Tong Yang, Bo Yuan, Shenjiang Zhang, Ting Zhang, Ruian Duan, Yi Wang, B. Liu
{"title":"大规模路由表的快速更新逼近最优压缩","authors":"Tong Yang, Bo Yuan, Shenjiang Zhang, Ting Zhang, Ruian Duan, Yi Wang, B. Liu","doi":"10.1109/IWQoS.2012.6245978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the fast development of Internet, the size of routing tables in the backbone routers keeps a rapid growth in recent years. An effective solution to control the memory occupation of the ever-increased huge routing table is the Forwarding Information Base (FIB) compression. Existing optimal FIB compression algorithm ORTC suffers from high computational complexity and poor update performance, due to the loss of essential structure information during its compression process. To address this problem, we present two suboptimal FIB compression algorithms - EAR-fast and EAR-slow, respectively, based on our proposed Election and Representative (EAR) algorithm which is an optimal FIB compression algorithm. The two suboptimal algorithms preserve the structure information, and support fast incremental updates while reducing computational complexity. Experiments on an 18-month real data set show that compared with ORTC, the proposed EAR-fast algorithm requires only 9.8% compression time and 37.7% memory space, but supports faster update while prolonging the recompression interval remarkably. All these performance advantages come at a cost of merely a 1.5% loss in compression ratio compared with the theoretical optimal ratio.","PeriodicalId":178333,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaching optimal compression with fast update for large scale routing tables\",\"authors\":\"Tong Yang, Bo Yuan, Shenjiang Zhang, Ting Zhang, Ruian Duan, Yi Wang, B. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWQoS.2012.6245978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the fast development of Internet, the size of routing tables in the backbone routers keeps a rapid growth in recent years. An effective solution to control the memory occupation of the ever-increased huge routing table is the Forwarding Information Base (FIB) compression. Existing optimal FIB compression algorithm ORTC suffers from high computational complexity and poor update performance, due to the loss of essential structure information during its compression process. To address this problem, we present two suboptimal FIB compression algorithms - EAR-fast and EAR-slow, respectively, based on our proposed Election and Representative (EAR) algorithm which is an optimal FIB compression algorithm. The two suboptimal algorithms preserve the structure information, and support fast incremental updates while reducing computational complexity. Experiments on an 18-month real data set show that compared with ORTC, the proposed EAR-fast algorithm requires only 9.8% compression time and 37.7% memory space, but supports faster update while prolonging the recompression interval remarkably. All these performance advantages come at a cost of merely a 1.5% loss in compression ratio compared with the theoretical optimal ratio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWQoS.2012.6245978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWQoS.2012.6245978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
近年来,随着互联网的快速发展,骨干路由器的路由表规模保持了快速增长。对于日益增长的庞大路由表,控制其内存占用的有效解决方案是转发信息库(Forwarding Information Base, FIB)压缩。现有最优FIB压缩算法ORTC由于在压缩过程中丢失了基本的结构信息,计算量大,更新性能差。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了两个次优的FIB压缩算法- EAR-fast和EAR-slow,分别基于我们提出的选举和代表(EAR)算法是最优的FIB压缩算法。这两种次优算法保留了结构信息,支持快速增量更新,同时降低了计算复杂度。在18个月的真实数据集上进行的实验表明,与ORTC相比,本文提出的ear快速算法只需要9.8%的压缩时间和37.7%的内存空间,但支持更快的更新,并且显著延长了重压缩间隔。所有这些性能优势的代价是压缩比与理论最佳比相比仅损失1.5%。
Approaching optimal compression with fast update for large scale routing tables
With the fast development of Internet, the size of routing tables in the backbone routers keeps a rapid growth in recent years. An effective solution to control the memory occupation of the ever-increased huge routing table is the Forwarding Information Base (FIB) compression. Existing optimal FIB compression algorithm ORTC suffers from high computational complexity and poor update performance, due to the loss of essential structure information during its compression process. To address this problem, we present two suboptimal FIB compression algorithms - EAR-fast and EAR-slow, respectively, based on our proposed Election and Representative (EAR) algorithm which is an optimal FIB compression algorithm. The two suboptimal algorithms preserve the structure information, and support fast incremental updates while reducing computational complexity. Experiments on an 18-month real data set show that compared with ORTC, the proposed EAR-fast algorithm requires only 9.8% compression time and 37.7% memory space, but supports faster update while prolonging the recompression interval remarkably. All these performance advantages come at a cost of merely a 1.5% loss in compression ratio compared with the theoretical optimal ratio.