{"title":"雪崩范式:一种用于提高容错性的实验性软件编程技术","authors":"J. Voas, K. Miller","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.1996.494522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault propagation is both boon and curse. For programs undergoing V&V, propagation is a boon, since fault detection is the goal. After software deployment, particularly for safety critical applications, propagation can result in hazardous outputs, which are a curse. Methods to decrease fault propagation for deployed systems are warranted, and we have provided just such a technique in this paper. Fault-tolerant mechanisms are more or less effective depending on where they are placed in a program. This paper combines two different techniques in order to find places where fault-tolerant mechanisms are most likely to defend against hazards. The two techniques are: (1) dynamic fault-injection to estimate the likelihood that anomalies will lead to hazards, and (2) a static analysis that predicts (via a heuristic) the likelihood that program state anomalies (\"corruptions\") will propagate to subsequent program states during execution.","PeriodicalId":244671,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","volume":"444 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The avalanche paradigm: an experimental software programming technique for improving fault-tolerance\",\"authors\":\"J. Voas, K. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECBS.1996.494522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fault propagation is both boon and curse. For programs undergoing V&V, propagation is a boon, since fault detection is the goal. After software deployment, particularly for safety critical applications, propagation can result in hazardous outputs, which are a curse. Methods to decrease fault propagation for deployed systems are warranted, and we have provided just such a technique in this paper. Fault-tolerant mechanisms are more or less effective depending on where they are placed in a program. This paper combines two different techniques in order to find places where fault-tolerant mechanisms are most likely to defend against hazards. The two techniques are: (1) dynamic fault-injection to estimate the likelihood that anomalies will lead to hazards, and (2) a static analysis that predicts (via a heuristic) the likelihood that program state anomalies (\\\"corruptions\\\") will propagate to subsequent program states during execution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"volume\":\"444 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.1996.494522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.1996.494522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The avalanche paradigm: an experimental software programming technique for improving fault-tolerance
Fault propagation is both boon and curse. For programs undergoing V&V, propagation is a boon, since fault detection is the goal. After software deployment, particularly for safety critical applications, propagation can result in hazardous outputs, which are a curse. Methods to decrease fault propagation for deployed systems are warranted, and we have provided just such a technique in this paper. Fault-tolerant mechanisms are more or less effective depending on where they are placed in a program. This paper combines two different techniques in order to find places where fault-tolerant mechanisms are most likely to defend against hazards. The two techniques are: (1) dynamic fault-injection to estimate the likelihood that anomalies will lead to hazards, and (2) a static analysis that predicts (via a heuristic) the likelihood that program state anomalies ("corruptions") will propagate to subsequent program states during execution.