基于市场的再调度可能导致低效调度

Veronika Grimm, Alexander Martin, C. Sölch, Martin Weibelzahl, Gregor Zöttl
{"title":"基于市场的再调度可能导致低效调度","authors":"Veronika Grimm, Alexander Martin, C. Sölch, Martin Weibelzahl, Gregor Zöttl","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3120403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we analyze a uniform price electricity spot market that is followed by redispatch in the case of network congestion. We assume that the transmission system operator is incentivized to minimize redispatch cost and compare a cost-based redispatch to a market-based redispatch mechanism. For networks with at least three nodes we show that in contrast to cost-based redispatch, in the case of market-based redispatch the cost-minimizing allocation may not be short-run efficient. As we demonstrate, the possibility of the transmission system operator to reduce market-based redispatch cost at the expense of a reduced welfare may be driven by the electricity supply side or the electricity demand side. Based on these results, we propose a new hybrid approach where the transmission system operator implements the efficient (instead of the cost minimizing) dispatch and uses market-based redispatch compensations.","PeriodicalId":234456,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Energy eJournal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market-Based Redispatch May Result in Inefficient Dispatch\",\"authors\":\"Veronika Grimm, Alexander Martin, C. Sölch, Martin Weibelzahl, Gregor Zöttl\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3120403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we analyze a uniform price electricity spot market that is followed by redispatch in the case of network congestion. We assume that the transmission system operator is incentivized to minimize redispatch cost and compare a cost-based redispatch to a market-based redispatch mechanism. For networks with at least three nodes we show that in contrast to cost-based redispatch, in the case of market-based redispatch the cost-minimizing allocation may not be short-run efficient. As we demonstrate, the possibility of the transmission system operator to reduce market-based redispatch cost at the expense of a reduced welfare may be driven by the electricity supply side or the electricity demand side. Based on these results, we propose a new hybrid approach where the transmission system operator implements the efficient (instead of the cost minimizing) dispatch and uses market-based redispatch compensations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics & Energy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics & Energy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3120403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Energy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3120403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本文分析了电网拥塞情况下统一电价的电力现货市场再分配问题。我们假设输电系统运营商被激励最小化再调度成本,并将基于成本的再调度与基于市场的再调度机制进行比较。对于至少有三个节点的网络,我们表明,与基于成本的再分配相比,在基于市场的再分配情况下,成本最小化的分配可能不是短期有效的。正如我们所证明的那样,输电系统运营商以减少福利为代价降低市场再调度成本的可能性可能是由电力供应侧或电力需求侧驱动的。基于这些结果,我们提出了一种新的混合方法,其中输电系统运营商实现高效(而不是成本最小化)调度并使用基于市场的再调度补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Market-Based Redispatch May Result in Inefficient Dispatch
In this paper we analyze a uniform price electricity spot market that is followed by redispatch in the case of network congestion. We assume that the transmission system operator is incentivized to minimize redispatch cost and compare a cost-based redispatch to a market-based redispatch mechanism. For networks with at least three nodes we show that in contrast to cost-based redispatch, in the case of market-based redispatch the cost-minimizing allocation may not be short-run efficient. As we demonstrate, the possibility of the transmission system operator to reduce market-based redispatch cost at the expense of a reduced welfare may be driven by the electricity supply side or the electricity demand side. Based on these results, we propose a new hybrid approach where the transmission system operator implements the efficient (instead of the cost minimizing) dispatch and uses market-based redispatch compensations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信