超越失败:第二张LAK失败马拉松海报

D. Clow, Rebecca Ferguson, Kirsty Kitto, Y. Cho, Mike Sharkey, C. Aguerrebere
{"title":"超越失败:第二张LAK失败马拉松海报","authors":"D. Clow, Rebecca Ferguson, Kirsty Kitto, Y. Cho, Mike Sharkey, C. Aguerrebere","doi":"10.1145/3027385.3029447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This poster will be a chance for a wider LAK audience to engage with the 2nd LAK Failathon workshop. Both of these will build on the successful Failathon event in 2016 and extend beyond discussing individual experiences of failure to exploring how the field can improve, particularly regarding the creation and use of evidence. Failure in research is an increasingly hot topic, with high-profile crises of confidence in the published research literature in medicine and psychology. Among the major factors in this research crisis are the many incentives to report and publish only positive findings. These incentives prevent the field in general from learning from negative findings, and almost entirely preclude the publication of mistakes and errors. Thus providing an alternative forum for practitioners and researchers to learn from each other's failures can be very productive. The first LAK Failathon, held in 2016, provided just such an opportunity for researchers and practitioners to share their failures and negative findings in a lower-stakes environment, to help participants learn from each other's mistakes. It was very successful, and there was strong support for running it as an annual event. The 2nd LAK Failathon workshop will build on that success, with twin objectives to provide an environment for individuals to learn from each other's failures, and also to co-develop plans for how we as a field can better build and deploy our evidence base. This poster is an opportunity for wider feedback on the plans developed in the workshop, with interactive use of sticky notes to add new ideas and coloured dots to illustrate prioritisation. This broadens the participant base in this important work, which should improve the quality of the plans and the commitment of the community to delivering them.","PeriodicalId":160897,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond failure: the 2nd LAK Failathon poster\",\"authors\":\"D. Clow, Rebecca Ferguson, Kirsty Kitto, Y. Cho, Mike Sharkey, C. Aguerrebere\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3027385.3029447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This poster will be a chance for a wider LAK audience to engage with the 2nd LAK Failathon workshop. Both of these will build on the successful Failathon event in 2016 and extend beyond discussing individual experiences of failure to exploring how the field can improve, particularly regarding the creation and use of evidence. Failure in research is an increasingly hot topic, with high-profile crises of confidence in the published research literature in medicine and psychology. Among the major factors in this research crisis are the many incentives to report and publish only positive findings. These incentives prevent the field in general from learning from negative findings, and almost entirely preclude the publication of mistakes and errors. Thus providing an alternative forum for practitioners and researchers to learn from each other's failures can be very productive. The first LAK Failathon, held in 2016, provided just such an opportunity for researchers and practitioners to share their failures and negative findings in a lower-stakes environment, to help participants learn from each other's mistakes. It was very successful, and there was strong support for running it as an annual event. The 2nd LAK Failathon workshop will build on that success, with twin objectives to provide an environment for individuals to learn from each other's failures, and also to co-develop plans for how we as a field can better build and deploy our evidence base. This poster is an opportunity for wider feedback on the plans developed in the workshop, with interactive use of sticky notes to add new ideas and coloured dots to illustrate prioritisation. This broadens the participant base in this important work, which should improve the quality of the plans and the commitment of the community to delivering them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":160897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这张海报将是一个机会,让更多的LAK观众参与第二届LAK Failathon研讨会。这两项活动都将以2016年成功的失败马拉松活动为基础,超越讨论个人失败经验,探索该领域如何改进,特别是在证据的创建和使用方面。研究失败是一个越来越热门的话题,在医学和心理学领域发表的研究文献中出现了备受瞩目的信心危机。在这场研究危机的主要因素中,有许多动机只报道和发表积极的发现。这些动机一般阻止了该领域从消极的发现中学习,并且几乎完全排除了错误和错误的发表。因此,为从业者和研究人员提供一个从彼此的失败中学习的替代论坛是非常有成效的。2016年举办的第一届LAK Failathon为研究人员和从业者提供了这样一个机会,让他们在一个低风险的环境中分享他们的失败和负面发现,帮助参与者从彼此的错误中吸取教训。它非常成功,并且得到了每年举办一次的强烈支持。第二届LAK Failathon研讨会将以这一成功为基础,有两个目标,一是为个人提供一个从彼此的失败中学习的环境,二是为我们作为一个领域如何更好地建立和部署我们的证据基础共同制定计划。这张海报是对研讨会中制定的计划进行更广泛反馈的机会,通过互动式便利贴添加新想法和彩色点来说明优先级。这扩大了这项重要工作的参与者基础,这将提高规划的质量,并提高社区对交付规划的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond failure: the 2nd LAK Failathon poster
This poster will be a chance for a wider LAK audience to engage with the 2nd LAK Failathon workshop. Both of these will build on the successful Failathon event in 2016 and extend beyond discussing individual experiences of failure to exploring how the field can improve, particularly regarding the creation and use of evidence. Failure in research is an increasingly hot topic, with high-profile crises of confidence in the published research literature in medicine and psychology. Among the major factors in this research crisis are the many incentives to report and publish only positive findings. These incentives prevent the field in general from learning from negative findings, and almost entirely preclude the publication of mistakes and errors. Thus providing an alternative forum for practitioners and researchers to learn from each other's failures can be very productive. The first LAK Failathon, held in 2016, provided just such an opportunity for researchers and practitioners to share their failures and negative findings in a lower-stakes environment, to help participants learn from each other's mistakes. It was very successful, and there was strong support for running it as an annual event. The 2nd LAK Failathon workshop will build on that success, with twin objectives to provide an environment for individuals to learn from each other's failures, and also to co-develop plans for how we as a field can better build and deploy our evidence base. This poster is an opportunity for wider feedback on the plans developed in the workshop, with interactive use of sticky notes to add new ideas and coloured dots to illustrate prioritisation. This broadens the participant base in this important work, which should improve the quality of the plans and the commitment of the community to delivering them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信