3“毒蛇会吃毒蛇”:陀思妥耶夫斯基、达尔文和兄弟情谊的可能性

Anna A. Berman
{"title":"3“毒蛇会吃毒蛇”:陀思妥耶夫斯基、达尔文和兄弟情谊的可能性","authors":"Anna A. Berman","doi":"10.1515/9781644690291-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Darwinian thought took root across Europe and Russia in the 1860s after the publication of On the Origin of Species (1859), intellectuals wrestled with the troubling implications the “struggle for existence” held for human harmony and love. How could people be expected to “love their neighbors” if that love ran counter to science? Was that love even commendable if it counteracted the perfection of the human race through the process of natural selection? And if Darwinian struggle was supposed to be most intense among those who were closest and had the most shared resources to compete for, what hope did this hold for the family? Darwin’s Russian contemporaries were particularly averse the idea that members of the same species were in competition. As Daniel Todes, James Rogers, and Alexander Vucinich have argued, Russian thinkers attempted to reject the Malthusian side of Darwin’s theory.1 Situated in the harsh, vast expanses of Russia, rather than on the crowded, verdant British Isles, they","PeriodicalId":115810,"journal":{"name":"Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"III. “Viper will eat viper”: Dostoevsky, Darwin, and the Possibility of Brotherhood\",\"authors\":\"Anna A. Berman\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9781644690291-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As Darwinian thought took root across Europe and Russia in the 1860s after the publication of On the Origin of Species (1859), intellectuals wrestled with the troubling implications the “struggle for existence” held for human harmony and love. How could people be expected to “love their neighbors” if that love ran counter to science? Was that love even commendable if it counteracted the perfection of the human race through the process of natural selection? And if Darwinian struggle was supposed to be most intense among those who were closest and had the most shared resources to compete for, what hope did this hold for the family? Darwin’s Russian contemporaries were particularly averse the idea that members of the same species were in competition. As Daniel Todes, James Rogers, and Alexander Vucinich have argued, Russian thinkers attempted to reject the Malthusian side of Darwin’s theory.1 Situated in the harsh, vast expanses of Russia, rather than on the crowded, verdant British Isles, they\",\"PeriodicalId\":115810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781644690291-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781644690291-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

19世纪60年代,在《物种起源》(1859)出版后,达尔文主义思想在欧洲和俄罗斯生根发芽,知识分子们纠结于人类和谐与爱所蕴含的“生存斗争”的令人不安的含义。如果这种爱与科学背道而驰,人们怎么能被期望去“爱他们的邻居”呢?如果这种爱通过自然选择的过程抵消了人类的完美,那它还值得称赞吗?如果达尔文的斗争应该在那些最亲密的人之间进行,并且有最多的共享资源来竞争,那么这对家庭有什么希望呢?与达尔文同时代的俄罗斯人尤其反对同一物种的成员之间存在竞争的观点。正如丹尼尔·托德斯、詹姆斯·罗杰斯和亚历山大·武西尼奇所说,俄国思想家试图拒绝达尔文理论中马尔萨斯的一面它们坐落在严酷而广阔的俄罗斯,而不是拥挤而苍翠的不列颠群岛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
III. “Viper will eat viper”: Dostoevsky, Darwin, and the Possibility of Brotherhood
As Darwinian thought took root across Europe and Russia in the 1860s after the publication of On the Origin of Species (1859), intellectuals wrestled with the troubling implications the “struggle for existence” held for human harmony and love. How could people be expected to “love their neighbors” if that love ran counter to science? Was that love even commendable if it counteracted the perfection of the human race through the process of natural selection? And if Darwinian struggle was supposed to be most intense among those who were closest and had the most shared resources to compete for, what hope did this hold for the family? Darwin’s Russian contemporaries were particularly averse the idea that members of the same species were in competition. As Daniel Todes, James Rogers, and Alexander Vucinich have argued, Russian thinkers attempted to reject the Malthusian side of Darwin’s theory.1 Situated in the harsh, vast expanses of Russia, rather than on the crowded, verdant British Isles, they
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信