Mads Nyborg Jespersen, J. Kirk, Asger Jul Rosendorf
{"title":"了解人类世","authors":"Mads Nyborg Jespersen, J. Kirk, Asger Jul Rosendorf","doi":"10.54337/academicquarter.vi25.7639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How to best approach the Anthropocene in terms of knowledge is an open question. In this paper we outline and discuss how the Anthropocene is imagined as an ongoing project attempting to develop systems of knowledge. Referring to Paul J. Crutzen, Reinhold Leinfelder, and Jan Zalaciewicz, we show how a tradition is forming around the notion of diverse Anthropocene knowledges as unified but split into two, more particularly, into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and social sciences and humanities (SSH). After a reading of two representative takes on the Anthropocene and knowledge by Carolyn Merchant and Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer respectively, we conclude that, despite attempts at interdisciplinarity and knowledge integration, the current ways of approaching the Anthropocene as a field of knowledge involve an uneasy mix of unification and stratification. We end by suggesting ways of overcoming this situation.","PeriodicalId":285489,"journal":{"name":"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing the Anthropocene\",\"authors\":\"Mads Nyborg Jespersen, J. Kirk, Asger Jul Rosendorf\",\"doi\":\"10.54337/academicquarter.vi25.7639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How to best approach the Anthropocene in terms of knowledge is an open question. In this paper we outline and discuss how the Anthropocene is imagined as an ongoing project attempting to develop systems of knowledge. Referring to Paul J. Crutzen, Reinhold Leinfelder, and Jan Zalaciewicz, we show how a tradition is forming around the notion of diverse Anthropocene knowledges as unified but split into two, more particularly, into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and social sciences and humanities (SSH). After a reading of two representative takes on the Anthropocene and knowledge by Carolyn Merchant and Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer respectively, we conclude that, despite attempts at interdisciplinarity and knowledge integration, the current ways of approaching the Anthropocene as a field of knowledge involve an uneasy mix of unification and stratification. We end by suggesting ways of overcoming this situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54337/academicquarter.vi25.7639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54337/academicquarter.vi25.7639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
如何在知识方面最好地接近人类世是一个悬而未决的问题。在本文中,我们概述并讨论了人类世如何被想象为一个正在进行的项目,试图发展知识系统。参考Paul J. Crutzen, Reinhold Leinfelder和Jan Zalaciewicz,我们展示了一种传统是如何形成的,围绕着人类世知识的多样性是统一的,但分为两个,更具体地说,分为科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)和社会科学和人文科学(SSH)。在分别阅读了Carolyn Merchant、Timothy Morton和Dominic Boyer关于人类世和知识的两篇代表性文章后,我们得出结论,尽管尝试了跨学科和知识整合,但目前将人类世作为一个知识领域来研究的方法涉及到统一和分层的令人不安的混合。最后,我们提出克服这种情况的方法。
How to best approach the Anthropocene in terms of knowledge is an open question. In this paper we outline and discuss how the Anthropocene is imagined as an ongoing project attempting to develop systems of knowledge. Referring to Paul J. Crutzen, Reinhold Leinfelder, and Jan Zalaciewicz, we show how a tradition is forming around the notion of diverse Anthropocene knowledges as unified but split into two, more particularly, into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and social sciences and humanities (SSH). After a reading of two representative takes on the Anthropocene and knowledge by Carolyn Merchant and Timothy Morton and Dominic Boyer respectively, we conclude that, despite attempts at interdisciplinarity and knowledge integration, the current ways of approaching the Anthropocene as a field of knowledge involve an uneasy mix of unification and stratification. We end by suggesting ways of overcoming this situation.