规划一个按需社区的临时城市

M. Ferreri
{"title":"规划一个按需社区的临时城市","authors":"M. Ferreri","doi":"10.5117/9789462984912_CH05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter explores how temporary urban ideas and values have become\n embedded in urban planning policy. It examines the institutionalisation\n of pop-up and temporary places in post-2008 London policymaking. It particularly\n draws on policy analysis, participant observations and interviews\n with public agencies, professionals and community organisations involved\n in the redevelopment of the London 2012 Olympics neighbourhoods.\n The case of a youth-oriented temporary community space is taken as\n emblematic of a shift towards increasingly short-term public provision at\n the margins of longer-term privatisation. It concludes that the imaginary of\n pop-up participation follows an ‘on-demand’ logic that sits uncomfortably\n with the needs and demands of urban communities affected by austerity\n policies and that risks ushering in further exclusion and precarisation.","PeriodicalId":371064,"journal":{"name":"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning a temporary city of ondemand communities\",\"authors\":\"M. Ferreri\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789462984912_CH05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chapter explores how temporary urban ideas and values have become\\n embedded in urban planning policy. It examines the institutionalisation\\n of pop-up and temporary places in post-2008 London policymaking. It particularly\\n draws on policy analysis, participant observations and interviews\\n with public agencies, professionals and community organisations involved\\n in the redevelopment of the London 2012 Olympics neighbourhoods.\\n The case of a youth-oriented temporary community space is taken as\\n emblematic of a shift towards increasingly short-term public provision at\\n the margins of longer-term privatisation. It concludes that the imaginary of\\n pop-up participation follows an ‘on-demand’ logic that sits uncomfortably\\n with the needs and demands of urban communities affected by austerity\\n policies and that risks ushering in further exclusion and precarisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984912_CH05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984912_CH05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨了临时城市理念和价值观是如何融入城市规划政策的。它考察了2008年后伦敦政策制定中弹出式和临时场所的制度化。它特别借鉴了政策分析、参与者观察以及对参与2012年伦敦奥运会社区重建的公共机构、专业人士和社区组织的采访。以青年为导向的临时社区空间的案例被视为在长期私有化的边缘向日益短期的公共提供转变的象征。它的结论是,快闪式参与的想象遵循了一种“按需”的逻辑,这与受紧缩政策影响的城市社区的需求和要求不相容,并有可能导致进一步的排斥和不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planning a temporary city of ondemand communities
The chapter explores how temporary urban ideas and values have become embedded in urban planning policy. It examines the institutionalisation of pop-up and temporary places in post-2008 London policymaking. It particularly draws on policy analysis, participant observations and interviews with public agencies, professionals and community organisations involved in the redevelopment of the London 2012 Olympics neighbourhoods. The case of a youth-oriented temporary community space is taken as emblematic of a shift towards increasingly short-term public provision at the margins of longer-term privatisation. It concludes that the imaginary of pop-up participation follows an ‘on-demand’ logic that sits uncomfortably with the needs and demands of urban communities affected by austerity policies and that risks ushering in further exclusion and precarisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信