仲裁程序中的外国法律代理:新兴经济体法律服务业自由化的案例

Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye
{"title":"仲裁程序中的外国法律代理:新兴经济体法律服务业自由化的案例","authors":"Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2595844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note examines the issue of foreign legal representation in arbitral proceedings. This is done within the precincts of the broader issue of the benefits and likely detriments of a liberalized legal regime. The need for an evaluation of whether an emerging economy, which seeks to attract and retain foreign investments, should embrace international best practices in its legal system has never been more important. The right to legal representation of choice is well accepted and provided for by international arbitral instruments and even national legislations of leading arbitration jurisdictions. This note examines various international instruments, arbitral rules, national legislations; and also the policy considerations of various protectionist and liberal jurisdictions. It establishes that more jurisdictions have liberalized or are taking steps towards the liberalization of their legal services sector, particularly as it relates to arbitration. It concludes with a recommendation that emerging economies will achieve a cohesion in their economic and development policies, if they embrace a liberal approach, not just in the area of foreign legal representation but also in their legal services sector as a whole.","PeriodicalId":206472,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Political & Legal Issues (Topic)","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foreign Legal Representation in Arbitral Proceedings: The Case for a Liberalized Legal Services Sector in Emerging Economies\",\"authors\":\"Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2595844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note examines the issue of foreign legal representation in arbitral proceedings. This is done within the precincts of the broader issue of the benefits and likely detriments of a liberalized legal regime. The need for an evaluation of whether an emerging economy, which seeks to attract and retain foreign investments, should embrace international best practices in its legal system has never been more important. The right to legal representation of choice is well accepted and provided for by international arbitral instruments and even national legislations of leading arbitration jurisdictions. This note examines various international instruments, arbitral rules, national legislations; and also the policy considerations of various protectionist and liberal jurisdictions. It establishes that more jurisdictions have liberalized or are taking steps towards the liberalization of their legal services sector, particularly as it relates to arbitration. It concludes with a recommendation that emerging economies will achieve a cohesion in their economic and development policies, if they embrace a liberal approach, not just in the area of foreign legal representation but also in their legal services sector as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTL: Political & Legal Issues (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTL: Political & Legal Issues (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Political & Legal Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本说明探讨仲裁程序中的外国法律代理问题。这是在自由化法律制度的利益和可能的损害这一更广泛的问题范围内进行的。评估一个寻求吸引和留住外国投资的新兴经济体是否应该在其法律体系中采用国际最佳做法的必要性,从未像现在这样重要。选择法律代理的权利为国际仲裁文书甚至主要仲裁管辖区的国家立法所广泛接受和规定。本说明审查各种国际文书、仲裁规则、国家立法;还有各种保护主义和自由主义司法管辖区的政策考虑。它确定,更多的司法管辖区已经开放或正在采取步骤,以开放其法律服务部门,特别是与仲裁有关的法律服务部门。报告最后建议,如果新兴经济体不仅在外国法律代理领域,而且在其整个法律服务部门采取自由的做法,它们将在经济和发展政策中实现凝聚力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foreign Legal Representation in Arbitral Proceedings: The Case for a Liberalized Legal Services Sector in Emerging Economies
This note examines the issue of foreign legal representation in arbitral proceedings. This is done within the precincts of the broader issue of the benefits and likely detriments of a liberalized legal regime. The need for an evaluation of whether an emerging economy, which seeks to attract and retain foreign investments, should embrace international best practices in its legal system has never been more important. The right to legal representation of choice is well accepted and provided for by international arbitral instruments and even national legislations of leading arbitration jurisdictions. This note examines various international instruments, arbitral rules, national legislations; and also the policy considerations of various protectionist and liberal jurisdictions. It establishes that more jurisdictions have liberalized or are taking steps towards the liberalization of their legal services sector, particularly as it relates to arbitration. It concludes with a recommendation that emerging economies will achieve a cohesion in their economic and development policies, if they embrace a liberal approach, not just in the area of foreign legal representation but also in their legal services sector as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信