one work from Marenzio’s Seventh Book (1595), offering a new explanation for the book’s enigmatic departure from an ordering based on its principal textual source, Guarini’s Il pastor fido .\",\"PeriodicalId\":413730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Musicology\",\"volume\":\"55 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Musicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2013.30.2.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2013.30.2.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
从文艺复兴时期到现在,模态理论一直充满着缺点和不一致之处,但弗里吉亚模态被证明是特别有问题的,赢得了模态家族中难以驾驭的害群之马的声誉。许多困难源于mi的子句不足以作为一个有效的结束节奏,mi contra fa在音阶5度和2度(B和F)之间的威胁,以及弗里吉亚作品倾向于将第四度和第六度(A和C)作为结束目标。尽管最近的研究试图为弗里吉亚调式的旋律和韵律特性提供非调式的解释,但这些努力在很大程度上都没有成为有效的、规范的理论,而是在音乐、调式和模式之间留下了空白。本研究考察了弗里吉亚调式是如何在16世纪晚期的音乐表面和更大的范围内发挥作用的,展示了一种新的终结节奏形式是如何在1550年后被证明完全缺乏理论基础的情况下广泛应用的。这一概述导致弗里吉亚模式的结构模型的阐述,既规范的剧目,并负责当代模态理论。虽然对罗、帕莱斯特里纳和沃特的作品进行了分析,以支持这一理论模型,但主要的分析重点是卢卡·马伦齐奥的牧歌《Tirsi morir volea》(1580)和《Cruda Amarilli, che colnome ancora》(1595)。基于这些马伦齐奥处理弗里吉亚调式的例子,我对马伦齐奥第七本书(1595)中一个作品的调式指定提出了质疑,为这本书神秘地偏离了基于其主要文本来源——瓜里尼的Il pastor fido的顺序提供了一种新的解释。
Black Sheep: The Phrygian Mode and a Misplaced Madrigal in Marenzio’s Seventh Book (1595)
Modal theory has been fraught with shortcomings and inconsistencies from the Renaissance to the present, but the Phrygian mode has proven especially problematic, earning a reputation as the unruly black sheep of the modal family. Much of the difficulty stems from the inadequacy of the clausula in mi to serve as an effective terminal cadence, the threat of mi contra fa between scale degrees 5 and 2 (B and F), and the tendency of Phrygian works to prefer the fourth and sixth degrees (A and C) as cadential goals. Although recent studies have attempted to provide nonmodal explanations for the melodic and cadential peculiarities of the Phrygian mode, these efforts have for the most part fallen short of serving as effective, normative theories, leaving instead a gap between music, mode, and model. The present study examines how the Phrygian mode functions both on the musical surface and on the larger scale in music of the late sixteenth century, showing how a new form of terminal cadence came into widespread practice after 1550 that proved utterly devoid of theoretical grounding. This overview leads to the exposition of a structural model for the Phrygian mode that is both normative within this repertory and accountable to contemporary modal theory. Although analyses of works by Rore, Palestrina, and Wert are used in support of this theoretical model, the main analytical focus is devoted to the madrigals “Tirsi morir volea” (1580) and “Cruda Amarilli, che col nome ancora” (1595) of Luca Marenzio. Based on these examples of Marenzio’s handling of the Phrygian mode, I question the modal designation of one work from Marenzio’s Seventh Book (1595), offering a new explanation for the book’s enigmatic departure from an ordering based on its principal textual source, Guarini’s Il pastor fido .