桌上可怜的亲戚:彼得·桑迪的批评风格以及犹太文学名词

Karl Vajda
{"title":"桌上可怜的亲戚:彼得·桑迪的批评风格以及犹太文学名词","authors":"Karl Vajda","doi":"10.13128/LEA-1824-484X-24427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to examine critically Peter Szondi’s literary hermeneutics from the perspective of his “huphainologic” concept, which stems from the Aristotle-inspired poetological character of this hermeneutics. In order to perform this task, I seek to answer the question whether Szondi’s text- and scriptocentrism is not a consequence of its neglect of the Jewish exegetical tradition. For the sake of giving an adequate analysis of problems raised by this question, I contrast the occidental, text-centered concept of Revelation with its oriental counterpart based on consonant script. As a next step, in this context, I give an outline of the reading- and interpretation-centred concept of Scripture characteristic of the period of Tannaim, touching upon the topic of middot (the methods or principles used by rabbinical hermeneutics), as well as exploring the dynamic nature and exegetical creativity of the reading- and interpretation-centred approach to Hebrew Revelation.","PeriodicalId":340115,"journal":{"name":"LEA : Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente","volume":"9 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der arme Verwandte am Tisch: Die kritische Hermeneutik von Peter Szondi und der jüdische Literaturbegriff\",\"authors\":\"Karl Vajda\",\"doi\":\"10.13128/LEA-1824-484X-24427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to examine critically Peter Szondi’s literary hermeneutics from the perspective of his “huphainologic” concept, which stems from the Aristotle-inspired poetological character of this hermeneutics. In order to perform this task, I seek to answer the question whether Szondi’s text- and scriptocentrism is not a consequence of its neglect of the Jewish exegetical tradition. For the sake of giving an adequate analysis of problems raised by this question, I contrast the occidental, text-centered concept of Revelation with its oriental counterpart based on consonant script. As a next step, in this context, I give an outline of the reading- and interpretation-centred concept of Scripture characteristic of the period of Tannaim, touching upon the topic of middot (the methods or principles used by rabbinical hermeneutics), as well as exploring the dynamic nature and exegetical creativity of the reading- and interpretation-centred approach to Hebrew Revelation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEA : Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente\",\"volume\":\"9 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEA : Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13128/LEA-1824-484X-24427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEA : Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/LEA-1824-484X-24427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是从他的“huphainological”概念的角度来批判性地审视彼得·松迪的文学解释学,这一概念源于这种解释学的亚里士多德启发诗学特征。为了完成这项任务,我试图回答这样一个问题,即Szondi的文本和剧本中心主义是否不是其忽视犹太训诂传统的结果。为了充分分析这个问题所带来的问题,我将西方以文本为中心的启示录概念与东方以辅音文字为基础的启示录概念进行了对比。下一步,在此背景下,我将概述坦纳姆时期以阅读和解释为中心的圣经概念,触及middot(拉比解释学使用的方法或原则)的主题,并探索以阅读和解释为中心的希伯来启示录方法的动态性质和训诂创造力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Der arme Verwandte am Tisch: Die kritische Hermeneutik von Peter Szondi und der jüdische Literaturbegriff
The aim of this paper is to examine critically Peter Szondi’s literary hermeneutics from the perspective of his “huphainologic” concept, which stems from the Aristotle-inspired poetological character of this hermeneutics. In order to perform this task, I seek to answer the question whether Szondi’s text- and scriptocentrism is not a consequence of its neglect of the Jewish exegetical tradition. For the sake of giving an adequate analysis of problems raised by this question, I contrast the occidental, text-centered concept of Revelation with its oriental counterpart based on consonant script. As a next step, in this context, I give an outline of the reading- and interpretation-centred concept of Scripture characteristic of the period of Tannaim, touching upon the topic of middot (the methods or principles used by rabbinical hermeneutics), as well as exploring the dynamic nature and exegetical creativity of the reading- and interpretation-centred approach to Hebrew Revelation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信