手写与基于mof的元数据存储库:SOFA体验

Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004. Pub Date : 2004-05-24 DOI:10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316716

P. Hnetynka, Michal Píse

{"title":"手写与基于mof的元数据存储库:SOFA体验","authors":"P. Hnetynka, Michal Píse","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metadata management is one of the key concepts of distributed interoperable systems. This paper compares two approaches to building a metadata repository for component-based distributed environment. We compare a hand-written repository and MOF-based one with respect to easiness of building and accessing them. The results are based on implementations of the both repositories for a real component model.","PeriodicalId":137219,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand-written vs. MOF-based metadata repositories: the SOFA experience\",\"authors\":\"P. Hnetynka, Michal Píse\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Metadata management is one of the key concepts of distributed interoperable systems. This paper compares two approaches to building a metadata repository for component-based distributed environment. We compare a hand-written repository and MOF-based one with respect to easiness of building and accessing them. The results are based on implementations of the both repositories for a real component model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

摘要

元数据管理是分布式互操作系统的关键概念之一。本文比较了为基于组件的分布式环境构建元数据存储库的两种方法。我们比较了手写的存储库和基于mof的存储库的构建和访问的容易程度。结果基于两个存储库对真实组件模型的实现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hand-written vs. MOF-based metadata repositories: the SOFA experience

Metadata management is one of the key concepts of distributed interoperable systems. This paper compares two approaches to building a metadata repository for component-based distributed environment. We compare a hand-written repository and MOF-based one with respect to easiness of building and accessing them. The results are based on implementations of the both repositories for a real component model.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.

自引率

0.00%

发文量