雪崩范式:一种用于提高容错性的实验性软件编程技术

J. Voas, K. Miller
{"title":"雪崩范式:一种用于提高容错性的实验性软件编程技术","authors":"J. Voas, K. Miller","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.1996.494522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault propagation is both boon and curse. For programs undergoing V&V, propagation is a boon, since fault detection is the goal. After software deployment, particularly for safety critical applications, propagation can result in hazardous outputs, which are a curse. Methods to decrease fault propagation for deployed systems are warranted, and we have provided just such a technique in this paper. Fault-tolerant mechanisms are more or less effective depending on where they are placed in a program. This paper combines two different techniques in order to find places where fault-tolerant mechanisms are most likely to defend against hazards. The two techniques are: (1) dynamic fault-injection to estimate the likelihood that anomalies will lead to hazards, and (2) a static analysis that predicts (via a heuristic) the likelihood that program state anomalies (\"corruptions\") will propagate to subsequent program states during execution.","PeriodicalId":244671,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","volume":"444 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The avalanche paradigm: an experimental software programming technique for improving fault-tolerance\",\"authors\":\"J. Voas, K. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECBS.1996.494522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fault propagation is both boon and curse. For programs undergoing V&V, propagation is a boon, since fault detection is the goal. After software deployment, particularly for safety critical applications, propagation can result in hazardous outputs, which are a curse. Methods to decrease fault propagation for deployed systems are warranted, and we have provided just such a technique in this paper. Fault-tolerant mechanisms are more or less effective depending on where they are placed in a program. This paper combines two different techniques in order to find places where fault-tolerant mechanisms are most likely to defend against hazards. The two techniques are: (1) dynamic fault-injection to estimate the likelihood that anomalies will lead to hazards, and (2) a static analysis that predicts (via a heuristic) the likelihood that program state anomalies (\\\"corruptions\\\") will propagate to subsequent program states during execution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"volume\":\"444 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.1996.494522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.1996.494522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

故障传播既是好事也是坏事。对于进行V&V的程序,传播是一个福音,因为故障检测是目标。在软件部署之后,特别是对于安全关键应用程序,传播可能导致危险的输出,这是一个诅咒。减少已部署系统故障传播的方法是必要的,我们在本文中提供了这样一种技术。容错机制的有效性取决于它们在程序中的位置。本文结合了两种不同的技术,以便找到容错机制最有可能防范危险的地方。这两种技术是:(1)动态故障注入,以估计异常将导致危险的可能性;(2)静态分析,预测(通过启发式)程序状态异常(“损坏”)在执行期间传播到后续程序状态的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The avalanche paradigm: an experimental software programming technique for improving fault-tolerance
Fault propagation is both boon and curse. For programs undergoing V&V, propagation is a boon, since fault detection is the goal. After software deployment, particularly for safety critical applications, propagation can result in hazardous outputs, which are a curse. Methods to decrease fault propagation for deployed systems are warranted, and we have provided just such a technique in this paper. Fault-tolerant mechanisms are more or less effective depending on where they are placed in a program. This paper combines two different techniques in order to find places where fault-tolerant mechanisms are most likely to defend against hazards. The two techniques are: (1) dynamic fault-injection to estimate the likelihood that anomalies will lead to hazards, and (2) a static analysis that predicts (via a heuristic) the likelihood that program state anomalies ("corruptions") will propagate to subsequent program states during execution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信