评估回归测试选择技术的框架

G. Rothermel, M. J. Harrold
{"title":"评估回归测试选择技术的框架","authors":"G. Rothermel, M. J. Harrold","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.1994.296779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regression testing is a necessary but expensive activity aimed at showing that code has not been adversely affected by changes. A selective approach to regression testing attempts to reuse tests from an existing test suite to test a modified program. This paper outlines issues relevant to selective retest approaches, and presents a framework within which such approaches can be evaluated. This framework is then used to evaluate and compare existing selective retest algorithms. The evaluation reveals strengths and weaknesses of existing methods, and highlights problems that future work in this area should address.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":432962,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"100","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for evaluating regression test selection techniques\",\"authors\":\"G. Rothermel, M. J. Harrold\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSE.1994.296779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regression testing is a necessary but expensive activity aimed at showing that code has not been adversely affected by changes. A selective approach to regression testing attempts to reuse tests from an existing test suite to test a modified program. This paper outlines issues relevant to selective retest approaches, and presents a framework within which such approaches can be evaluated. This framework is then used to evaluate and compare existing selective retest algorithms. The evaluation reveals strengths and weaknesses of existing methods, and highlights problems that future work in this area should address.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":432962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"100\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.1994.296779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.1994.296779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 100

摘要

回归测试是一项必要但昂贵的活动,旨在显示代码没有受到更改的不利影响。回归测试的选择性方法试图重用现有测试套件中的测试来测试修改后的程序。本文概述了与选择性复测方法相关的问题,并提出了一个框架,在这个框架内可以评估这些方法。然后使用该框架来评估和比较现有的选择性重测算法。该评估揭示了现有方法的优缺点,并突出了该领域未来工作应解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A framework for evaluating regression test selection techniques
Regression testing is a necessary but expensive activity aimed at showing that code has not been adversely affected by changes. A selective approach to regression testing attempts to reuse tests from an existing test suite to test a modified program. This paper outlines issues relevant to selective retest approaches, and presents a framework within which such approaches can be evaluated. This framework is then used to evaluate and compare existing selective retest algorithms. The evaluation reveals strengths and weaknesses of existing methods, and highlights problems that future work in this area should address.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信