相关移植肝脏ct体积测量的优化方法

Yerkezhan Kalshabay, Z. Zholdybay, D. Baiguissova, G. Battalova
{"title":"相关移植肝脏ct体积测量的优化方法","authors":"Yerkezhan Kalshabay, Z. Zholdybay, D. Baiguissova, G. Battalova","doi":"10.35805/bsk2023iii002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computed tomography volumetry is the standard method for preoperative estimation of liver volume. Despite the development of various software, the trend towards discrepancy in the calculation of liver volume compared with any of the methods and intraoperative graft weight remains. The aim of the study was to optimize the manual method of CT volumetry donor’ liver, determine its accuracy and compare it with the standard method. Material and methods. A single-center prospective study including data from 60 liver donors who underwent computed tomography, CT volumetry and liver transplantation at the National Scientific Surgery Center named after A.N. Syzganov for the period 2018-2022. Results. The Pearson correlation between the right liver lobe volume estimated by the standard method and the graft weight was 0.730 (p<0.01), the Pearson correlation between the liver volume calculated by the optimized method (-10 HU) and the graft was 0.757 (p<0.01), and the correlation between the optimized method (-20 HU) and graft weight – 0.860 (p<0.01). The Pearson correlation coefficient of the optimized method (-20 HU) is statistically significantly higher than the correlation coefficient of the standard manual method (p=0.026), the difference between the correlation coefficient of the optimized method (-10 HU) and the standard one is statistically insignificant (p=0.375). The degree of discrepancy between the optimized method (-20 HU) was 8.4%, manual method - 12.7%. There is a statistically significant difference between the degree of discrepancy between the standard manual and optimized method (-20 HU) (p=0.029). Conclusions. Optimization of the manual CT volumetry method with a decrease in the liver density threshold by 20 HU demonstrated a statistically significantly high correlation coefficient with the graft weight, and also significantly reduced the degree of discrepancy.","PeriodicalId":197118,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING CT VOLUMETRY OF THE LIVER IN RELATED TRANSPLANTATION\",\"authors\":\"Yerkezhan Kalshabay, Z. Zholdybay, D. Baiguissova, G. Battalova\",\"doi\":\"10.35805/bsk2023iii002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computed tomography volumetry is the standard method for preoperative estimation of liver volume. Despite the development of various software, the trend towards discrepancy in the calculation of liver volume compared with any of the methods and intraoperative graft weight remains. The aim of the study was to optimize the manual method of CT volumetry donor’ liver, determine its accuracy and compare it with the standard method. Material and methods. A single-center prospective study including data from 60 liver donors who underwent computed tomography, CT volumetry and liver transplantation at the National Scientific Surgery Center named after A.N. Syzganov for the period 2018-2022. Results. The Pearson correlation between the right liver lobe volume estimated by the standard method and the graft weight was 0.730 (p<0.01), the Pearson correlation between the liver volume calculated by the optimized method (-10 HU) and the graft was 0.757 (p<0.01), and the correlation between the optimized method (-20 HU) and graft weight – 0.860 (p<0.01). The Pearson correlation coefficient of the optimized method (-20 HU) is statistically significantly higher than the correlation coefficient of the standard manual method (p=0.026), the difference between the correlation coefficient of the optimized method (-10 HU) and the standard one is statistically insignificant (p=0.375). The degree of discrepancy between the optimized method (-20 HU) was 8.4%, manual method - 12.7%. There is a statistically significant difference between the degree of discrepancy between the standard manual and optimized method (-20 HU) (p=0.029). Conclusions. Optimization of the manual CT volumetry method with a decrease in the liver density threshold by 20 HU demonstrated a statistically significantly high correlation coefficient with the graft weight, and also significantly reduced the degree of discrepancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35805/bsk2023iii002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35805/bsk2023iii002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算机断层扫描体积测量是术前估计肝脏体积的标准方法。尽管各种软件的发展,肝脏体积的计算与任何一种方法和术中移植物重量的差异趋势仍然存在。本研究的目的是优化人工CT供体肝脏体积测量方法,确定其准确性,并与标准方法进行比较。材料和方法。这是一项单中心前瞻性研究,包括2018-2022年期间在以A.N. Syzganov命名的国家科学外科中心接受计算机断层扫描、CT体积测量和肝移植的60名肝脏捐赠者的数据。结果。标准方法计算的右肝叶体积与移植物重量的Pearson相关性为0.730 (p<0.01),优化方法计算的肝体积(-10 HU)与移植物重量的Pearson相关性为0.757 (p<0.01),优化方法计算的肝体积(-20 HU)与移植物重量的Pearson相关性为- 0.860 (p<0.01)。优化方法的Pearson相关系数(-20 HU)显著高于标准手工方法的相关系数(p=0.026),与标准方法的相关系数(-10 HU)差异无统计学意义(p=0.375)。优化方法(-20 HU)与人工方法(- 12.7%)的差异程度为8.4%。标准手册与优化方法的差异程度有统计学意义(-20 HU) (p=0.029)。结论。手动CT容积法优化后,肝脏密度阈值降低20 HU,与移植物重量的相关系数具有统计学意义上的高,差异程度也显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING CT VOLUMETRY OF THE LIVER IN RELATED TRANSPLANTATION
Computed tomography volumetry is the standard method for preoperative estimation of liver volume. Despite the development of various software, the trend towards discrepancy in the calculation of liver volume compared with any of the methods and intraoperative graft weight remains. The aim of the study was to optimize the manual method of CT volumetry donor’ liver, determine its accuracy and compare it with the standard method. Material and methods. A single-center prospective study including data from 60 liver donors who underwent computed tomography, CT volumetry and liver transplantation at the National Scientific Surgery Center named after A.N. Syzganov for the period 2018-2022. Results. The Pearson correlation between the right liver lobe volume estimated by the standard method and the graft weight was 0.730 (p<0.01), the Pearson correlation between the liver volume calculated by the optimized method (-10 HU) and the graft was 0.757 (p<0.01), and the correlation between the optimized method (-20 HU) and graft weight – 0.860 (p<0.01). The Pearson correlation coefficient of the optimized method (-20 HU) is statistically significantly higher than the correlation coefficient of the standard manual method (p=0.026), the difference between the correlation coefficient of the optimized method (-10 HU) and the standard one is statistically insignificant (p=0.375). The degree of discrepancy between the optimized method (-20 HU) was 8.4%, manual method - 12.7%. There is a statistically significant difference between the degree of discrepancy between the standard manual and optimized method (-20 HU) (p=0.029). Conclusions. Optimization of the manual CT volumetry method with a decrease in the liver density threshold by 20 HU demonstrated a statistically significantly high correlation coefficient with the graft weight, and also significantly reduced the degree of discrepancy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信