防止虐待残疾人的建议:以《残疾人福利法》的修订与日本《防止虐待残疾人法》的比较法律考察为中心

Zaehee Kim
{"title":"防止虐待残疾人的建议:以《残疾人福利法》的修订与日本《防止虐待残疾人法》的比较法律考察为中心","authors":"Zaehee Kim","doi":"10.34267/cblj.2023.34.1.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Assembly is constantly discussing the enactment of the “Act on Special Cases on the Punishment of Abuse of Persons with Disabilities” for crimes of abuse of persons with disabilities. The enactment's arguments primarily call for zero tolerance and harsh penalties. However, it raises questions about the effectiveness of responding to the crime of abuse of the disabled only with aggravated punishment. In order to respond to abuse of the disabled, various cause analysis and approaches are needed. In particular, in the case of abuse by guardians of the disabled, if the guardian's economic and emotional burden leads to abuse, it will be more effective to prevent abuse of the disabled through education and support rather than severe punishment for the abuser. Then, in order to prevent abuse of the disabled, we looked at whether the current Welfare of the Disabled Act is meaningless in responding to abuse of the disabled. In addition, Japan's “Act on Prevention of Abuse of Persons with Disabilities” was comparatively reviewed. It was intended to effectively prevent abuse of the disabled and to propose practical countermeasures.","PeriodicalId":307875,"journal":{"name":"LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suggestions for Preventing Abuse of Persons with Disabilities: Focusing on the revision of 「Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilties」 and comparative legal review of Japanʼs 「Act on Prevention of Abuse of Persons with Disabilities」\",\"authors\":\"Zaehee Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.34267/cblj.2023.34.1.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The National Assembly is constantly discussing the enactment of the “Act on Special Cases on the Punishment of Abuse of Persons with Disabilities” for crimes of abuse of persons with disabilities. The enactment's arguments primarily call for zero tolerance and harsh penalties. However, it raises questions about the effectiveness of responding to the crime of abuse of the disabled only with aggravated punishment. In order to respond to abuse of the disabled, various cause analysis and approaches are needed. In particular, in the case of abuse by guardians of the disabled, if the guardian's economic and emotional burden leads to abuse, it will be more effective to prevent abuse of the disabled through education and support rather than severe punishment for the abuser. Then, in order to prevent abuse of the disabled, we looked at whether the current Welfare of the Disabled Act is meaningless in responding to abuse of the disabled. In addition, Japan's “Act on Prevention of Abuse of Persons with Disabilities” was comparatively reviewed. It was intended to effectively prevent abuse of the disabled and to propose practical countermeasures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34267/cblj.2023.34.1.63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34267/cblj.2023.34.1.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国会正在讨论制定针对虐待残疾人犯罪的“虐待残疾人处罚特别法”。该法案的论点主要是呼吁零容忍和严厉惩罚。但是,它提出了仅以加重惩罚来对付虐待残疾人罪行是否有效的问题。为了应对对残疾人的虐待,需要多种原因分析和方法。特别是在残疾人的监护人虐待的情况下,如果监护人的经济和情感负担导致虐待,通过教育和支持,而不是对虐待者进行严厉的惩罚,将更有效地防止虐待残疾人。然后,为了防止虐待残疾人,我们研究了现行的《残疾人福利法》在应对虐待残疾人方面是否毫无意义。此外,对日本《防止虐待残疾人法》进行了比较审查。其目的是有效防止对残疾人的虐待,并提出切实可行的对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suggestions for Preventing Abuse of Persons with Disabilities: Focusing on the revision of 「Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilties」 and comparative legal review of Japanʼs 「Act on Prevention of Abuse of Persons with Disabilities」
The National Assembly is constantly discussing the enactment of the “Act on Special Cases on the Punishment of Abuse of Persons with Disabilities” for crimes of abuse of persons with disabilities. The enactment's arguments primarily call for zero tolerance and harsh penalties. However, it raises questions about the effectiveness of responding to the crime of abuse of the disabled only with aggravated punishment. In order to respond to abuse of the disabled, various cause analysis and approaches are needed. In particular, in the case of abuse by guardians of the disabled, if the guardian's economic and emotional burden leads to abuse, it will be more effective to prevent abuse of the disabled through education and support rather than severe punishment for the abuser. Then, in order to prevent abuse of the disabled, we looked at whether the current Welfare of the Disabled Act is meaningless in responding to abuse of the disabled. In addition, Japan's “Act on Prevention of Abuse of Persons with Disabilities” was comparatively reviewed. It was intended to effectively prevent abuse of the disabled and to propose practical countermeasures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信