Cristina Maria Boldrini, Flávia Tomé, Juliana Moesch, Juliana Schmatz Mallmann, L. Oliveira, N. Roberti, A. Carvalho, G. Bertolini
{"title":"三种测量坐骨胫骨肌肉可伸性的仪器的可靠性评估:内、间评估器和间技术","authors":"Cristina Maria Boldrini, Flávia Tomé, Juliana Moesch, Juliana Schmatz Mallmann, L. Oliveira, N. Roberti, A. Carvalho, G. Bertolini","doi":"10.3900/FPJ.8.5.342.E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The measurement of range of motion (ROM) is important in therapeutic evaluations. It was evaluated the reliability intra and inter-valuators and inter-techniques, for three tools that measured the extensibility of the hamstring. Materials and Methods: The sample was composed of university students (n=20 /22.6±1.5 years). It was measured the extensibility of hamstring muscles of the right lower limb, and for this, ROM of the knee was examined by means of three tools: universal goniometer (UG), fixed goniometer (FG) and board goniometry (BO). There were six valuators in all, two by instrument (valuators A and B). The reliability was obtained by the index of correlation interclasses (ICC). Results: The intra-valuators reliability was heterogeneous, being: absent (FGA); moderate (UGB); high (UGA and BOB) and very high (FGB and BOA). The inter-valuators reliability was low for the FG and high for the other tools; while the inter-technique was high between UG and BO, but moderate when involving the FG. Discussion: It was observed that UG and BO are more reliable than FG and, in the clinical practice, allows an examiner to choose the tool that it is more accessible to him.","PeriodicalId":164994,"journal":{"name":"Fitness & Performance Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of rEliability intra and intEr- Evaluators and intErtEchniquEs for thrEE instrumEnts that mEasurE thE ExtEnsibility of thE ischiotibial musclEs\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Maria Boldrini, Flávia Tomé, Juliana Moesch, Juliana Schmatz Mallmann, L. Oliveira, N. Roberti, A. Carvalho, G. Bertolini\",\"doi\":\"10.3900/FPJ.8.5.342.E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The measurement of range of motion (ROM) is important in therapeutic evaluations. It was evaluated the reliability intra and inter-valuators and inter-techniques, for three tools that measured the extensibility of the hamstring. Materials and Methods: The sample was composed of university students (n=20 /22.6±1.5 years). It was measured the extensibility of hamstring muscles of the right lower limb, and for this, ROM of the knee was examined by means of three tools: universal goniometer (UG), fixed goniometer (FG) and board goniometry (BO). There were six valuators in all, two by instrument (valuators A and B). The reliability was obtained by the index of correlation interclasses (ICC). Results: The intra-valuators reliability was heterogeneous, being: absent (FGA); moderate (UGB); high (UGA and BOB) and very high (FGB and BOA). The inter-valuators reliability was low for the FG and high for the other tools; while the inter-technique was high between UG and BO, but moderate when involving the FG. Discussion: It was observed that UG and BO are more reliable than FG and, in the clinical practice, allows an examiner to choose the tool that it is more accessible to him.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fitness & Performance Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fitness & Performance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3900/FPJ.8.5.342.E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fitness & Performance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3900/FPJ.8.5.342.E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of rEliability intra and intEr- Evaluators and intErtEchniquEs for thrEE instrumEnts that mEasurE thE ExtEnsibility of thE ischiotibial musclEs
Introduction: The measurement of range of motion (ROM) is important in therapeutic evaluations. It was evaluated the reliability intra and inter-valuators and inter-techniques, for three tools that measured the extensibility of the hamstring. Materials and Methods: The sample was composed of university students (n=20 /22.6±1.5 years). It was measured the extensibility of hamstring muscles of the right lower limb, and for this, ROM of the knee was examined by means of three tools: universal goniometer (UG), fixed goniometer (FG) and board goniometry (BO). There were six valuators in all, two by instrument (valuators A and B). The reliability was obtained by the index of correlation interclasses (ICC). Results: The intra-valuators reliability was heterogeneous, being: absent (FGA); moderate (UGB); high (UGA and BOB) and very high (FGB and BOA). The inter-valuators reliability was low for the FG and high for the other tools; while the inter-technique was high between UG and BO, but moderate when involving the FG. Discussion: It was observed that UG and BO are more reliable than FG and, in the clinical practice, allows an examiner to choose the tool that it is more accessible to him.