主权豁免、非盟与国际刑事法院:合法性遭到破坏

Christa-Gaye Kerr
{"title":"主权豁免、非盟与国际刑事法院:合法性遭到破坏","authors":"Christa-Gaye Kerr","doi":"10.36642/mjil.41.1.sovereign","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note examines how the International Criminal Court’s indictment of African leaders has led to a breakdown in the relationship between the Court and the African Union and offers solutions to repair this relationship. In particular, the ICC’s blanket rejection of sovereign immunity and its close relationship with the UNSC delegitimize the Court. As an organization that relies on the cooperation of states across the world, this is something the Court cannot afford. The ICC’s decade-long fight with the African Union over the disproportionate number of charges leveled against African nationals has weakened its stature with African states. This has led the AU to call for a mass withdrawal of African nations from the ICC and to propose the implementation of its own regional court to handle international matters. As a solution to repair its relationship with the AU, this note proposes that the Court sever or lessen its relationship with the United Nations Security Council, which causes it to be more political than its original mandate intended; return to the broad principles of justice that convinced African nations to sign the Rome Statute; and work with the legal and cultural institutions of the region to help foster cooperation among interested parties.","PeriodicalId":331401,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Journal of International Law","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sovereign Immunity, the AU, and the ICC: Legitimacy Undermined\",\"authors\":\"Christa-Gaye Kerr\",\"doi\":\"10.36642/mjil.41.1.sovereign\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note examines how the International Criminal Court’s indictment of African leaders has led to a breakdown in the relationship between the Court and the African Union and offers solutions to repair this relationship. In particular, the ICC’s blanket rejection of sovereign immunity and its close relationship with the UNSC delegitimize the Court. As an organization that relies on the cooperation of states across the world, this is something the Court cannot afford. The ICC’s decade-long fight with the African Union over the disproportionate number of charges leveled against African nationals has weakened its stature with African states. This has led the AU to call for a mass withdrawal of African nations from the ICC and to propose the implementation of its own regional court to handle international matters. As a solution to repair its relationship with the AU, this note proposes that the Court sever or lessen its relationship with the United Nations Security Council, which causes it to be more political than its original mandate intended; return to the broad principles of justice that convinced African nations to sign the Rome Statute; and work with the legal and cultural institutions of the region to help foster cooperation among interested parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michigan Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michigan Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36642/mjil.41.1.sovereign\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36642/mjil.41.1.sovereign","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本说明探讨国际刑事法院对非洲领导人的起诉如何导致法院与非洲联盟之间的关系破裂,并提出修复这种关系的解决办法。特别是,国际刑事法院全面拒绝主权豁免及其与安理会的密切关系使该法院失去了合法性。作为一个依赖世界各国合作的组织,这是国际法院无法承受的。国际刑事法院与非洲联盟(African Union)长达十年的斗争,原因是针对非洲公民的指控数量不成比例,削弱了国际刑事法院在非洲国家中的地位。这导致非盟呼吁非洲国家大规模退出国际刑事法院,并提议建立自己的地区法院来处理国际事务。作为修复其与非盟关系的解决办法,本说明建议法院断绝或减少其与联合国安全理事会的关系,这使法院比其最初的任务规定更具政治性;回到促使非洲国家签署《罗马规约》的广泛的正义原则;与本地区的法律和文化机构合作,帮助促进有关各方之间的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sovereign Immunity, the AU, and the ICC: Legitimacy Undermined
This note examines how the International Criminal Court’s indictment of African leaders has led to a breakdown in the relationship between the Court and the African Union and offers solutions to repair this relationship. In particular, the ICC’s blanket rejection of sovereign immunity and its close relationship with the UNSC delegitimize the Court. As an organization that relies on the cooperation of states across the world, this is something the Court cannot afford. The ICC’s decade-long fight with the African Union over the disproportionate number of charges leveled against African nationals has weakened its stature with African states. This has led the AU to call for a mass withdrawal of African nations from the ICC and to propose the implementation of its own regional court to handle international matters. As a solution to repair its relationship with the AU, this note proposes that the Court sever or lessen its relationship with the United Nations Security Council, which causes it to be more political than its original mandate intended; return to the broad principles of justice that convinced African nations to sign the Rome Statute; and work with the legal and cultural institutions of the region to help foster cooperation among interested parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信