改进单参数威布尔:贝叶斯方法

A. Aron, Huairui Guo, A. Mettas, D. Ogden
{"title":"改进单参数威布尔:贝叶斯方法","authors":"A. Aron, Huairui Guo, A. Mettas, D. Ogden","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to estimate the parameters in a Weibull distribution will lead to a biased estimation of the shape parameter when the sample size is small or too few failures are observed. This bias may lead to inaccurate reliability point estimates. In addition, with few data points available in the calculation, the uncertainty of the estimated parameters is high, which again leads to high uncertainty in the predicted reliability (i.e. wide confidence bounds). To overcome these two issues, the 1-parameter Weibull distribution has been widely used, provided that the shape parameter is known beforehand. This approach, however, does not account for any uncertainty in the assumed value of the shape parameter and can therefore yield optimistic results in the form of tight confidence bounds. It can be improved with better information about the variability of the shaper parameter. In this paper, a Bayesian model, which is an improved approach for the 1-parameter Weibull, is discussed. Recommendations for establishing variability models for the Weibull shape parameter are presented.","PeriodicalId":201787,"journal":{"name":"2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the 1-parameter Weibull: A Bayesian approach\",\"authors\":\"A. Aron, Huairui Guo, A. Mettas, D. Ogden\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to estimate the parameters in a Weibull distribution will lead to a biased estimation of the shape parameter when the sample size is small or too few failures are observed. This bias may lead to inaccurate reliability point estimates. In addition, with few data points available in the calculation, the uncertainty of the estimated parameters is high, which again leads to high uncertainty in the predicted reliability (i.e. wide confidence bounds). To overcome these two issues, the 1-parameter Weibull distribution has been widely used, provided that the shape parameter is known beforehand. This approach, however, does not account for any uncertainty in the assumed value of the shape parameter and can therefore yield optimistic results in the form of tight confidence bounds. It can be improved with better information about the variability of the shaper parameter. In this paper, a Bayesian model, which is an improved approach for the 1-parameter Weibull, is discussed. Recommendations for establishing variability models for the Weibull shape parameter are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

使用极大似然估计(MLE)来估计威布尔分布中的参数,在样本量较小或观察到的故障太少时,会导致形状参数的估计有偏。这种偏差可能导致不准确的可靠性点估计。此外,由于计算中可用的数据点很少,估计参数的不确定性很高,这再次导致预测可靠性的不确定性很高(即置信限很宽)。为了克服这两个问题,在形状参数事先已知的情况下,广泛使用了单参数威布尔分布。然而,这种方法不考虑形状参数假设值中的任何不确定性,因此可以以严格置信范围的形式产生乐观的结果。通过更好地了解成形器参数的可变性,可以对其进行改进。本文讨论了一种改进的单参数威布尔模型——贝叶斯模型。提出了建立威布尔形状参数变率模型的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the 1-parameter Weibull: A Bayesian approach
Using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to estimate the parameters in a Weibull distribution will lead to a biased estimation of the shape parameter when the sample size is small or too few failures are observed. This bias may lead to inaccurate reliability point estimates. In addition, with few data points available in the calculation, the uncertainty of the estimated parameters is high, which again leads to high uncertainty in the predicted reliability (i.e. wide confidence bounds). To overcome these two issues, the 1-parameter Weibull distribution has been widely used, provided that the shape parameter is known beforehand. This approach, however, does not account for any uncertainty in the assumed value of the shape parameter and can therefore yield optimistic results in the form of tight confidence bounds. It can be improved with better information about the variability of the shaper parameter. In this paper, a Bayesian model, which is an improved approach for the 1-parameter Weibull, is discussed. Recommendations for establishing variability models for the Weibull shape parameter are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信