政党立场会影响公众的政策偏好吗?

Elisabeth Grewenig, Philipp Lergetporer, Katharina Werner, Beata Smarzynska Javorcik
{"title":"政党立场会影响公众的政策偏好吗?","authors":"Elisabeth Grewenig, Philipp Lergetporer, Katharina Werner, Beata Smarzynska Javorcik","doi":"10.5282/UBM/EPUB.61370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard assumption of exogenous policy preferences implies that parties set their positions according to their voters\\' preferences. We investigate the reverse effect: Are the electorates\\' policy preferences responsive to party positions? In a representative German survey, we inform randomized treatment groups about the positions of political parties on two family policies, child care subsidy and universal student aid. In both experiments, results show that the treatment aligns the preferences of specific partisan groups with their preferred party\\'s position on the policy under consideration, implying endogeneity of policy preferences. The information treatment also affects non-partisan swing voters.","PeriodicalId":365899,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Party Positions Affect the Public's Policy Preferences?\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Grewenig, Philipp Lergetporer, Katharina Werner, Beata Smarzynska Javorcik\",\"doi\":\"10.5282/UBM/EPUB.61370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The standard assumption of exogenous policy preferences implies that parties set their positions according to their voters\\\\' preferences. We investigate the reverse effect: Are the electorates\\\\' policy preferences responsive to party positions? In a representative German survey, we inform randomized treatment groups about the positions of political parties on two family policies, child care subsidy and universal student aid. In both experiments, results show that the treatment aligns the preferences of specific partisan groups with their preferred party\\\\'s position on the policy under consideration, implying endogeneity of policy preferences. The information treatment also affects non-partisan swing voters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5282/UBM/EPUB.61370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5282/UBM/EPUB.61370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

外生政策偏好的标准假设意味着,政党根据选民的偏好来确定自己的立场。我们研究了相反的效应:选民的政策偏好是否对政党立场有反应?在一项有代表性的德国调查中,我们向随机分组的实验组告知政党在两项家庭政策上的立场,即儿童保育补贴和普遍的学生资助。在这两个实验中,结果都表明,这种待遇使特定党派群体的偏好与他们偏好的政党对政策的立场一致,这意味着政策偏好的内生性。信息处理也影响了无党派的摇摆选民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Party Positions Affect the Public's Policy Preferences?
The standard assumption of exogenous policy preferences implies that parties set their positions according to their voters\' preferences. We investigate the reverse effect: Are the electorates\' policy preferences responsive to party positions? In a representative German survey, we inform randomized treatment groups about the positions of political parties on two family policies, child care subsidy and universal student aid. In both experiments, results show that the treatment aligns the preferences of specific partisan groups with their preferred party\'s position on the policy under consideration, implying endogeneity of policy preferences. The information treatment also affects non-partisan swing voters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信